Remove this Banner Ad

Caroline is bleeding.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Maybe the stupidest comment I have ever read, anywhere.:thumbsd:

It's a human right, well at least in the western world, that no matter what you have done, you are innocent until proven guilty, no matter what the crime is.

Or did I miss a change to human and legal rights as a whole?:confused:

In general yes, but not for every law

Some laws have a "reverse onus of proof"

But Rape isn't one of them
 
Rightly or wrongly, I'm hearing Soho has had a very close personal experience of rape.

If that's the case, then it's hard to know what to say. And he's quite right that justice is rarely served for the large number of reasons that he alluded to.

But each case is an individual set of circumstances, and at least this one is in the open now, so hopefully the truth has a chance to get out.
 
Maybe the stupidest comment I have ever read, anywhere

so tell me, how do you prove you said no to some bloke raping you after a night on the sauce, when there are no scars left of your body, no witnesses, and its 4 days before you recover from the trauma and make it to the police station, meaning there is no remaining evidence in your arseh*le...? (thats assuming you're one of the 1% of guys who report being raped, chances are you'd just bottle it and live with the emotional scaring...)

its your word against his, charges are never laid and the case is discontinued due to lack of evidence, just like milne's...

thats what innocent until proven guilty gets you when it comes to rape, and statistics show this time and time again...
 
Rightly or wrongly, I'm hearing Soho has had a very close personal experience of rape.

lol, nah far from it mate... i dont know anyone close to me who's been raped etc... i've just read a few books on it out of interest...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

thats what innocent until proven guilty gets you when it comes to rape, and statistics show this time and time again...

You're right, but you've gone waaaay too far onto the other side of the scale, reel it back in mate. To suggest that because too many cases of rape go unreported we must start considering every single person accused of rape as being guilty is ludicrous, we still have a court of law to determine guilt, it might not be perfect but it is far better than proclaiming someone guilty based on statistical evidence which is basically what you are doing here.

You seem reasonably well educated about the issue so you should already know what happens to people who get tarred with the sex offender brush early in life, the consequences will be very harsh regardless of the outcome of the investigation.
 
i almost certain of two things:

1. rape did occur and the players named are guilty
2. they wont be charged

to say that they havent done anything wrong until they are charged and convicted is to neglect the failures of the legal system when it comes to allegations of rape.

a more appropriate form of action would have been to suspend both players indefinitely (until the investigation has run its course), immediately after the club found out about the allegations... to do nothing is a bit like sticking your head in the sand...

id be perfectly happy with the club sacking both players tomorrow...

What a disgraceful comment. Even if both players are found to be guilty-you and I do not know the facts so why would you be happy to see these two men have their careers and reputations destroyed on the basis of an allegation?

I just read an article in today's Herald Sun which focuses on the outrageous judgments handed down by the Family Court.

One of the most sickening facts was that during the past year, 24 allegations of sexual abuse of the children have been made by wives against former husbands. Of these 24 allegations-23 were proven to be FALSE and one undetermined. These are cold facts. That is clearly a warning for all of the muck raking maggots who get all hot and bothered each time an allegation is made.

Why would you be happy for these young men to be sacked or even suspended before justice has run its course?
 
Sorry, had to laugh at the threat title.:cool:;)

But this part is just plain ****ing stupid.

WTF, the players concerned have done nothing legally wrong, that is what has come out of all this, did I miss something Caro didn't.

Collingwood wants to hold on to the players concerned, while Brisbane and St Kilda - in the case of Lovett - did not. Lovett was suspended by the club two months before he was charged. Just why the AFL so vehemently criticised 3AW's Neil Mitchell for naming the Magpies when it did not do so in the case of Lovett is mystifying.

She is a monumental tool, just trying to stir shit up. Isn't it racing season, shouldn't she be running the track?

Someone feed her some hay so she'll shut the **** up for once.
 
look up laws on rape, and you'll see why statistically, only 20-30% of male-female rapes are reported to authorities, and then why only 15% of those reach trial, and then why only 5% of those end in conviction...

statistically, beams and mccartny have nothing to worry about... that doesnt mean they are innocent...

