Remove this Banner Ad

Collingwood Forward Line

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spagger83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Spagger83

Cancelled
Joined
Jul 25, 2006
Posts
516
Reaction score
0
Location
the west
AFL Club
Collingwood
my say for what it's worth (it's just an opinion):

we have an abundance of forwards. for the coaching staff it's a good problem to have. for the players trying to get into the team it's frustrating as they have to wait for their go. for the players in the team it should focus them on performing week in week out or risk being dropped for the forwards that are dominating in the vfl while waiting for their chance.

A forward line can realistically only fit 5-6 players in it.
with 3 (max) being tall marking options in my opinion.

Our forwards over the 187cm (med to tall forward) mark: (in number order)

2- Rusling 190cm : pretty much a leading full forward from goalsquare type, in his 17 games we haven't seen anything else that would say otherwise. relies on his pace and one grab marking. needs to take his chance when he gets it and string some serious games together this year.
has to be make or break year and sorry to say if that shoulder goes again it could be curtains in a lee walker - knee style.
Best 22 prediction: won't get into the team until at least round 3 due to the fact he hasn't even played a pre-season game yet. will need some big numbers at vfl level and hope that the afl forwards are struggling so that he can get a go. he must take his chance.

9- Anthony 192cm : hasn't really put a foot wrong. kicking accuracy means that his selection is almost guarenteed (barring form), has an aggressive attack on the footy and the carrier and is also quite good at ground level. behind play i watch him and he does all the right things which is why he gets the rewards at the end. he creates space then uses that space very well to either lead into himself or let another forward take. very clever and knows how to attract the footy. after being drafted as a backman i doubt we will see him go back there as his forward play is too good. could he be the clubs leading goalkicker in 09??
best 22 prediction: keeps performing and he's done nothing wrong so until then yes, he's in.

15- L Brown 195cm : surely a backup forward option. at fremantle he was purely a defender, at north he was swung back and forward with a career best 7 goals in a match. but at the pies he will most likely be used back or not at all. has a good attack on the footy and the man but decision making is below average and general skills in play aren't the best.
best 22 prediction: no, and even if he plays it should be down back.

20- Reid 195cm : when i saw him live at the richmond nab cup game i was quite surprised on how big he has gotten. he looks to be filling out quite well. another good sign is that even after bulking up he has kept his pace. for a high draft pick i think all collingwood supporters will want to start to see a return in 2009. he has natural ability but needs to string some performances together. he has his admirers and his haters but all that matters to all supporters is his overall performance. he has the ability to play down back aswell which has been tried. but you would have to pick a nice matchup to throw him down there consistantly at this stage of his career. to this point in his 6 senior games he hasn't shown too much, but this is hopefully his breakout year. i have also been surprised with his attack on the footy, last year i thought he was a little tentative, but i see he has improved in that area. his leadup to the wings in a chris tarrant fashion could get his some gametime, he just has to take his chances.
best 22 prediction: possible, based on his versatility and speed.

23- Rocca 195cm : well we all know what Big Anth can do. but we don't know if he still can do it. that's what we will find out this year. i really don't know what to expect from Anthony this year. for someone that's played 238 games and kicked 411 goals he goes into this year virtually as an unknown quantity. can he still roost it, can he still move around?? we will find out. If the younger forwards go past him this year i doubt he will bounce back though. his leadership and team lifting abilities should see him in the side when fit. shouldn't be played unless 100% i think.
best 22 prediction: probable, his sheer size dictates the opposition put an equally sized defender, which should open the way for the 2nd and 3rd forward to do their thing on the lesser defenders. and IF rocca actually is still upto it at afl level then watchout!

30- Macaffer 187cm : i'll start by saying i haven't seen too much of him. but what i have seen he is a natural forward. the thing against him is that at 187cm he is too small for key position. and he has a teamate named paul medhurst that has the "small marking position" all to himself already. so i think medhurst not being able to play is the only way that macaffer will get a go. unless he has another string to his bow like being able to go into the middle for abit and joining our midfield rotation. im not sure of those abilities of his. would look to get a couple of afl games up his sleeve after some good stuff in the vfl over the last 2 years.
best 22 prediction: no, not at this stage. too many ahead of him that would need to fall over.

