Cross or Mitchel

[Bachar_Houli]

Whitch one would you take?

 

[Colin D'Cops]

They are both very similar players and good players, but I think I'd take Mitchell just ahead of Cross...

 

[anti.]

mitchell easily i reckon.

 

[Clanger]

Daniel Cross was injured for part of 2007. He'll be great value at next year's price.

 

[footy_4_life]

had both last year from the start until cross got injured..

cross seemed to be a little more consistant but both are very worthy...

 

[bloods01]

Cross anyday. Mitchell gets tagged, Cross doesn't. Cross gets alot of uncontested marks and has a high tackle count. Mitchell's a great player also but he has about 3 or 4 shockers a year. Cross on the other hand is ultra consistant.

 

[Virgil]

IIRC 3 of Mitchell's midfield teammates are suspended for Round One (Lewis, Hodge, Crawford). Mitchell will get a lot of attention. I would've thought, generally speaking, that Cross is the higher scorer anyway (not entirely sure, just a guess).

 

[BenCousins09]

Mitchell Easily...

Hodge won't smother Mitchell, Mitchell can find the ball on his own.
He did well last year with Hodge and Lewis and Sewell...

 

[Jolldo87]

Daniel Cross was injured for part of 2007. He'll be great value at next year's price.

 

[Pigdog]

Daniel Cross was injured for part of 2007. He'll be great value at next year's price.

And when he came back into the team he was severely undone and his scores reflected this.

I have him every year and he is a very consistent DT scorer.

 

[bloods01]

And when he came back into the team he was severely undone and his scores reflected this.

I have him every year and he is a very consistent DT scorer.

The fact that Boyd played ahead of him after his return also didn't help. His game time dropped to about 75%. There's no doubt that he will be starting in the centre sqaure alongside Westy and Cooney come Round 1.

 

[Pigdog]

The fact that Boyd played ahead of him after his return also didn't help. His game time dropped to about 75%. There's no doubt that he will be starting in the centre sqaure alongside Westy and Cooney come Round 1.

The reason for that was because he wasn't match fit. The 6 or 8 week lay off meant when he came back he was lacking match fitness which is super important for a player like Cross.

Agree he will be an important player for the Dogs next season.

 

[lifelike_]

Cross if you want consistency and a higher average.

Mitchell if you want semi-regular big scores.

 

[Juddtastic]

It's all about Daniel Cross.... I'm tipping an average over the 100 mark next season, will be a great buy

 

[Gippy]

Mitchell owns all

 

[deledio_gun]

Will Cross be better value in 08 due to him missing games....or didnt he miss enough for it to drop his price?

 

[Clanger]

Daniel Cross played 15 games last season. His value won't be cheaper because he missed some games but because his average was lower after he got injured.
Averaged 106 until round 10
72 after

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/players/year.php?firstname=Daniel&surname=Cross&year=2007

 

[hawka_fan]

Hawks supporter - I still take cross, gun

Only in DT though, in real life Mitchell craps all over cross