If the value of the property falls below the loan amount and you continue regularly making repayments, why would the bank force you to sell?
If banks are going to enforce sales due to cases of negative equity then we could be in for some trouble in 2010 given the number of first home buyers who jumped in in 2009, the sharp rise in house prices, rising interest rates and continued economic uncertainty.
Thats right. That's why a lot of people are predicting a crash. Although I think the massive leverages that the media has spoken about are over exagerated. 4 of my other mates have all brought houses at the 80%lvr mark. Most of the banks were always looking for the 10 - 20% deposit, 5% saved for FHB. I know they did with me minus the 5% saved proof.
Banks are well known for making forced sales even though repayments are being met. During leaner times they don't like the risk of a high leverage. That's why I'll be very reluctant to ever go above 85 - 90% lvr unless I'm extremely confident (if the banks let me as well
).Talking from personal expirience. My cousin went through this expirience with NAB. Lvr went to 105% and they asked him to take it down to 95% which is reasonable. Had to sell, lucky he sold for a reasonable price and had a few thousand let over.






) - $240