31- Dawes 193cm : impressed last year when given a call up, and previously at vfl level has dominated games with his marking ability. technically not a great forward however has shown glimpses of some natural footy nouse. we have so many options so with any chance he gets he, like all the others must really take it. to be honest i can't see him and rocca being in the same forward line. looks to be one or the other scenario. at this stage he's still young but he will get a chance in 2009 to show his talents. he could be travis and rocca's backup. then again, if he can show he can lead up to contests and show he has a bigger tank to play as a high forward up around the wings then he could have an advantage over someone like rusling and anthony. it's going to be hard for4 him to play 12+ games this year i feel, and if he does i think it will be a huge bonus for him.
best 22 prediction: no, based on the numbers going for his "tall marking" position

32- Cloke 196cm : certainty barring injury/suspension. in rocca's absence has become the leader of our forward line and has thrived on having the younger, less experienced guys around him. he gets the best defender every week and this rocca hopefully being back and up and about i believe we will see travis take his game to another level this year. anything is a possibility this year and if he's game is on he is due for some big bags of goals. he is getting smarter aswell which is a big bonus, he knows where to attract the footy now and if his use of the ball is spot on he can dominate.
best 22 prediction: certainty, enough said. would be hoping for a year of 60+ goals and 230+marks

we are in a position where we have a good variation:

We have 7. Paul Medhurst who at 179cm he is the shortest tall man in the league if that makes sense. he isnt too much of a crumber, he's more lead and mark actually, which belies his height. at freo he got worked out though where opposition knew that if they put a defender say at 188cm onto him that he could be beaten. last year he showed that he knows how to overcome that now by getting up the ground more and becoming a midfielder/forward when he was getting frozen out of a game. then when they switch back to a small defender he'd take them back to the square for some one on one body stuff which he loves doing. all australian in 2008 and hopefully can back that up.
best 22 prediction: certainty. hopefully crack 50 goals again.

Throw in these guys:
L Davis, McCarthy, Didak, Pendlebury, Thomas, Corrie, Beams, Wellingham, Sidebottom, Lockyer, Dick and Swan and it's really plain to see that from midfield going forward we are in a really really great position to set ourselves up for a flag tilt. We have some blokes that love to attach and if they all gel and really fire up we are close to unstoppable as we saw when we last played the cats.

after all this my best forward line is (when all are 100% fit):

Didak/Davis, Rocca, Cloke, Anthony, Medhurst, McCarthy/Swan.

dont take what i say too seriously, its just the opinion from someone that is just like you, bleeds black and white. whatever the forward line combination that MM goes with i wish them all the best and hope they kick arse! thats why we have a selection committee, good luck to them, it's a hard job.

enjoy and go pies.
(i'll do the backline if you guys want??)
 
Personally, I prefer Cloke, JA and Medhurst as our marking options (like you, I think Medhurst plays as a marking target), with the remaining spots being shared between Lockyer, McCarthy, Davis, Didak, and Thomas (maybe the likes of Wellingham, Sidebottom, and Dick can force themselves into the equation too), all of whom will rotate through the middle. If Reid is on the bench, he can play forward or back according to form and match ups. (Reid's looked serviceable forward and back during the preseason, and that pushes him just ahead of Dawes IMO.)

Medhurst - JA - Lockyer
Didak - Cloke - McCarthy

With Reid on the bench, that's a versatile setup: able to take a mark, yet still super-dangerous and mobile at ground level, which means our defensive pressure will be A-grade. That's key IMV, given how often teams build attacks off HB.
 
Good analysis, but I disagree with the lineup a little.

HF: Didak, Cloke, Lockyer
FF: Medhurst, Rocca, Anthony

Davis and Thomas can rotate through at times.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Swan as a forward? No way, sunshine! The guy is a liability in front of goals.

I prefer to see Swan kick his goals by playing through the midfield.
 
Rocca was in good form when fir last year.

Needs to play high half forward leading laterally across the 50m arc, same way he played Scarlewtt last year. Don't like him planted in the goal sqaure because he stops leading
 
23- Rocca 195cm : well we all know what Big Anth can do. but we don't know if he still can do it. that's what we will find out this year. i really don't know what to expect from Anthony this year. for someone that's played 238 games and kicked 411 goals

Can anybody explain why Pies fans have EVER rated this guy - let alone still do? Sure he's kicked the occasional bag on a day where the opposition doesnt have a big enough backman, to stand him, but all that tellls me that the very ordinary average of 1.7 goals per game is more flattering than it should be.

Or to put it another way even though he's often been the go to forward, IF Rocca gets his career average, and that's a big IF, he might get a whopping 8 more goals for the year than Brad Fisher.

