Recommitted Callum Sinclair - WCE

[Jumpoff Joey]

Hi Guy's

There is a lot of talk about Scott Lycett and its most likely imo Sinclair would be up for trade bait if we were to trade a ruck/KPF

Just curious what his value would be and who would be keen on him if were to do a trade.

 

[Nostradumbass]

What talk about Lycett?

 

[Super Hans]

Would happily take him or Lycett.

 

[Masto]

Sydney want one of our ruckmen for Jetta. They won't get it.

 

[blueiris]

We need a young ruckman to replace Martin if he decided to leave next year maybe he could be part of the Redden trade but I'd prefer Lycett

 

[Swansujelly]

Sydney want one of our ruckmen for Jetta. They won't get it.

are either on them on less than 450,000? If not we can't have them anyway. I would think we are more keen on your first rounder.

 

[Ok Boomer]

As if we would let either walk right now, leaving only two rucks on this list, and McInnes to pinch hit. Madness.

 

[Aussie_boy]

Would be surprising if Sinclair was traded over Lycett, but i'd say both would be worth a 2nd rounder.

 

[MotleyLemon]

I thought Sinclair was the better of he and Lycett, is that not the case?

 

[Big_Birdy]

I thought Sinclair was the better of he and Lycett, is that not the case?

Lycett the higher ceiling, plus is only 23. Sinclair is 28 I think.

Lycett showed a lot in 2014. Has been injured this season.

 

[Altum Volantes]

Sinclair (just turned 26), I would say is about as good as he will get, Lycett has more to work with going forward. Sinclair would be a good get for a team lacking ruck depth but I don't think he'd be a long term #1 ruck man.

I would be stunned if the Eagles traded either of them.

 

[DazzaTys]

Port were interested in Lycett 2014 but he chose to re-sign. I note he only played 6 games this year. Was it form or injuries.?

 

[Altum Volantes]

Port were interested in Lycett 2014 but he chose to re-sign. I note he only played 6 games this year. Was it form or injuries.?

Bit of both to be honest - he finished last year well but his early season form was poor and he deserved to be dropped. He toiled in the WAFL for a while with a few set backs and never really looked like forcing his way back in before his season was put on ice.

A step back this year but I feel he will still make it at WCE.

 

[Schraderbrau]

Yeah Lycett should be a target of any club with diminished ruck stocks. He's got a lot of ability and is not going to be no 1 at WC in the near future.

 

[Sydswans0512]

are either on them on less than 450,000? If not we can't have them anyway. I would think we are more keen on your first rounder.

They both would be lucky to be on 350

 

[ep2018]

are either on them on less than 450,000? If not we can't have them anyway. I would think we are more keen on your first rounder.

You're not getting our first rounder either.

 

[Sydswans0512]

You're not getting our first rounder either.

Yes we are

 

[ioppolo]

No, he's a sort of cult hero this season. Very likeable as well. Extremely handy backup to Naitanui.

 

[Defacto]

well loved at subi, has a lot of close mates still there

surely wce are better off offering up mcinnes

 

[Masto]

well loved at subi, has a lot of close mates still there

surely wce are better off offering up mcinnes

McInnes isn't a ruckman - and as strange as it sounds I think he is required. If Darling or Kennedy go down we need him. He was pretty good in the first part of the year while Darling was injured. He wouldn't command a first and its the wrong draft to trade for mid-round draft picks - maybe next year.

 

[Defacto]

McInnes isn't a ruckman - and as strange as it sounds I think he is required. If Darling or Kennedy go down we need him. He was pretty good in the first part of the year while Darling was injured. He wouldn't command a first and its the wrong draft to trade for mid-round draft picks - maybe next year.

sinclair isnt a ruck either. he's a fwd who can ruck, hence why he's played mainly fwd now with nic nat taking the ruck. for me the number 1 ruck spot is out of lycett and nic nat

so are you saying mcinnes might be seen as a kennedy replacement or darling depth as opposed to a fwd ruck?

 

[Masto]

sinclair isnt a ruck either. he's a fwd who can ruck, hence why he's played mainly fwd now with nic nat taking the ruck. for me the number 1 ruck spot is out of lycett and nic nat

so are you saying mcinnes might be seen as a kennedy replacement or darling depth as opposed to a fwd ruck?

Sinclair holds his own in the ruck against other backup ruckmen. McInnes wouldn't.

 

[Defacto]

Sinclair holds his own in the ruck against other backup ruckmen. McInnes wouldn't.

I agree entirely which is why I think Sinclair is more valuable and McCinnes would be moved on

You don't really have another ruck fwd

Unless you have another trade planned that we don't know about?

 

[Superstar swan]

Strong talk that the swans are very, very keen on sinclair

 

[Defacto]

Strong talk that the swans are very, very keen on sinclair

Would be a massive pick up for them. Tippett into the ruck full time.

They really do need a KPD though