Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually had a guy a work start talking to me the other day how it was man made virus, because the structure of it doesn't look natural etc etc
Just had to walk away. No point engaging in that conversation.
And yes, the same person a month or two ago was firmly in the camp that it is a global conspiracy & coverup & 5G is what is making us sick.
Just had to walk away. No point engaging in that conversation.
Part of it is to feel superior, part of it is because it fits a convenient opinion for them to have.
Surprised how many tin foil hat wearers there are actually amongst us, be alert.
One in eight Australians believe 5G is spreading coronavirus, poll shows
New polling shows one in eight Australians buy into conspiracy theories coronavirus is linked to 5G, with nearly half saying the virus is from a Chinese lab.www.sbs.com.au
I just keep remembering a past discussion about potential vaccine development for coronavirus.I think that's overstating things for a number of reasons.
1) There wasn't the pressing need combined with technological advances that we have today. Vaccines really could be out in the next twelve months. Historic examples aren't particularly relevant.
2) While coronaviruses might not trigger long lasting immunity, that's a) not the same as a vaccine (nasal passage vs bloodstream), and b) long lasting immunity isn't the be all and end all - yearly Covid 19 vaccines will allow us to reach the equivalent of herd immunity without the same mass deaths required without a vaccine.
I just keep remembering a past discussion about potential vaccine development for coronavirus.
We haven’t been able to find a vaccine for the common cold or previous coronavirus.
My personal view is, if Victoria can sort it’s sh!t out, and Australia can effectively eradicate the virus, we’ll open most things up fully. But keep our international borders mostly closed.
We’re not closing off trade. We’d just be stopping non-essential travel.Why not seems to work for Nth Korea.
There has even been debate about whether a vaccine is possible for COVID-19, given no human coronavirus vaccine has ever been produced.
"There’s one for chickens!" says (Peter) Doherty, betraying his veterinary origins. "My wife and I both worked on it about 50 years ago!" He laughs.
"But no, seriously, you hear this thing about ‘no vaccines for coronavirus’, but in fact they were making a lot of progress with both MERS and SARS vaccines.
The reason they didn’t go anywhere was basically because SARS burnt out, and although MERS still grumbles away, it only infects about 200 people a year.
There’s just no big impetus with that level of infection."
We’re not closing off trade. We’d just be stopping non-essential travel.
And there would be mandatory, government monitored 2 weeks quarantine for anyone landing in Australia. So people will think long and hard about international travel for the foreseeable future.
UQ project co-leader Professor Paul Young said the results were an excellent indication that the vaccine worked as expected.
“This is what we were hoping for, and it’s a great relief for the team given the tremendous faith placed in our technology by CEPI, Federal and Queensland Governments and our philanthropic partners,” Professor Young said.
“We were particularly pleased that the strength of the antibody response was even better than those observed in samples from COVID-19 recovered patients.”
Saucery & briztoon, have a look at this article from last weekend - it certainly seems to paint a different picture:
One Shot To Change The World
Few tweets from Peter Doherty on the matter toose
And re: the comment about not having a vaccine against the common cold yet, this seems to be the reason why:
Also, the current UQ vaccine effort has produced more antibodies than recovered patients even have in their blood - so immunity would be higher than it is for recovered patients, which is already looking very high.
UQ COVID-19 vaccine shown to induce potent protective response in pre-clinical trials
The SMH article basically says we have so many people working on this we must prevail, whilst acknowledging:
"Even vaccines are not without problems. In the past, work on vaccines for other coronaviruses (such as MERS and SARS) has raised questions regarding the strength and longevity of vaccine-produced immunity; and about the negative impacts of a vaccine on the immune system. There has even been debate about whether a vaccine is possible for COVID-19, given no human coronavirus vaccine has ever been produced."
And as for Prof Doherty you do realise he is a veterinarian?
The SMH article basically says we have so many people working on this we must prevail, whilst acknowledging:
"Even vaccines are not without problems. In the past, work on vaccines for other coronaviruses (such as MERS and SARS) has raised questions regarding the strength and longevity of vaccine-produced immunity; and about the negative impacts of a vaccine on the immune system. There has even been debate about whether a vaccine is possible for COVID-19, given no human coronavirus vaccine has ever been produced."
And as for Prof Doherty you do realise he is a veterinarian?
Sorry to have upset veterinarians out there, but still try to keep some perspective. Your optimism for a vaccine is disproportionate to the general consensus of epidemiologist out there, specialists in this field. I am happy to feel more positive about the chances of a vaccine that will wipe out CV19 like small pox, yet its long incubation period, coupled with the growing evidence that it can be recontacted within weeks, leads me believe we are just not getting our heads around how epoch changing this plague is.
When there is disagreement amongst the experts, it reveals why it's not worth putting all your eggs in one expert's basket. It's good to hear what both Doherty, Heymann, Fraser, and others have to say.
Wrt to borders. Borders between some countries that are moving towards herd immunity are already opening up - there's no longer much point keeping them closed. (Air travel is different however, borders in Europe can open without air travel, as planes appear to be a fantastic way to spread a virus).
But of course, we are not a country moving towards herd immunity, or a country that can be reached in a car. Listening to some of the state premiers (Qld, SA and WA especially) they are not keen on opening borders to even NSW + VIC without an entire month of 0 active cases (and that won't happen for a long long while). So it seems the idea of welcoming tourists from Europe or America without a vaccine is entirely off the table. Probably the best we can hope for is that we will be stuck in a bubble with New Zealand, perhaps some Pacific Island nations, and perhaps South Korea, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Even if we wait the 2-3 years it will take for the virus to burn through everywhere else in the world, it will still linger around for quite a while. Given we are left with a 100% susceptible population, there's not a lot of room for us to manoeuvre. We've backed ourselves into a corner by doing so well at controlling the virus. If there's no vaccine, we may be forced to exist in relative isolation for years.
I apologise if I'm mulling over stuff that's already been said, I'm just trying to get it straight in my head, as I have an immense vested interest in seeing borders open asap. That's how I see it - does anyone see it differently?
No this is a good post. Herd immunity requires between 70-90% of the population to have contracted the virus? Even in Sweden, who never enacted any lock down, believe that only 7.3 % of the population in the capital Stockholm have contracted the disease. Your point about our population being nearly 100% susceptible is frighteningly true. This is just the beginning.
Growing evidence that positive tests weeks after being cured appear to not be contagious. They are likely false positives caused by lingering dead virus cells.
COVID-19 patients testing positive for second infection not contagious, study shows
Researchers in Korea found evidence that patients who test positive for COVID-19 a second time aren’t capable of infecting others, and may have neutralizing antibodies that protect them from …thehill.com
Recovered patients who tested positive for COVID-19 likely not reinfected
This phenomenon is likely due to the shortcomings of the coronavirus test, experts saywww.livescience.com
Dead virus fragments are causing COVID-19 reinfection false positives
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has ravaged across the globe, infecting a staggering 3.5 million people, and taking over 251,000 lives. One of the most significant concerns in this global pandemic is the possibility of reinfection as previous reports in South Korea and Japan show people...www.news-medical.net
I’m a big believer in the sentiment that cynicism always comes dressed as realism.
I know your belief is that you have a realistic perspective on the situation and where we’re going, but it seems way out of step with every expert opinion & every nation’s approach.
Actually my wife and I were just discussing this, people don’t NEED to come here for education.Australia's third highest export is education, people need to come here for that. Fifth is travel, added together they make up 13% of our income. Thats a pretty big slice to just throw in the dumpster.