Just can't see what the fuss is about.
 
Can anybody explain why Pies fans have EVER rated this guy - let alone still do? Sure he's kicked the occasional bag on a day where the opposition doesnt have a big enough backman, to stand him, but all that tellls me that the very ordinary average of 1.7 goals per game is more flattering than it should be.

Or to put it another way even though he's often been the go to forward, IF Rocca gets his career average, and that's a big IF, he might get a whopping 8 more goals for the year than Brad Fisher.

Just can't see what the fuss is about.
Rocca takes the no.1 defender. I still believe he is the only reason we beat Geelong last year. He completely took Scarlett out of the game which allowed Cloke to have a weak defender (Taylor) on him. Cloke kicked 5 goals (?) all because of Rocca. Pebs also took Scarlett away from the contest so he wouldn't get any run from half back. Nobody expects him to kick bags of goals but if he can free up Trav and kick goals when needed (when no.1 defender goes onto Trav instead), then I'm happy.:thumbsu:
 
Can anybody explain why Pies fans have EVER rated this guy - let alone still do? Sure he's kicked the occasional bag on a day where the opposition doesnt have a big enough backman, to stand him, but all that tellls me that the very ordinary average of 1.7 goals per game is more flattering than it should be.

Or to put it another way even though he's often been the go to forward, IF Rocca gets his career average, and that's a big IF, he might get a whopping 8 more goals for the year than Brad Fisher.

Just can't see what the fuss is about.

Hasn't rocca when fit made a habbit of kicking bags on the rabble that was known as Carlton for much of this decade. Sure his past few years have been dissapointing because he has been injured and is past 30. However at his best he was next to Buckley our most important player. Comparing him to Brad Fisher suggests that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Back to our forward line. IMO it is the best in the AFL. I salivate when I think of how much depth there is. It really is umbelievably good the depth. Here goes...

Didak Cloke Thomas

Medhurst Anthony Rocca

I would rest Swan, Davis and Pendles in the forward line. Possibly could rest Sidebottom, Beams and McCathry down there in the future too. Fraser can also rest there from the ruck and he is very very good in the forward line.

Than there are the plethora of youngsters that show plenty of promise, that could have long careers in our forward line. Dick, Maccafer, Dawes, Rusling who I havn't put in the team. Put simply this is the best forward line Collingwood have ever had that I have seen. And the best in the AFL. Including Hawthorn's. (they do have Franklin but we have more depth including better more goal hungry midfielders in Davis, pendles and Swan).
 
Rocca takes the no.1 defender. I still believe he is the only reason we beat Geelong last year. He completely took Scarlett out of the game which allowed Cloke to have a weak defender (Taylor) on him. Cloke kicked 5 goals (?) all because of Rocca. Pebs also took Scarlett away from the contest so he wouldn't get any run from half back. Nobody expects him to kick bags of goals but if he can free up Trav and kick goals when needed (when no.1 defender goes onto Trav instead), then I'm happy.:thumbsu:

sums up exactly what i wrote in the original post. when fit he's a major benefit to our whole forward line.
 
Can anybody explain why Pies fans have EVER rated this guy - let alone still do? Sure he's kicked the occasional bag on a day where the opposition doesnt have a big enough backman, to stand him, but all that tellls me that the very ordinary average of 1.7 goals per game is more flattering than it should be.

Why do we rate the big lug? Well, um, if he can't mark the ball inside 50 he brings it down to our many crumbers, he brings a big physical presence to our forward line and he takes the number defender which helps our younger inexperienced key forwards such as Cloke.

It's pretty evident you don't know anthying about Rocca's career when you're using his goal kicking statistics in your argument. Anthony Rocca spent the start of his career at CHF and part time in the ruck which would have meant he he would have less shots at goal. Why didn't he play at FF, two words, Saverio Rocca.

Or to put it another way even though he's often been the go to forward, IF Rocca gets his career average, and that's a big IF, he might get a whopping 8 more goals for the year than Brad Fisher.

Um, what drivel are you talking about? In the past 3 years Rocca has averaged 2.3 goals a game. Going by that statistic he should kick around 50 goals if he plays all 22 rounds.

Just can't see what the fuss is about.

Of course you can't! You're just another opposition supporter that under rates the Collingwood players!