'innocent until proven guilty' doesnt count when it comes to rape. often there is no evidence remaining, no witnesses, and the emotional scarring is too much of a burden on the victim to both report the case and then re-live the accusations through a lengthy trial...

think about if you were raped by your best mates dad when you were younger. how you would feel about going to the police, telling your parents, going to school and seeing your friends... sometimes its just easier to bottle it up...

here is some night time reading for you:

rape-sex-violence-history-joanna-bourke-hardcover-cover-art.jpg


So what you are saying Soho is that a woman must be taken at her word whenever she opens her mouth and a man must always be taken as aliar when he opens his.

You are a sick , bigoted human being. The world I live in is occupied by people who are good , bad and indifferent. Gender is no indicator of moral superiority despite what haters like you would like to believe. How is judging the veracity of what a person says by the fact they are male or female any less hateful and prejudiced than judging a person by the colour of their skin?

To show the stupidity of your statement I only need to show you one case where a woman has lied about rape to place a large hole in your assertion. Well, there are countless examples of men who have done jail time for rapes they never committed.

Have a look at this you moron.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qoMDbXPwBE8
 
so tell me, how do you prove you said no to some bloke raping you after a night on the sauce, when there are no scars left of your body, no witnesses, and its 4 days before you recover from the trauma and make it to the police station, meaning there is no remaining evidence in your arseh*le...? (thats assuming you're one of the 1% of guys who report being raped, chances are you'd just bottle it and live with the emotional scaring...)

its your word against his, charges are never laid and the case is discontinued due to lack of evidence, just like milne's...

thats what innocent until proven guilty gets you when it comes to rape, and statistics show this time and time again...

Rape is a Very Bad Thing and should never happen but we can't do anything about it until the Full Story comes out - If it ever does
 
She is a monumental tool, just trying to stir shit up. Isn't it racing season, shouldn't she be running the track?

Someone feed her some hay so she'll shut the **** up for once.

Sorry, but I don't get this

You have just published an opinion, you believe you have a right to publish it, that being the case you can't tell someone else they don't have the same right as you.

Caro may well be writing the story as a "sensationalist" piece of work, but as long as its with the law, she is entitled to say it.
Just as you are.

I'm not sticking up for Caro, its just that I'm opposed to a view that says "I don't want you to be able to do the things I believe I have a right to do"
 
yeah, a girls claiming she was raped because she wants attention?

you're an idiot...

its not a question of her integrity, its a question of the players... another reason why most rape cases dont make it to court: the victim's character becomes the center of attention, not that fact that she/he was violated... if this case makes it to court, it will revolve around what she was wearing, how much she had had to drink, who she was kissing, why she went back to the house...

i guess we know where you and spida everitt sit: she wasnt there for a cup of milo, she was there for a group orgy...

um, and for the record, about 5% of rape accusations are found to be false.
You seriously need to get your head out of it. Nobody mentioned HER integrity - instead of ranting from your high horse and reacting READ posts, TWICE I made a serious point of saying that this accusation didn't necessarily fall into the false category but you blindly vent on anyone or anything that seems - in your one track mind at least - to cast doubt on accusers. What about the poor b's who are the 5%??? Those that go through false accusations have no chance of living a normal life ever again that is why innocence is assumed by most fair minded people until proven guilty. Then again there are some close minded individuals who suspend justice for vengeance - aren't there????? Rape is a heinous crime and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Blind hatred and single minded vengeance seeking before the fact guilt is proven is the practice of an unbalanced value set. In the old west it was called a lynch mob.
 
sorry for my earlier post. reading this article turned my night from great to shit. can't stand carolne wilson. she clearly hates eddie and mick and clearly shows in the articles she writes about us. had enough of her crap so i lashed out. if i get a card i'll cop it. she's still a muppet. on the lovett case didn't st kilda name him or he got charged by the cops? these two boys haven't as of yet.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

sorry for my earlier post. reading this article turned my night from great to shit. can't stand carolne wilson. she clearly hates eddie and mick and clearly shows in the articles she writes about us. had enough of her crap so i lashed out. if i get a card i'll cop it. she's still a muppet. on the lovett case didn't st kilda name him or he got charged by the cops? these two boys haven't as of yet.

