Remove this Banner Ad

Official Club Stuff BREAKING: Luke Sayers steps down effective immediately (Jan 22nd)!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

My first thought is why would we be interested in swapping out one bloke with a sketchy white collar history for another, but then remembered this is Carlton.
Are you solely basing that on his employment history at JP Morgan or do you have specifics?
 
Too early to say whether it's the right choice or not.

Has some strong creds, let's see what he can do...
 
Are you solely basing that on his employment history at JP Morgan or do you have specifics?
There are specifics in the public domain relating to his time at JP Morgan and the fallout from that with ASX. His involvement in a cartel case, where he sought immunity under the first-in principle, then walked back legally-binding statements he made, etc. It was pretty darn grubby but for Carlton it's more of the same really...

I would preferred a clean-slate and break from our "traditions" but that's just me.
 
There are specifics in the public domain relating to his time at JP Morgan and the fallout from that with ASX. His involvement in a cartel case, where he sought immunity under the first-in principle, then walked back legally-binding statements he made, etc. It was pretty darn grubby but for Carlton it's more of the same really...

I would preferred a clean-slate and break from our "traditions" but that's just me.

IMG_1057.jpeg

It was a simpler time …
 

Remove this Banner Ad

There are specifics in the public domain relating to his time at JP Morgan and the fallout from that with ASX. His involvement in a cartel case, where he sought immunity under the first-in principle, then walked back legally-binding statements he made, etc. It was pretty darn grubby but for Carlton it's more of the same really...

I would preferred a clean-slate and break from our "traditions" but that's just me.
Thanks. Time to do some reading
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

IMO, the biggest and most important question that needs to be answered by the board is, why members no longer vote for board members/presidents. A very undemocratic process.
 
IMO, the biggest and most important question that needs to be answered by the board is, why members no longer vote for board members/presidents. A very undemocratic process.
Why is a democracy necessarily a good thing when it comes to who leads the club? Have you met the average supporter?

What is stopping people nominating and the members voting for board members though?
 
It's so that they get people with the necessary expertise on the board.
A professional process, rather than an undemocratic one.

I agree with this as a concept, but there's no reason to lock rank and file members out of the process entirely. You effectively have a board going unchecked at the moment.

The "professional" component of this statement is pretty critical to integrity of the process.This is true when you consider the previous president is an accused corporate criminal who has been replaced by another who turned on his co-conspirators in exchange for immunity in another white-collar crime.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top