Remove this Banner Ad

Christopher Pyne!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maggie5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You should only go to uni if you get the marks to earn it.

Its not a right.

Agreed.

However, by turning universities into businesses, they will only select people who can afford it, which does nothing for the country as a whole.

University should be allowed to be accessible to anyone who has rightly earned it, no matter what ability to pay for the course is. It's not about making it free, it's making it equal to everyone.
 
University should be allowed to be accessible to anyone who has rightly earned it, no matter what ability to pay for the course is. It's not about making it free, it's making it equal to everyone.

All uni students are up for the same fees (scholarships excepted).
 
All uni students are up for the same fees (scholarsips excepted).

Until Abbott deregulates uni fees, effectively creating haves and have not universities like in America. There will be unis that offer cheap degrees but these will be undervalued compared to the Harvards and Yales of the world (whose students are mainly from richer backgrounds).

This serves to further a class divide. Yes you may get some poorer people who slip through the cracks and get a scholarship to a Harvard type school (scholarships are often given to children with wealthy parents who make a donation to the school to ensure their child gets the scholarship). The poorer kids are shafted and are not given the same level of opportunity as those from rich backgrounds.
 
Until Abbott deregulates uni fees, effectively creating haves and have not universities like in America. There will be unis that offer cheap degrees but these will be undervalued compared to the Harvards and Yales of the world (whose students are mainly from richer backgrounds).

This serves to further a class divide. Yes you may get some poorer people who slip through the cracks and get a scholarship to a Harvard type school (scholarships are often given to children with wealthy parents who make a donation to the school to ensure their child gets the scholarship). The poorer kids are shafted and are not given the same level of opportunity as those from rich backgrounds.

WTF do you bring up Uni's in the US?

I've got the answer!! Do as well as you can in bloody high school.

Now put that in legislation.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I've never agreed with the terminology, which is over the top at best and outright false at worst.

Because it wasn't an entire generation which was stolen, was it?

I see your semantic point, but take it you don't disagree with the fact that what is commonly referred to as the stolen generation happened?

None were. The welfare of the children was first and foremost.

Wow, just wow. Thanks for the reaffirmation that i should not bother taking you seriously at all.
 
WTF do you bring up Uni's in the US?

I've got the answer!! Do as well as you can in bloody high school.

Now put that in legislation.

Because that is the system that Abbott and Pyne are hoping to take us to. Over in America it doesn't matter what results you get in high school. If your daddy is not a big player on Wall Street then you don't get a look in.
 
Because that is the system that Abbott and Pyne are hoping to take us to. Over in America it doesn't matter what results you get in high school. If your daddy is not a big player on Wall Street then you don't get a look in.

OK.
 
Agreed.

However, by turning universities into businesses, they will only select people who can afford it, which does nothing for the country as a whole.

University should be allowed to be accessible to anyone who has rightly earned it, no matter what ability to pay for the course is. It's not about making it free, it's making it equal to everyone.

#destroyingthejoint
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It certainly happened and it didnt just happen to aboriginal kids. Its comprehensively documented which suggests those administering the scheme found it totally acceptable.

Its still happening on some countries where there is a market for human trafficking, and australians are a provider of funds for the market.

Didnt our PM call it winning the lottery of life ?
 
It certainly happened and it didnt just happen to aboriginal kids. Its comprehensively documented which suggests those administering the scheme found it totally acceptable.

Its still happening on some countries where there is a market for human trafficking, and australians are a provider of funds for the market.

Didnt our PM call it winning the lottery of life ?

Such emotive bulldust.

Rather kids live in squalour than have proper care.

Good for you.
 
Such emotive bulldust.

Rather kids live in squalour than have proper care.

Good for you.
I would think it's fair to call someone a racist ****wit if they really thought that taking children from a minority racial group from their parents, and culture by force is a good thing.
 
Such emotive bulldust.

Rather kids live in squalour than have proper care.

Good for you.

Mostly used as defacto slave labour, both the so called stolen generation and the lost generation. But the kids as slaves is not unique. Its right through british history and current affairs in other countries.

The shocking part is it happening so recently, in so called affluent times


If something is supported by documentation, how can it be described as emotive ?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.



and then there was this!

Rofl. What a mental midget we have in Pyne. One of Abbott's elite arseclown. (plural)
Hard to believe the slimey little dog shit got a scholarship to do his honors in Smarm.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom