Welcome to East Germany COVID 19 WAS PLANNED TO BRING IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER. ** DEBUNKED

[BlueE]

Aus have seen no significant increase in cardiac related deaths this year compared to 2015-19

Provisional Mortality Statistics, Jan - Feb 2024

Provisional deaths data for measuring changes in patterns of mortality

www.abs.gov.au

Don't forget Aust introduced jabs around 6 months after UK so if the British Heart Foundation just announced 30 K excess cardiac deaths that is a strong signal and of what Aust will find.

Some interesting facts in the provisional Aust data, In first 6 months of 2022, 17 percent more deaths (16,375), more than the historic average.

Deaths 20 percent above Ave for dementia and and 21 percent increase in deaths due to diabetes.

 

[BlueE]

View attachment 1550280

So this guy believes his much maligned diet will help cure COVID.

Sounds a very unbiased and reputable source.....

Says the poster who selectively edited a biased source for a Professor of Evidence Based Medicine, consultant cardiologist, global specialist in diagnosing, preventing, and managing heat disease who publically supported getting jabbed, highlighting dangers caused by excess sugar consumption, particularly it's role in type 2 diabetes and obesity.

 

[BlueE]

Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Setting | NEJM
“The vaccine was associated with an excess risk of myocarditis (1 to 5 events per 100,000 persons). The risk of this potentially serious adverse event and of many other serious adverse events was substantially increased after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Quoting old study that despite admitting a known elevated rIsk for young men didn't quantify for age or sex.

Subjects not randomly assigned which they admit may have a introduced baseline confounding and selection bias and excluded certain populations that could be at high risk for certain adverse events.

More up to date peer reviewed studies have been published showing risks of 1 to 2600 or more, but others that Pfizer was ordered to do because of accepted myocarditis risks, won't be completed for one to three years.

 

[mxett]

Don't forget Aust introduced jabs around 6 months after UK so if the British Heart Foundation just announced 30 K excess cardiac deaths that is a strong signal and of what Aust will find.

Some interesting facts in the provisional Aust data, In first 6 months of 2022, 17 percent more deaths (16,375), more than the historic average.

Deaths 20 percent above Ave for dementia and and 21 percent increase in deaths due to diabetes.

Excess cardiac deaths in the UK were higher in 2020 and have been steadily dropping. They arent caused by the vaccine, they are caused by a combination of acute covid, cardiovascular sequalae from COVID after recovery, delayed diagnosis and treatments due to the pandemic and measures, and strain on healthcare resources

The Aus excess deaths are non age or population adjusted. Once this is accounted for the cardiac, stroke and cancer deaths are either stable or dropping

 

[mxett]

Quoting old study that despite admitting a known elevated rIsk for young men didn't quantify for age or sex.

Subjects not randomly assigned which they admit may have a introduced baseline confounding and selection bias and excluded certain populations that could be at high risk for certain adverse events.

More up to date peer reviewed studies have been published showing risks of 1 to 2600 or more, but others that Pfizer was ordered to do because of accepted myocarditis risks, won't be completed for one to three years.

The myocarditis risk from the vax is very small given most cases are mild and recovery is quick

 

[MisterMarcus]

Says the poster who selectively edited a biased source for a Professor of Evidence Based Medicine, consultant cardiologist, global specialist in diagnosing, preventing, and managing heat disease who publically supported getting jabbed, highlighting dangers caused by excess sugar consumption, particularly it's role in type 2 diabetes and obesity.

The British Heart Foundation is a 'biased source' but some guy who promotes his own diet as a cure for COVID is unbiased and truthful.

Makes enormous sense to me.

 

[BlueE]

Study Links COVID-19 Infection With Elevated Risk of Poor Cardiovascular Health, Death

The results showed that these participants were more than 27 times as likely to develop VTE, more than 21.5 times as likely to be diagnosed with heart failure, and 17.5 times as likely to have a stroke.

www.pharmacytimes.com

Limitations to the study include that it was observational, so no definitive conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect. Additionally, the analysis did not consider other potentially influential factors, such as the impact of vaccination, new virus variants, or serial infections.

 

[BlueE]

The British Heart Foundation is a 'biased source' but some guy who promotes his own diet as a cure for COVID is unbiased and truthful.

Makes enormous sense to me.

