Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Rankine handed a 4 match suspension by the AFL integrity unit for a homophobic slur against opponent

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Jon Ralph reporting Adelaide bracing for 3-5 week suspension.
Jon Ralph the little league lickspittle floating this BS to soften the fallout when the league bottle it and offer 3 weeks so he can 'play in the grand final'.

If the AFL deliver a 3 week penalty (if he's guilty), it would be more offensive to the demographic they purport to be protecting than the offense itself.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Mate there’s some that want to take it through the courts enough said there

Luckily it’s a minority and many have told them to pull their head in

I havent commented in that thread because its just bizarre - my thoughts are above

Its frustrating because if it was an oppo player all boots would be in kicking and stomping

I try and tell our board to imagine if the boot is on the other foot what their thoughts would be

But like ALL TEAM boards there is this retreat to protecting ''our '' player with no thought to what they have done
 
Rumour is he called Quaynor a ****** multiple times.. who knows how true
It’s that’s true and he has said it repeatedly during the game, this probably needs to be a bigger suspension than Graham got.

Can’t argue it was a stupid, heat of the moment mistake if it was being said repeatedly.
 
You would be pretty pissed off if you were a teammate of Rankine. Not only is he likely to miss but just an unwanted distraction via the media. You can almost see it in the faces of Fogarty and Dawson. A genuine chance this year and now this so close to the finish line.
 
My original thoughts.

Not sure how they can escape handing down a 4 week penalty given the similaritites to Graham.

Could still make the GF if Adelaide drop the QF and go the long way.
Graham self reported and only made the comment once (AFAIK).

Means it has to be a minimum 5. You could reasonably argue it should be 6. Tack on a week each for it being repetitive and also because it was a targeted attack on how a player dresses/decorates their body (fingernails painted).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Graham self reported and only made the comment once (AFAIK).

Means it has to be a minimum 5. You could reasonably argue it should be 6. Tack on a week each for it being repetitive and also because it was a targeted attack on how a player dresses/decorates their body (fingernails painted).
It appears Adelaide self reported.
 
ANything less than 5 is a complete waste of time, and clear that theyd rather protect Adelaide's premiership hopes than really making a statment.

I’d be okay with 4, but it should be 5.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I’d be okay with 4, but it should be 5.

I'd be okay with 4 too but 5 makes a real statement, not that it would have any difference to Rankine whether he got 4 or 5 at this stage.

Although they could always lose the first game of the qualifying final, which means 5 weeks means he's definitely out for the whole final series.
 
I don't think the AFL can sweep this under the carpet. But I wouldn't be surprised to hear that it's a complex investigation that will take considerable time, and in the interests of both clubs who are playing finals and can't be distracted, the investigation will be postponed until the end of the season for procedural fairness
Geewizz. That's sounds like a definite possibility now you mention it. How far have we fallen.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NO TROLLS Rankine handed a 4 match suspension by the AFL integrity unit for a homophobic slur against opponent

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top