Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
WHE to Collingwood
Essendon going to be a problem with Marchbank
Aphrodite you're going to love this one. FB poster reckons Carlton have offered Jesse Hogan 6.5 million for 5 years.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
WHE to Collingwood
Essendon going to be a problem with Marchbank
Or paid relocation to Tasmania to become the Southern Blues.You should keep this post copied in a text file for whenever it needs to be explained to the muppets on the main board.
If anything, I think you're understating it. If we didn't land Judd the best we could hope for right now is AFL administration ala Melbourne. Worst case... Fitzroy.
Has a ring to it...can't deny that...Or paid relocation to Tasmania to become the Southern Blues.
Yeah but that's the thing isn't it - haven't heard any particular driving reason for Marchbank to come to us, just back to Vic. So if another club offers him a better deal and can satisfy GWS with trade, there's nothing really tying him to us. He'd likely get a regular spot with us, Essendon, Richmond, Melbourne etc when fit.Marchbank just has to nominate Carlton and we are home.
North is who I'm concerned about if they lose Wells they'll have a lot of money to throw at good youngsters.
They'll be offering pick 19 but Marchbank would nominate us for a guaranteed game wouldn't he?WHE to Collingwood
Essendon going to be a problem with Marchbank
They'll be offering pick 19 but Marchbank would nominate us for a guaranteed game wouldn't he?
The most noticeable link in common with those teams is the rock solid professional admin they had at the time of their success and a couple with some AFL concessions, but still well run clubs.
We had no idea what it took to win games pre-Judd, let alone have success. I recall interviews with players who were dispirited and felt we were close to having a mass exodus. Kennedy was not developing well.
We had a dearth of leaders. I think it is very optimistic to think success would have taken just an extra year. Judd brought more than just playing talent. He brought professional standards, he brought hope, he allowed Murphy and Gibbs more time, he shouldered the media focus and he worked with the coaches to communicate the messages.
We can look at the fact we didn't have ultimate success with Judd but some foundations were set. The players stood up against those who were not toeing the line and started to get hungry. So many intangibles with Judd.
I remember a great story in the pre-season that Judd joined. After a training session the players had a function at Raheen (Dick Pratts mansion). Naturally the food was laid on - cakes, danishes, ice-cream etc.
I think it was Marc Murphy who said he went up to the table and was filling his plate with junk when he looked over and saw Chris Judd ignoring the sweets and filling his plate with fruit.
Murphy said he sheepishly shoveled the cakes back off his plate and filled it with fruit. if it was good enough for Juddy it was good enough for him !
It was this complete 24/7 professionalism and attention to detail that Judd brought to Carlton.
It'd make it easier to stomach but no, no I wouldn't. I'm consistent with this across all sports. I'm a basketball guy but my interest in the NBA is fast dwindling with these "super teams".and you'd happily sit on the side of "all is level playing field", should success for us component was current.
I can't disagree with any of that, especially the Bulldogs part. Yet the fact remains that it's still the same teams of the last decade up top.
And how does that work when all the good players nominate the top clubs & academies are in place? Like it or not, GWS & free agency is a problem.Equalisation isn't about kneecapping good clubs, it's about giving opportunity to the crap clubs to become good.
And how does that work when all the good players nominate the top clubs & academies are in place? Like it or not, GWS & free agency is a problem.
It'd make it easier to stomach but no, no I wouldn't. I'm consistent with this across all sports. I'm a basketball guy but my interest in the NBA is fast dwindling with these "super teams".
Sport is meant to be a competition, not contrived nonsense like GWS. It makes a mockery of the clubs like the Dogs who've done it the right way.
Nice idea, like itFree agency is definitely a problem. Compensation should be scrapped, and the 4 preliminary finalists should be banned from gaining FA players.
Kevin Durant went to the Warriors because the organisation is A grade and are successful. They BUILT their team through the draft, and managed it as such that they could afford to 1) attract KD and fit him under the cap and 2) offer opportunity for success.
I heard it was in the canteen and it was hot chips.