Wot?

Dr Malhotra quoted British Heart Foundation reporting 30,000 excess deaths specifically because of coronary artery disease and thousands more due to heart failure and strokes.

You quoted a biased, unknown sourced attack on his books against the excessive consumption of sugar in the diet.

 

[BlueE]

The myocarditis risk from the vax is very small given most cases are mild and recovery is quick

Seriously??

A diagnosis of myocarditis is known to result in 10% deaths after one year and 50% after five. These are survival rates have not changed over the last 30 years of research.

There is heart damage and scaring that occurs, no matter how mild.

Wilful ignorance.

But many people and sadly young people, are just dropping dead from 'unknown causes', far more that those who've been diagnosed with myocarditis.

This is not normal.

 

[BlueE]

 

[BlueE]

Excess cardiac deaths in the UK were higher in 2020 and have been steadily dropping. They arent caused by the vaccine, they are caused by a combination of acute covid, cardiovascular sequalae from COVID after recovery, delayed diagnosis and treatments due to the pandemic and measures, and strain on healthcare resources

The Aus excess deaths are non age or population adjusted. Once this is accounted for the cardiac, stroke and cancer deaths are either stable or dropping

Where is the link showing excess cardiac deaths in the UK were higher in 2020 and have been steadily dropping?

"Multi factorial for sure but we now have mechanistic, RCT & associational data linking the mRNA product to cardiovascular events. It’s likely a primary driver." "Until proven otherwise" Dr Malhotra

 

[HeathySure]

Limitations to the study include that it was observational, so no definitive conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect. Additionally, the analysis did not consider other potentially influential factors, such as the impact of vaccination, new virus variants, or serial infections.

I have to laugh that you posted this when you just keep posting stuff that is also observational. You will not accept any proof that the vaccine does not cause excess deaths no matter what because its all a conspiracy. There is no hope for you.

 

[BlueE]

I have to laugh that you posted this when you just keep posting stuff that is also observational. You will not accept any proof that the vaccine does not cause excess deaths no matter what because its all a conspiracy. There is no hope for you.

 

[mxett]

Wot?

Dr Malhotra quoted British Heart Foundation reporting 30,000 excess deaths specifically because of coronary artery disease and thousands more due to heart failure and strokes.

You quoted a biased, unknown sourced attack on his books against the excessive consumption of sugar in the diet.

He's completely wrong

 

[mxett]

Seriously??

A diagnosis of myocarditis is known to result in 10% deaths after one year and 50% after five. These are survival rates have not changed over the last 30 years of research.

There is heart damage and scaring that occurs, no matter how mild.

Wilful ignorance.

But many people and sadly young people, are just dropping dead from 'unknown causes', far more that those who've been diagnosed with myocarditis.

This is not normal.

Wrong - many cases of myocarditis are mild. This means full recovery and no damage

“Myocarditis is generally a mild and self-limited consequence of systemic infection of cardiotropic viruses”
Management of Myocarditis-Related Cardiomyopathy in Adults

Vax induced myocarditis is even more likely to be mild and self limiting

 

[BlueE]

Wrong - many cases of myocarditis are mild. This means full recovery and no damage

“Myocarditis is generally a mild and self-limited consequence of systemic infection of cardiotropic viruses”
Management of Myocarditis-Related Cardiomyopathy in Adults

Vax induced myocarditis is even more likely to be mild and self limiting

Myocarditis is a serious heart condition causing permanent scarring of the heart . It is not mild in the normal use of mild, because heart damage occurs as shown by MRI months after a 'mild' diagnosis. All diagnosed myocarditis, whether mild or not was included in the research of deaths after myocarditis over the last 30 years.

It was suggested that the more serious or the younger the person is when diagnosed, the worse the prognosis.

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic's observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%.

Myocarditis

Depending on the cause and extent of myocardial damage, the mortality rate is up to 20% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years. Despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in the last 30 years.

Viral Myocarditis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

The FDA identified unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis after mRNA jabs and ordered Pfizer to conduct RCTs, and until they're finished and reported on,

"We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies: Numbered 4-9 to be completed between 2023 and 2027.

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:
10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.” First human trial to be completed in 2025.

