Callum Bartlett - Pick 43 ???

[shell23]

Will Callum Bartlett be still there at pick 43 ??



He has alot of pace and very exiting player with the ball, i think the blues need someone with alot of pace and can open the game up.

 

[Warsaw]

[YOUTUBE]Tim5nU3DwIE[/YOUTUBE]

 

[son of dominator]

Agree , we need a quick player to break the lines. Doubt highly if he'll last to pick 43.
Who knows we may even take him at pick 12. Emma Quayles ranks him 10 so he may be the one we actually pick up at 12, not Black or Talia

 

[Sin City]

Certainly a good player with a great turn of speed, it would be a miracle if he lasted until pick 43 though.

 

[HBF]

If we wanted him, we'd have to take him at #12.

 

[Blueboys7]

Your kidding yourself mate, there is no chance of Bartlett sliding even to the middle of the second round let alone the third round. Please think then post.

 

[Tanks_Alot]

Your kidding yourself mate, there is no chance of Bartlett sliding even to the middle of the second round let alone the third round. Please think then post.

Give him a break, probably didn't know much about the draftees and therefore wanted some info from people on big footy who know better.

 

[Blueboys7]

Give him a break, probably didn't know much about the draftees and therefore wanted some info from people on big footy who know better.

He makes a new thread about each draftee, it's called research and it isn't that hard.

 

[Tanks_Alot]

He makes a new thread about each draftee, it's called research and it isn't that hard.

Bigfooty is a good place to research info about players and draftees. This is probably his form of research.

 

[Blueboys7]

Bigfooty is a good place to research info about players and draftees. This is probably his form of research.

I know I'm not the only one who gets pissed about the constant new threads about a similar topic. This question could have been posed in a number of other threads and isn't a new topic. As I said before - think then post. If he did this then he would find out that Bartlett is rated quite highly and would clearly be gone by pick 43...

 

[Tanks_Alot]

I know I'm not the only one who gets pissed about the constant new threads about a similar topic. This question could have been posed in a number of other threads and isn't a new topic. As I said before - think then post. If he did this then he would find out that Bartlett is rated quite highly and would clearly be gone by pick 43...

I'm not saying you're the only one who gets pissed about things like this, I know it's annoying. But this guy is new to this site and also has every right to use it the way he wants to.

 

[mickelboy182]

I'm not saying you're the only one who gets pissed about things like this, I know it's annoying. But this guy is new to this site and also has every right to use it the way he wants to.

Or he could save the clutter and post in one of the other threads regarding drafting. No need for a thread on each individual player.

 

[Blueboys7]

Or he could save the clutter and post in one of the other threads regarding drafting. No need for a thread on each individual player.

Apparently that is too hard to understand...

 

[Jeremias]

Would be amazed if he was there at pick 43 and would pick him there in an instant if he were available.

Suspect he may well be selected in the first round on Thursday evening. If we really want him, it'll need to be with pick 12, which is certainly a possibility but it's highly unlikely.

 

[C4[2]Yo`DooR]

Im hoping Melksham makes it to #43

 

[DamianBis]

i reckon trengrove might last till 43.. but we might just wait till our last pic to take him

 

[starchamber]

We should instead take Liam on 60 minutes

 

[blueblood25]

We should instead take Liam on 60 minutes

this is confusing, even for you

 

[Blueboys7]

We should instead take Liam on 60 minutes

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I know right

 

[blblues]

Very impressive looking player. Love his turn of speed. I wouldn't be disappointed if we picked him up at 12 going by this video.

[youtube]BLxiAD9Knjw[/youtube]