Some additional info about Rocca. In 99' he won 116 hit outs, 114 in 00', 100 in 01', 130 in 02' and 107 in 2003. How many KPP forwards can do that?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Can anybody explain why Pies fans have EVER rated this guy - let alone still do? Sure he's kicked the occasional bag on a day where the opposition doesnt have a big enough backman, to stand him, but all that tellls me that the very ordinary average of 1.7 goals per game is more flattering than it should be.

Or to put it another way even though he's often been the go to forward, IF Rocca gets his career average, and that's a big IF, he might get a whopping 8 more goals for the year than Brad Fisher.

Just can't see what the fuss is about.


i thought i clicked the box that said "would you like to make this thread imbecile eg:carlton fan free?"
i'm sorry to everyone that i didn't click in that box.

oh well, at least we can have a thread called "collingwood forward line", whereas they can only have a thread called "brendan fevola"

go pies!
 
Comparing him to Brad Fisher suggests that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

I'm taking the p1ss a little. A key forward's job is to kick goals and in the end that's the only measure. You might get bonus points for intangible contribution, but in Big Sav's case you can take tham away again because he's slow, lazy and one dimensional. No amount of bonus points gets past the very poor 1.7 average from an old school full forward. That type of player has to score much more than that.

Put simply this is the best forward line Collingwood have ever had that I have seen. And the best in the AFL. Including Hawthorn's. .

Now you're taking the p1ss. Nothing even close to Franklin. Even with the crumbs from the table Roughhead is a far more potent threat than anybody in your forward half.

It's fairly widely agreed that the Hawks forward line is the best since Brisbane was at its peak. Pies don't even go close, and just like last year if the midfielders dont kick a bag - goodnight Pies.
 
I'm taking the p1ss a little. A key forward's job is to kick goals and in the end that's the only measure. You might get bonus just like last year if the midfielders dont kick a bag - goodnight Pies.
We have a wide spread of goal kickers, unlike your mob. No Fev no Blues. Its quite simple
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's fairly widely agreed that the Hawks forward line is the best since Brisbane was at its peak. Pies don't even go close, and just like last year if the midfielders dont kick a bag - goodnight Pies.
Which midfielders might these be?
 
Now you're taking the p1ss. Nothing even close to Franklin. Even with the crumbs from the table Roughhead is a far more potent threat than anybody in your forward half..

We don't have Franklin agreed. But I'd take Cloke over Roughhead. And i'd also prefer our smalls over the Dawks comfortably. Didak, Medhurst, Davis, Thomas... They can't match those. (Don't mention Williams he gets in the way of Franklin now he is the go too man). Than there is the third tall that is better than their third tall (Anthony). Rocca will be very handy taking the number one. We can rest Pendles, Swan, Lockyer and Fraser down there too.

It's fairly widely agreed that the Hawks forward line is the best since Brisbane was at its peak. Pies don't even go close, and just like last year if the midfielders dont kick a bag - goodnight Pies.

This Collingwood forward line is sublime. It WILL be a talking point throughout the year. I guess, that is the point of this thread. ;)
 
Rocca takes the no.1 defender. I still believe he is the only reason we beat Geelong last year. He completely took Scarlett out of the game which allowed Cloke to have a weak defender (Taylor) on him. Cloke kicked 5 goals (?) all because of Rocca. Pebs also took Scarlett away from the contest so he wouldn't get any run from half back. Nobody expects him to kick bags of goals but if he can free up Trav and kick goals when needed (when no.1 defender goes onto Trav instead), then I'm happy.:thumbsu:

sums Pebels up perfectly. Plus I do think Rocca had just fully recovered from a minor injury he sustained in the 2007 Prelim Final in that bulldogs game when he got injured. I have no doubt if he had not of got injured he would have kicked at least 5 that night and we probably would have one the game
 
But...but...wing....it's my destiny...

MMOpti, put this man on a wing - he's earned it.:thumbsu:

I think it was Paddywackers who dared describe our forward line as "sublime" above. I'll second that. When they're all up and running we'll have a cornucopia of options.
 
HF: Didak, Cloke, Medhurst
FF: Rusling, Rocca, Anthony

Some may say too tall. I disagree. Didak and Medhurst as the crumbers, with Davis, Thomas, Lockyer and Swann pushing forward.

Hawthorn have Franklin and Roughead as their big talls. After that the scoring is kinda spread. Imagine a backline trying to stop the talls: Cloke, Rocca and the Midsized: Rusling, Anthony. I'd love to see that.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom