Brett Burton > Damon White

[Toots Hibbert]

What did D White actually do ??...

If it's the same incident the troll is referring to, White was infringed slightly while going for a mark near the boundary line. He turned around to see whether the umpire was going to award a free kick which he did. It was a tiggy touchwood free. White went back and took the shot from a tight angle a fair way out and nailed the goal.

Nice work Damon.

 

[Total Power]

One banning is not good enough eh Arabian Goggles?? your obsession continues

 

[Spadge]

im still trying to work out how appealing for a free kick compares to squealing to the tribunal

 

[Angry Dragon]

One banning is not good enough eh Arabian Goggles?? your obsession continues

The prosecution rests. Squeal squeal squeal.

How will someone be banned for pointing something out that actually happened?

 

[Angry Dragon]

We are not concerned with a make believe "private life", after all, how "private" can things get for a eunuch?

Again, here they are playing the man and not the ball. Address the issue, not the messenger.

 

[Total Power]

The prosecution rests. Squeal squeal squeal.

How will someone be banned for pointing something out that actually happened?

Obviously Bigfooty thought that you are a ********er thats why they banned you.Too bad that you are back, with a different clubname, but still the same attitude.

 

[Handyandy]

im still trying to work out how appealing for a free kick compares to squealing to the tribunal

It is seriously stupid to compare a person appealing for a free (for having his foot stomped behind play) to someone who goes up to the tribunal and gives false evidence to secure a report against a fellow afl player (it wasnt actually monty who struck him).

Try again angry dragon because this thread is lame.

 

[Angry Dragon]

Obviously Bigfooty thought that you are a ********er thats why they banned you.Too bad that you are back, with a different clubname, but still the same attitude.

I'll ask politely again: address the issue. All I've done is point out an inconsistency.

If you thought my thread is offensive or abusive, hit the report button.

 

[Asgardian]

Again, here they are playing the man and not the ball. Address the issue, not the messenger.

I've seen no issue raised by yourself worthy of any form of serious reply

 

[sworc36]

It is seriously stupid to compare a person appealing for a free (for having his foot stomped behind play) to someone who goes up to the tribunal and gives false evidence to secure a report against a fellow afl player (it wasnt actually monty who struck him).

Try again angry dragon because this thread is lame.

Didnt Lade give evidence against a "fellow afl player"?

 

[Crow-mo]

both your team lost on the weekend, the swans and the crows, must be a bit bitter yes?

why can you not discuss the topic at hand.

 

[Crow-mo]

It's obviously not implied as I don't agree with you. Once again, stop suggesting to everyone else what you think my thoughts are.
The actions of a few supporters are not representative of the entire supporter base. And does this seriously warrant a thread, created by an apparent "neutral" supporter?

why post in a thread, where you afraid of discussing the issue?

why not just avoid it, if you're unable to address the actual point.

 

[Slammer]

Angry Dragon, to deliberately stamp on a players foot after he has kicked a goal is a low mongrel act, particularly if you know the player - Damon White - had a very severe foot/ankle unjury that kept him out of footy for two years.

And if you want to try to compare this with the "Burton Case" you are way off beam.

And if you approve of this type of behaviour, well....

 

[jmorg1]

Nice work Angry Dragon. Got plenty of Port supporters rattled as usual.

 

[PAFC2004]

Nice work Angry Dragon. Got plenty of Port supporters rattled as usual.

Don't you think it's a little sad? That people have nothing better to do than annoy others? I'm sure you know all about that.

 

[Asgardian]

Nice work Angry Dragon. Got plenty of Port supporters rattled as usual.

Just because you join in the communal circle tug doesn't make it any less of a jerk off

 

[P.A.F.C]

I'll ask politely again: address the issue. All I've done is point out an inconsistency.

If you thought my thread is offensive or abusive, hit the report button.

You've yet to address this argument that has been put forward quite a few times

It is seriously stupid to compare a person appealing for a free (for having his foot stomped behind play) to someone who goes up to the tribunal and gives false evidence to secure a report against a fellow afl player (it wasnt actually monty who struck him).

Go on.

 

[Toots Hibbert]

You've yet to address this argument that has been put forward quite a few times...

You're making the mistake of trying to have a sensible argument with him. He's not interested in that. His aim is to prove he can be a better smart alec. Different game different rules.

Take a step back and ask yourself whether anyone takes him seriously. Clearly not.

Happy to help.

 

[Slammer]

Nice work Angry Dragon. Got plenty of Port supporters rattled as usual.

It's sure and certain now, jmorg is a deadset dickh*ad!


Birdman = singing canary.

 

[Angry Dragon]

Don't you think it's a little sad? That people have nothing better to do than annoy others? I'm sure you know all about that.

Unless I'm coming around your house banging on the door, then you're annoying yourself.

 

[jmorg1]

And the bites just keep on coming.

 

[Angry Dragon]

Angry Dragon, to deliberately stamp on a players foot after he has kicked a goal is a low mongrel act, particularly if you know the player - Damon White - had a very severe foot/ankle unjury that kept him out of footy for two years.

And if you want to try to compare this with the "Burton Case" you are way off beam.

And if you approve of this type of behaviour, well....

You don't like mongrel acts? Know your clubs history.

Game, set, match.

 

[Ported]

Let, Second Service.

 

[Jumbo]

You don't like mongrel acts? Know your clubs history.

Game, set, match.

Excellent point, PAFC established 1870

 

[Asgardian]

You don't like mongrel acts? Know your clubs history.

Game, set, match.

As Jumbo said, question answered, point proved, Cow supporter acknowledgment of Port Adelaide's long and proud history, dating back to 1870.