- Oct 31, 2016
- 3,699
- 2,722
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- qpr
The "reason" for a shorter suspension that cant be talked about hasn't applied for this type of discretion.watch him only get 2 weeks
Joke of a league
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The "reason" for a shorter suspension that cant be talked about hasn't applied for this type of discretion.watch him only get 2 weeks
Joke of a league
Collingwood supporters shouldn't be calling the afl out on shenanigans.They'll twist it dont worry. He wont be missing a GF.
Is The Age credible to you?Do you have a credible source for this info?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That’ll teach Rankine to call someone a pile of sticks
so you're assuming that you'll win a home prelim against anyone?Tank to have an away prelim without rankine instead of a GF without him?
I don't like that all these tribunal decisions in general are resulting in more and more suspensions. Its just expanding their power to influence the game as a result of what one player does. Then you have umpires getting more and more involved in decisions.Personally I think it is strange that we are suspending players for using words. By all means, they should be called out on it and put into some sort of re-education but don’t think suspending is the answer. Especially in a time when you can punch someone in the back / gut but not get suspended because it didn’t warrant enough force.
Adelaide dropped down the ladder, got a higher pick and got Curtin as a result.I reckon the AFL might repay the Crows for the goal umpiring disaster a couple of years ago with this one.
Time to call in that favour Nicksy...
![]()
That's Nicks on the left. And the AFL on the right. In case you didn't work it out.
This one does. Throw the book at him.Do gay people even really care or want Rankine suspended?
Short odds to be swept under the carpet.
Precedent says 4 weeks if Rankine owned up to it himself, 5+ if he didn’t.
So will likely land on 2 weeks and an “education course” because it’s a star in finals, as opposed to Graham/Finlayson/Powell/Collard.
Is The Age credible to you?
Do gay people even really care or want Rankine suspended? Or is this another example of a small group of elites at AFL house choosing to be offended on behalf of another group to virtue signal how evolved and superior they are.
Not quite.the bar is set at 3-4 weeks for a homophobic slur isn't it?
Jeremy Finlayson got 3 weeks
Jack Graham got 4 weeks
Rankine is a ****in dumbass for putting himself in this position, especially when the cows are going so well.
Personally I think it is strange that we are suspending players for using words. By all means, they should be called out on it and put into some sort of re-education but don’t think suspending is the answer. Especially in a time when you can punch someone in the back / gut but not get suspended because it didn’t warrant enough force.
Ridiculous comment.And that is why there is so much interest in this.... Missing the gf and him being indigenous is like a double reason for the AFL to make up a bullshit excuse.
I would hazard a guess that if he was non indigenous, he definitely misses the grand final. Because of his skin colour, he has a chance!!!
And most of these ex afl player all used racial and gay slurs on and off the field .But the AFL media circus love it. They're salivating over this Rankine thing, probably brings in a lot of the non AFL brigade for various reasons.
Not quite.
Powell-5 weeks
St kilda player in the vfl 6 weeks.
With the AFL saying they will continue to increase the penalty
The 4 weeks for Graham was due to him self reporting.
If Izak did the same as has been reported 4 must be the minimum.
So what you are saying is if Rankine has issued an apology (meaning he has admitted to his actions), he should do an abrupt u-turn and deny any such claim?
Correct me if you think I am wrong, but I would say trying this daring tactic with the flip flopping wouldn't exactly make him come up smelling like roses on the the other side.
Double ups against Gold Coast, Collingwood and Hawthorn, plus your mob who was supposed to be decent this year.They’ve already called in the favour with the draw they had this year and last. Plus that ridiculous crows favoured umpiring on Saturday night gets them the win and top 2. Makes up for the goal miss and missing the 8 in 2023.
It absolutely does given Rioli’s punishment (or lack of).Rankine being Aboriginal has nothing to do with this.
I think he's trying to tell you we got an easy draw because we were fixtured to play the powers twiceYou do know our 3 out of 6 double up games this year are not only against the top 8 but sides fighting for the top 4????