Just have to watch here make crap up on Footy Classfieds:rolleyes:
 
Didn't ST Kilda sack Lovett because he had been charged? Didn't Montagna and Milne also get charged? Beams and Macca haven't been charged.

I am not sure if Milne and Montanga got Charged or not?
 
no one here is condoning rape. if someone commits that crime then they deserve the full punishment of the law regardless of who they are. every person accused of a crime is innocent until proven guilty according to law, despite what some idiot said on here earlier about that principle being thrown out the window for rape cases. so the law changes for rape cases does it?

in any event, if what i have heard is correct neither beams nor mccarthy have anything to worry about. i cannot say more for obvious reasons, other than it won't be them who come out of all of this looking badly
 
HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT?

Were you there?

Or you guessing?

I hope you right, as not want to sack Beams if charged
 
Rape is a terrible thing.

If players were found guilty, I'd be mortified. At this stage, those involved should be granted the normal course of innocance before/if proved otherwise.

The sad thing is that Caro is using the rape of an innocent woment to push an agenda towards the CFC, McGuire & Malthouse. She is utter slime.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Everyone knows Caro has a personal grudge against Eddie, didn't Eddie stop giving interviews with her for the last 2 years?
The premiership is killing her. She couldn't even get herself to congratulate the Pies and just immediately wants to talk about the Saints. She is just bad, with bad hair
 
Rape is a terrible thing.

If players were found guilty, I'd be mortified. At this stage, those involved should be granted the normal course of innocance before/if proved otherwise.

The sad thing is that Caro is using the rape of an innocent woment to push an agenda towards the CFC, McGuire & Malthouse. She is utter slime.
Agreed the media in this country like to believe themselves news shapers but in reality it's all about crafting a perception with a sensational headline and carefully worded almost illegal accusations. News has nothing to do with their stories. Trash.
 
'innocent until proven guilty' doesnt count when it comes to rape.
You are a ****ing idiot. Yes it does. Prove to me otherwise.

I am not condoning rape. In fact, there was a thread on this board about rape a while ago where I said "rape is a disgusting thing committed by scumbags". I believe that rape is one of the lowest acts a human can commit, but even I'm not stupid enough to assume that people are guilty unless it is proven.

Imagine that you had been accused of rape, when you were innocent. How would you feel being labelled a "rapist" when you knew that you were innocent? And on top of that, how would you feel if you were thrown in jail to rot for eternity when you knew that you hadn't done anything wrong?

Whether you like or not, everyone is innocent until proven guilty, so right now I assume that they are innocent, and unless we find out that they are guilty, so should you.

Here is some night-time reading for you:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotsborough_boys
http://home.earthlink.net/~jamiranda/whyLie.htm
http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume9/j9_3_6.htm
 
innocent until proven guilty doesnt apply to every situation; for example, if you're reported as having thrown a cigarette out the window, you're assumed to be guilty and the onus is on you to prove your innocence... you're welcome to go get up in arms about that...

why is that the case? because collecting evidence for that crime would be IMPOSSIBLE... it would come down to some random saying you through a butt out the window against you saying you didnt... similarly, thats what rape almost always comes down to... obviously a $250 fine is quite different to a jail sentence and the stigma of being labeled a rapist for the rest of your life...

and for all those worried about false accusations and false imprisonments; yes they occur and yes they are wrong, but honestly it would be something like for every 100,000 unpunished cases of rape, there is 1 false punishment... probably even less... you should be more worried about rapists getting away with it, and the system that allows this to happen... and obviously the case we are dealing with is not ex-wife vs. ex-husband jealousy etc... for the record, i think the family courts are shocking in the way they neglect the father's role in a childs life, and almost always award sole custody to the mother (see super dads)

fathers-4-justice.jpg


20081231_superdad_33.jpg


notably, the recent $36m sexual harassment case against the DJ's ceo was settled for around $800,000... why? because the ceo was innocent? unlikely... its more probable that the only evidence that anything ever happened was a few dodgy txt msgs the victim had kept, and that simply wouldnt stand up in court... she would have been advised that she would lose the case base don a lack of substantial hard evidence, and to settle for an insignificant $800k... again, this hardly proves anything, its merely a legal formality. it doesnt prove the ceo's innocence or guilt, it's just a point reached by the legal process.

with the collingwood case, lets hypothesise that the girl in question was seeing someone (or at least thought she was seeing someone) from the group at eve night club. she willingly goes back to the hotel with the group of guys, including the one she feels she is attached with. they get back to the hotel, have a drink, and she and her partner go into a room and have sex. great, everything is good... then half way through, another player comes in and says "my turn" and jumps on the bed and starts to have his way... the partner of the girl (for whatever reason) just allows this to happen... the girl says no repeatedly... eventually the new guy has had enough and leaves the room... no scars are left, he hasnt ejaculated in her, the only witnesses are the 3 people in the room...

now im not suggesting that this has happened, its just an example. but in this case, how would she prove in court that a rape took place? unless her partner is willing to testify that the other bloke came in and that she refused and he went through with it anyway, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that she can legally prove that she was raped... in fact, the legal process would reveal that she had maybe had too much to drink, was wearing a short skirt and was basically 'asking for it'... and if you're an idiot like spida everitt is, you'll think that shes agreed to be gang banged the moment she left eve night club...

if you approve of a system that allows this kind of act to go unpunished, then good for you... but in my opinion, statistics show that the system does not work, and that the laws need to change to reflect this...
 
innocent until proven guilty doesnt apply to every situation; for example, if you're reported as having thrown a cigarette out the window, you're assumed to be guilty and the onus is on you to prove your innocence... you're welcome to go get up in arms about that...

why is that the case? because collecting evidence for that crime would be IMPOSSIBLE... it would come down to some random saying you through a butt out the window against you saying you didnt... similarly, thats what rape almost always comes down to... obviously a $250 fine is quite different to a jail sentence and the stigma of being labeled a rapist for the rest of your life...

and for all those worried about false accusations and false imprisonments; yes they occur and yes they are wrong, but honestly it would be something like for every 100,000 unpunished cases of rape, there is 1 false punishment... probably even less... you should be more worried about rapists getting away with it, and the system that allows this to happen... and obviously the case we are dealing with is not ex-wife vs. ex-husband jealousy etc... for the record, i think the family courts are shocking in the way they neglect the father's role in a childs life, and almost always award sole custody to the mother (see super dads)

fathers-4-justice.jpg


20081231_superdad_33.jpg


notably, the recent $36m sexual harassment case against the DJ's ceo was settled for around $800,000... why? because the ceo was innocent? unlikely... its more probable that the only evidence that anything ever happened was a few dodgy txt msgs the victim had kept, and that simply wouldnt stand up in court... she would have been advised that she would lose the case base don a lack of substantial hard evidence, and to settle for an insignificant $800k... again, this hardly proves anything, its merely a legal formality. it doesnt prove the ceo's innocence or guilt, it's just a point reached by the legal process.

with the collingwood case, lets hypothesise that the girl in question was seeing someone (or at least thought she was seeing someone) from the group at eve night club. she willingly goes back to the hotel with the group of guys, including the one she feels she is attached with. they get back to the hotel, have a drink, and she and her partner go into a room and have sex. great, everything is good... then half way through, another player comes in and says "my turn" and jumps on the bed and starts to have his way... the partner of the girl (for whatever reason) just allows this to happen... the girl says no repeatedly... eventually the new guy has had enough and leaves the room... no scars are left, he hasnt ejaculated in her, the only witnesses are the 3 people in the room...

now im not suggesting that this has happened, its just an example. but in this case, how would she prove in court that a rape took place? unless her partner is willing to testify that the other bloke came in and that she refused and he went through with it anyway, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that she can legally prove that she was raped... in fact, the legal process would reveal that she had maybe had too much to drink, was wearing a short skirt and was basically 'asking for it'... and if you're an idiot like spida everitt is, you'll think that shes agreed to be gang banged the moment she left eve night club...

if you approve of a system that allows this kind of act to go unpunished, then good for you... but in my opinion, statistics show that the system does not work, and that the laws need to change to reflect this...

Highlighted for any one that doesn't need a lesson on Australian Law.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom