Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory Coronavirus #2: Lockdowns

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Thoughts on COVID-19? (Choose 2 options)

  • It's a naturally occurring virus

    Votes: 15 20.3%
  • It came from a Chinese laboratory

    Votes: 31 41.9%
  • It came from a US/other laboratory

    Votes: 5 6.8%
  • It's dangerous and harsh restrictions are necessary

    Votes: 19 25.7%
  • It's not dangerous enough to warrant harsh restrictions

    Votes: 22 29.7%
  • It's basically another flu, so restrictions are silly

    Votes: 14 18.9%

  • Total voters
    74

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
My point exactly. Replace him and you are arguing degrees but still lockdown. (I still agree with others that he is ott and needs to be replaced).
You need someone outside the system. All those inside have been bought off and are following orders.

In a way it is how we live/choices and necessity. We all need money and are after it yet people will follow whatever path that gives them bang for their buck. We do it all the time. We follow stuff or spin bullshit to sell something to survive. It's a matter of degrees. Why I don't hold out much hope.
The US had that and they threw everything including the kitchen sink to get him out.
 
“ Premier Daniel Andrews says it is "too early" to confirm the lockdown will end at midnight on Wednesday”.

Lol, here we go...

VMRHdS1.jpg
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There is so much truth into the sheep/losers/karens/covid cheerleaders psyche here.



"WHY ARENT YOU WEARING YOUR MASK?!"
If youre so worried and panicked, why arent you home?

In before Hawkie or someone, "discredit everything because its on that podcast and not MY approved podcasts. No matter how true it is"
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It's a shame that conspiracy theorists don't seem to have a basic understanding of the maths... not at all surprising though.

Like a mortality rate of around 0.01% for healthy people under 50.
Especially the kids, whose mortality rate is minuscule.
But lock em all up hey?
In time lockdowns will be looked back on as one the dumbest things ever done.

Lockdowns smash the lower socioeconomic bracket the most.
 
Like a mortality rate of around 0.01% for healthy people under 50.
Especially the kids, whose mortality rate is minuscule.
But lock em all up hey?
In time lockdowns will be looked back on as one the dumbest things ever done.

Lockdowns smash the lower socioeconomic bracket the most.

Or the maths that says death rates all around the world that were no higher in 2020 than previous years. But, yeah, keep believing what the pollies, the bureaucrats and media are telling you without using your brain.
 
It's a shame that conspiracy theorists don't seem to have a basic understanding of the maths... not at all surprising though.
Instead of the passive aggressive barbs, why don't you give us your number 1, slam dunk proof that lockdowns (in particular over minuscule cases), are the best scientifically proven response?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Instead of the passive aggressive barbs, why don't you give us your number 1, slam dunk proof that lockdowns (in particular over minuscule cases), are the best scientifically proven response?
"It's actually safer to send as many people as possible to the brink of ruin rather than risk them getting a cold" - Andrews supporters, as they try and remember the script using their very smooth brain
 
It's not the worlds top scientists and doctors governments are listening to!

The same playbook of big pharma and the money behind it was called out in 2009 and in flu and corona outbreaks before that. However there was still enough independent media to point it out and support the worlds top scientists and doctors so the ridiculous fear narrative based on fake science didn't proceed.

But please, line up for your two experimental injections of genetic organisms and tell us how it went. Have you had kids yet? They do recommend to save you sperm just in case.
 
Instead of the passive aggressive barbs, why don't you give us your number 1, slam dunk proof that lockdowns (in particular over minuscule cases), are the best scientifically proven response?

We have been through lockdowns, the US mostly hasn't. One has near 0 cases, the other is a complete sh1tshow.
 
"It's actually safer to send as many people as possible to the brink of ruin rather than risk them getting a cold" - Andrews supporters, as they try and remember the script using their very smooth brain

Do ICU's have to expand 3 times their normal size because of people presenting with "a cold"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom