Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes V Hawthorn

  • Thread starter Thread starter avishka5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

avishka5

150 game legend.
10k Posts A Star Wars Fan Zombie Lover
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Posts
23,356
Reaction score
28,064
Location
Perth SOR
AFL Club
West Coast
Not too many passengers today so i think there might be no changes this week. Tho i can see simmo trying to get some form into jetta going into finals.
 
Tunbridge May get a week ....which is bullshit and I said that in the game thread also

I reckon bring in ...and you'll laugh ...McGinnity

We need a hard nut v Hawks ....just be an animal
mXyupD1.gif
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Tunbridge May get a week ....which is bullshit and I said that in the game thread also

I reckon bring in ...and you'll laugh ...McGinnity

We need a hard nut v Hawks ....just be an animal

What do people think of the tackle? Looked OK to me. Unfortunate he got injured but I don't see any real problem with the tackle. The player should just drop the ball if he doesn't want to get tackled. The only alternative Tunbridge had was to drop the player rather than sling.
 
I'd like either Nelson or Duggan in for Tunbridge. I don't think Tunbridge deserves any more games with WCE. He just hasn't shown enough.

Hill has been great all year.

Lycett has been a big let down and Sinclair would have been an upgrade.
 
I'd like either Nelson or Duggan in for Tunbridge. I don't think Tunbridge deserves any more games with WCE. He just hasn't shown enough.

Hill has been great all year.

Lycett has been a big let down and Sinclair would have been an upgrade.
A lot of the guys in the game day thread are saying Tunners played well...
 
Tunners is a difficult one - early he was below WAFL level but he grew into the game and showed some poise. It it the end or is there more, I suspect he has had his chances. He worked hard.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

A lot of the guys in the game day thread are saying Tunners played well...

He was worst on ground in the first half - fumbled everything. He struck the ball well on a few occasions in the second half. I think people were just hoping he didn't fumble the ball. He didn't do anything remarkable by any stretch. He definitely improved his performance but he was coming off such a low base. Nelson and Duggan have been much better performers. I don't see Tunbridge being a long term player - others may well disagree.
 
He was worst on ground in the first half - fumbled everything. He struck the ball well on a few occasions in the second half. I think people were just hoping he didn't fumble the ball. He didn't do anything remarkable by any stretch. He definitely improved his performance but he was coming off such a low base. Nelson and Duggan have been much better performers. I don't see Tunbridge being a long term player - others may well disagree.
Rubbish
 
Need an injecton of some mongrel and grunt against the Hawks. Tunbridge in the gun whether reported or omitted, mightn't be a popular decision but with a top 8 spot locked away we've got a chance to rest Wellingham on the dodgy foot if required. Looking at it from the other perpesctive we need experienced defenders for the match ups on Bruest, Rioli and Puopolo.

IN: McGinnity, Nelson (both have that wanted mongrel about them)
OUT: Tunbridge (suspended/ omitted), Wellingham (managed before finals)

Hill saved face a bit in the last quarter but an overall game of 7 touches, 1 behind and 2 tackles is an indication that much more work ethic is required offensively and defensively.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Tunbridge had a few nice i50 kicks, after that sort of win we should go in unchanged.
Although whenever Naitanui has a rest I cringe with Lycett in the ruck


Oddly LYCETT rucks better on his own
which is just bizarre hey

Lycett has credits in the bank
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom