- Joined
- Oct 2, 2002
- Posts
- 3,306
- Reaction score
- 507
- Location
- * . . port lincoln
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Seattle SuperSonics
I don't see their point in being upset, because when Lleyton played the other day (i forget which day, but it went for 4 hours... ) Home & Away couldn't be played, but the next day they just had it for an hour instead of half an hour.Stiffy_18 said:Very upset my foot.
Home and Away can easily be replayed and it will have no affect of the viewers "emotionally"
If tennis isn't live and you happen to hear the result while watching it then it just isn't the same watching it afterwards. Sport is about emotion and we need to get big matches live.
Home and Away can wait. If those viewers "get very upset" if the Home and Away is not shown for the night then why wouldn't they get upset tonight??????
Bullocks CH7. Absolute Bullocks![]()
People would be happy with the double amount. Live sports like tennis (especially in a final) should always come before a soapie that can get played the next day.