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

 

[MisterMarcus]

Even a cursory Google of his name brings up a large number of articles from fellow scientists and doctors, debunking and strongly criticising this Malhotra guy's claims:

UK cardiologist misleads on Covid-19 vaccine safety

A cardiologist from the United Kingdom says Covid-19 vaccines should be suspended because they pose a greater threat than the virus itself. This is false; experts say his research misleads on the risks of vaccination by cherry-picking evidence and relying on flawed studies, and public health...

factcheck.afp.com

Article by cardiologist Aseem Malhotra made unsupported claims about the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination

Scientific evidence from clinical trials and safety monitoring indicate that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. While severe reactions to the vaccine can occur, they are rare, and the most common side effects of vaccination are mild and go away within a few days. All available...

healthfeedback.org

“I know you are, but what am I?” Dr. Aseem Malhotra rails against COVID-19 “misinformation”

Projection is a common defense mechanism used by those spreading health misinformation and disinformation. Last week Dr. Aseem Malhotra published part 2 of a plan to cure "the pandemic of misinformati

sciencebasedmedicine.org

 

[HeathySure]

Even a cursory Google of his name brings up a large number of articles from fellow scientists and doctors, debunking and strongly criticising this Malhotra guy's claims:

UK cardiologist misleads on Covid-19 vaccine safety

A cardiologist from the United Kingdom says Covid-19 vaccines should be suspended because they pose a greater threat than the virus itself. This is false; experts say his research misleads on the risks of vaccination by cherry-picking evidence and relying on flawed studies, and public health...

factcheck.afp.com

Article by cardiologist Aseem Malhotra made unsupported claims about the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination

Scientific evidence from clinical trials and safety monitoring indicate that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. While severe reactions to the vaccine can occur, they are rare, and the most common side effects of vaccination are mild and go away within a few days. All available...

healthfeedback.org

“I know you are, but what am I?” Dr. Aseem Malhotra rails against COVID-19 “misinformation”

Projection is a common defense mechanism used by those spreading health misinformation and disinformation. Last week Dr. Aseem Malhotra published part 2 of a plan to cure "the pandemic of misinformati

sciencebasedmedicine.org

As i said before these people will not listen. they are right, the Vaccine is the devil and will kill all 5 billion people that have taken it and nothing will convince them otherwise. Its a strange phenomenon.

 

[mxett]

m

Myocarditis is a serious heart condition causing permanent scarring of the heart . It is not mild in the normal use of mild, because heart damage occurs as shown by MRI months after a 'mild' diagnosis. All diagnosed myocarditis, whether mild or not was included in the research of deaths after myocarditis over the last 30 years.

It was suggested that the more serious or the younger the person is when diagnosed, the worse the prognosis.

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic's observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%.

Myocarditis

Depending on the cause and extent of myocardial damage, the mortality rate is up to 20% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years. Despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in the last 30 years.

Viral Myocarditis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

The FDA identified unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis after mRNA jabs and ordered Pfizer to conduct RCTs, and until they're finished and reported on,

"We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies: Numbered 4-9 to be completed between 2023 and 2027.

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:
10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.” First human trial to be completed in 2025.

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

myocarditis is simply inflammation. It is quite common after viral infection. Most times it is mild and leaves no impact. Cases which are chronic or severe lead to permanent damage and increased mortality

 

[mxett]

“In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”

Myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the incidence of myocarditis in COVID-19 vaccines and in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection groups.MethodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of...

www.frontiersin.org

Myocarditis is a serious heart condition causing permanent scarring of the heart . It is not mild in the normal use of mild, because heart damage occurs as shown by MRI months after a 'mild' diagnosis. All diagnosed myocarditis, whether mild or not was included in the research of deaths after myocarditis over the last 30 years.

It was suggested that the more serious or the younger the person is when diagnosed, the worse the prognosis.

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic's observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%.

Myocarditis

Depending on the cause and extent of myocardial damage, the mortality rate is up to 20% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years. Despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in the last 30 years.

Viral Myocarditis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

The FDA identified unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis after mRNA jabs and ordered Pfizer to conduct RCTs, and until they're finished and reported on,

"We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies: Numbered 4-9 to be completed between 2023 and 2027.

We acknowledge your written commitments as described in your letter of August 21, 2021 as outlined below:
10. Study C4591022, entitled “Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Exposure during Pregnancy: A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of Pregnancy and Infant Outcomes in the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS)/MotherToBaby Pregnancy Registry.” First human trial to be completed in 2025.

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

 

[BlueE]

myocarditis is simply inflammation. It is quite common after viral infection. Most times it is mild and leaves no impact. Cases which are chronic or severe lead to permanent damage and increased mortality

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic's observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%.

Myocarditis

 

[BlueE]

“In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”

Myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare the incidence of myocarditis in COVID-19 vaccines and in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection groups.MethodsElectronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of...

www.frontiersin.org

"We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.

Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA is not sufficient to assess these serious risks. Therefore, based on appropriate scientific data, we have determined that you are required to conduct the following studies:

4. Study C4591009, entitled “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.
We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: August 31, 2021
Monitoring Report Submission: October 31, 2022
Interim Report Submission: October 31, 2023
Study Completion: June 30, 2025
Final Report Submission: October 31, 2025

5. Study C4591021, entitled “Post Conditional Approval Active Surveillance Study Among Individuals in Europe Receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine,” to evaluate the occurrence of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY.
We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: August 11, 2021
Progress Report Submission: September 30, 2021
Interim Report 1 Submission: March 31, 2022
Interim Report 2 Submission: September 30, 2022
Interim Report 3 Submission: March 31, 2023
Interim Report 4 Submission: September 30, 2023
Interim Report 5 Submission: March 31, 2024
Study Completion: March 31, 2024
Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

6. Study C4591021 substudy to describe the natural history of myocarditis and pericarditis following administration of COMIRNATY. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: January 31, 2022
Study Completion: March 31, 2024
Final Report Submission: September 30, 2024

7. Study C4591036, a prospective cohort study with at least 5 years of follow-up for potential long-term sequelae of myocarditis after vaccination (in collaboration with Pediatric Heart Network). We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021
Study Completion: December 31, 2026
Final Report Submission: May 31, 2027

8. Study C4591007 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of the second dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of participants 5 through 15 years of age. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this assessment according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: September 30, 2021
Study Completion: November 30, 2023
Final Report Submission: May 31, 2024

9. Study C4591031 substudy to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of a third dose of COMIRNATY in a subset of participants 16 to 30 years of age. We acknowledge the timetable you submitted on August 21, 2021, which states that you will conduct this study according to the following schedule:
Final Protocol Submission: November 30, 2021
Study Completion: June 30, 2022
Final Report Submission: December 31, 2022

https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download

 

[BlueE]

He's completely wrong

The BHF Tipping Point report quoted by Dr Malhotra, From March 2020 through to August 2022, there have been just over 30,000 excess deaths involving ischaemic heart disease (IHD) - the most common type of heart disease - in England. This is 14% higher than we would have expected to see pre-pandemic. Additionally, there have been thousands more excess deaths involving other heart or circulatory conditions, such as heart failure or cerebrovascular disease (stroke).

Mortality involving cardiovascular diseases, continued to report higher than expected levels. Covid infection is no longer a driving force behind the excess CVD death rate. It is likely that external factors, such as sustained bottlenecks in access to and delivery of NHS services, are the main contributors to the number of extra heart and circulatory deaths we continue to sadly see.

A huge increase in waiting time for treatment of cardiovascular diseases is very poor and can partly explain the tens of thousands increase in excess deaths from IHD other circulatory and heart failure not due to COVID-19, as shown in the 'Office of Health Improvements and Disparities' and reported by both Campbell and the arm waving scientist. Campbell also provides official data on excess deaths not from COVID, from UK Office of National Statistics that does not please the arm waver.

It is multifactorial and willful blindness or ignorance to dismiss concerns experienced medical personal, cardiologists, scientists and researchers around the world are expressing.

There is no decrease in these excess deaths, which is misrepresented by the arm waving scientist you've linked.

Microsoft Power BI

app.powerbi.com

 

[BlueE]

 

[mxett]

The Myocarditis Treatment Trial reported mortality rates for biopsy-verified myocarditis of 20% and 56% at 1 year and 4.3 years, respectively. These outcomes are similar to the Mayo Clinic's observational data of 5-year survival rates that approximate 50%.

Myocarditis

this is for fulminant myocarditis. Vax induce myocarditis is not the same