Can I withdraw my nomination for Cattery for poster of the year?![]()
No you may not.

The bolded is junk. Varcoe was very good against the Bulldogs and good against Collingwood.
Now cool ya jets catempire, it's not junk simply because you disagree with it, it's merely my opinion, which can be right or wrong same as yours, although I do realise it's bordering on sacrilege to say anything negative about Trav.
Let's take a look at his "good" game against Collingwood. One possie in the first quarter, which he stuffed up, five in a five minute period in the second and one other beside those, then didn't lay his hands on the leather again until about eight minutes left in the third, at which time we were leading by forty points, game done and dusted, Pies dragging their arses, and surprise surprise, Trav steps up and starts contributing.
Where was he when the heat was on and the game was up for grabs, nowhere to be seen unfortunately, so if you want to say he played a good game because he racked up a few possies and a couple of goals in what was basically junk time then that's your opinion, I'll disagree with it, but won't call it junk; for mine he was arguably our least effective player "when it mattered."
He won't be dropped. Nor will anyone. The only way Stokes will play is if there is an injury we don't know about.
Never said he would, just that "if" Stokes returned Varcoe should be the one to make way, not Wojcinski or Byrnes, again just my opinion.
I would call it 3 out of 5 good, including two very good.
Once more I beg to differ, I'll stick to two average/poor and two [ Saints and Hawks last year ] exceedingly poor.









