Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Brayden Maynard

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This just in.... AFL will now include players from the AFLW from 2024 season onwards due to a new ruling banning any contact or action that may impact an opposition player or resemble the old Aussie Rules Football game. The AFL also will ensure that fans will no longer be permitted to boo opposition players as it causes them to feel bad.

2024 Snowflake Cup. Every participant will get a medal.
Don't bring sexism here. The women play even harder than the men.
 
Biomechanist: I do not believe Maynard's body position at the time of impact can be considered part of any conscious decision.

game-set ..

That's huge.
 
It's a shame that we need to call in a biomechanics prof to repeat what common sense already tells us, but here we are.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Chair Gleeson says the evidence of a biomechanist says that ther was no time for Maynard to react, and asks if the tribunal accepts this, would that be the end of the matter?

Woods replies that it would, only if they were to not accept the argument that the decision to jump with momentum was "inherently dangerous".
 
Suggesting players should be protected is a troll now?

Why do you have such a hard on to see players concussed?

You're a dribbler. A poster of no consequence. Only slightly amusing because you think that people don't see the troll.

On your way.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Chair Gleeson says the evidence of a biomechanist says that ther was no time for Maynard to react, and asks if the tribunal accepts this, would that be the end of the matter?

Woods replies that it would, only if they were to not accept the argument that the decision to jump with momentum was "inherently dangerous".
What a ****ing dh
 
Chair Gleeson says the evidence of a biomechanist says that ther was no time for Maynard to react, and asks if the tribunal accepts this, would that be the end of the matter?

Woods replies that it would, only if they were to not accept the argument that the decision to jump with momentum was "inherently dangerous".
Is that it then? I'm happy with that. 🍾
 
Suggesting players should be protected is a troll now?

Why do you have such a hard on to see players concussed?
No one wants to see anyone concussed but unfortunately it's a part of every contact sport and accidents happen
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You're a dribbler. A poster of no consequence. Only slightly amusing because you think that people don't see the troll.

On your way.
I was being genuine but it like to see your melts when you encounter some real bait.
 
How do you brace like Woods is saying? I can't conjure up a mental picture of it.

"Had his hands come down and braced … it would have logically cushioned the blow."
 
Woods (AFL): If he doesn't turn, there probably would've been a reportable offence, but it would reduce the carelessness.

That is a bizarre take. As far at tribunal offences are concerned, it's either careless or it isn't reportable. Short of intentional

Woods arguments are so bizarre I’m starting to think the AFL want Bruzzy to get off. They’re going through the motions just so they can say they did.
 
It's a shame that we need to call in a biomechanics prof to repeat what common sense already tells us, but here we are.
Should he finish with suggesting that in terms of physical movements, the AFL counsel's dad should have withdrawn?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom