- May 28, 2016
- 17,523
- 26,982
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Banned
- #4,026
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do they give the Hepatitis B vaccine at birth when they are more likely to require it from adulthood, with an efficacy of no more than 8 years.not at all - just read my post carefully and you’ll understand it’s got nothing to do with the meme you replied with.
My point was unVaxxed kids benefit from the decision of responsible parents to Vaccinate their children. They do it first and foremost for their children’s protection, and nothing else.
Three people my xwife worked with went to get the chicken pox vax as work encouraged and funded vaxxing. They were in their 30s to 40s went down together, they all caught chickenpox from the vax, swear on my kids.I was in my mid 20s so over 30 years ago now, I do remember being itchy and miserable, nowhere near the worst thing I have experienced re health though.
Note- I was vaccinated against chicken pox as a child.
Many of us would like to blink and say 'hey presto!' and it all goes away. Like the magic in turning the TV off.
You must be mentally fragile to take BlueE’s post as a slur.None of this diatribe enhances your credibility or the diminishes the clear and irrefutable points I’ve made.
It just reinforces that I’m living in your head rent free.
Stop being childish - slurs and name calling are for the play ground.
Or maybe the playground is where you belong?
What happens after 6 months?people care about getting, sick, hospitalized and dying - the study shows that despite waning immunity, there is 90% protection against hospitalization and death.
They are exactly the events people want protection from - thereby rendering your waning immunity narrative completely irrelevant.
So redacting the most important part of the quote was disingenuous- end of debate.
I have wondered more than once if they are 16?So what are your thoughts on vaccinating kids?
Wtf ..
All liars and Big Pharma control and reward the regulators for approving their products.
Do you think he will resign for the same reason that Gladys went? Or just had enough and step aside?
If the election was today Andrews would win easily IMO. There are enough brainwashed sheep to vote him back in.
Or do you think he might have another fall down the stairs and be forced to step aside? Haha, one could only hope.
But kids being vaxxed isn't going to stop them from spreading it to vulnerable family members and others in the community. As for focusing on vaxxing the vulnerable and the elderly. That's how the rollout began, but here we are where people's livelihoods are being threatened unless they take it. You think the safety issues are overblown. There's been other vaccines that have been pulled from market with a much smaller death rate attributed to them.A very complicated issue eg.
- If the Adult population is over 90% Vaccinated then that “herd^”
immunity should protect kids
- however, some kids are themselves immunocompromised , vulnerable or live is households with high risk family members.
- what about the school/sporting club environment, and high risk adults/students/players
The safety issues are overblown, so that’s less of a consideration.
On balance it’s better to focus resources on elderly and high risk people that would otherwise be used on on healthy kids.
* 12 and over
^ I know the Vaccine is not perfect
Covid19 and the flu will have the one same vaccine for both within months in the US.Who is prepared to admit that they will be taking Covid booster shots every 6 months or so..... or annually?
IMO it will end up like the seasonal Flu vaccine, roughly 50% of people will elect to get jabbed, I also think vaccine passports for everyday life activities like shopping, dining will fade away within a pretty short timeframe.
What happens after 6 months?
Pfizer has almost zero effectiveness against infection after 5 months and variable effect, ranging from 10% to 90% for serious infection, after 6 months.
You can't say there is 90% protection after 6 months, especially when the authors warn "These findings suggest that a large proportion of the vaccinated population could lose its protection against infection in the coming months, perhaps increasing the potential for new epidemic waves."
Once again you expose yourself if you think this is my "waning immunity" narrative, which incorrectly in your mind, is completely irrelevant.
Keep building the strawman arguments because that is all you've got, beside unnecessary repeatedly gaslighting and having to be propped up.
Just your average bf poster..