- Jun 3, 2014
- 8,794
- 11,295
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- QLDer
The reality is, what the reality is.Damian Hardwick is that you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The reality is, what the reality is.Damian Hardwick is that you?
I’d love to believe this, but don’t.Supposedly, Rankine wasn't aware the Collingwood player had concern with what he said? It wasn't direct at the player but at his previous contest at the ball.
I completely reject homophobia. It has no place in society and must be eradicated. However, the AFL’s long suspensions for homophobic slurs demonstrate inflexibility and rely on the wrong disciplinary tool. These slurs are often used casually in Aussie culture as reflex insults meaning “soft” or “weak,” not literal attacks (doesn't make it okay).
This heavy handed approach is not in line with punishments for other on or off field offences. Poor respect for sexuality, typically expressed through off the cuff remarks, shouldn’t threaten players’ right to play. Education is paramount, both within clubs and in the public sphere. Financial penalties and comprehensive mandatory education programs would be far more effective than suspensions alone.
Despite efforts since 2014 acknowledging that real change requires education and cultural shifts (not just bans) this approach has now reared its ugly head at a crucial time. A more creative, balanced strategy combining consequences with education and awareness campaigns is urgently needed for long term progress. Precedent suggests Rankine should cop a 5 week ban, but the AFL needs to rethink this moving forward.
Fair? Powell used the same word once during the game. Immediately reported himself on the Suns bench and apologised to Lions player after the game. Powell got 5 weeks.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I am trying to understand what you mean by this:What? I said it was after the game the Collingwood players were talking about it.
These slurs are often used casually in Aussie culture as reflex insults meaning “soft” or “weak,” not literal attacks (doesn't make it okay).
I'm sure the gay community would love to have Rankine join them on some projects, don't assume other groups are as closed off and angry
The AFL does a lot of education about it. Within the walls of clubs as well as externally (e.g. pride round).
Not pointing the finger at you directly but I have seen quite a few people here say that the AFL should focus more on education. I really, really hope some of those people aren’t the same people who end up complaining about Pride Round and say that the “woke” AFL should stay out of political and social issues.
So who actually dobbed him in? Did an umpire hear it or did a player report it?Yeah, I heard that too. So I guess his crime would be self-homophobic-vilification directed towards his own actions slurring himself. It wouldn't appease the Gerard Whatley types though as the mere utterance of the word is something he hasn't heard in twenty years and a crime against humanity.
Probably not Maynard either, the likely offended party.
![]()
Pies star says AFL must 'stamp out' homophobic slurs amid Rankine probe
Collingwood vice-captain Brayden Maynard says homophobic slurs have "happened too often" as the league investigates an alleged remark made by Izak Rankine against the Magpies.www.abc.net.au
Collingwood alerted Adel, who then went to the AFL.
Rankine didn't alert Adel first.
Thought he didn't go hard enough at the ball so called himself a you know what.He didn't direct it at the player but at the player's contest describing it as the F word.
Exactly I wish people will learn the meaning of SELF…it doesn’t mean be the last person to own up!
I would have thought that considering the Crows best player of the 21st century is an openly proud member of the LGBTIQA+ community that their would be at least some awareness and education amongst the playing group.
Yeah, unless they consider Jack Nicholson’s character in A Few Good Men trapping himself into a confession to be a “self report”.
Now that's some spin. "Your contest there was weak as a f.......". Either way it's same stuff.What? He already apologies to the Collingwood player as he wasn't aware the Collingwood player was bothered with what he said and he wasn't until a Collingwood official overheard it after the game. He didn't direct it at the player but at the player's contest describing it as the F word.
On 360 tonight, Whately didn't mention individuals players but rather at the club level from Collingwood to Adelaide and then Adelaide to the AFL.So who actually dobbed him in? Did an umpire hear it or did a player report it?
I don't think anyone is arguing it's not wrong but the punishment is wrong .The only thing giving this oxygen is the people that want to argue that it either wasn't offensive, that he shouldn't be suspended, that people should be allowed to use the slurs they want etc etc.
The day that this happens again, and everyone just says "yep that's wrong, he should be sanctioned" will be a relief. Why's that so hard?
I've only responded in this thread to people arguing otherwise. If they just accepted it, which they should, talking about whingeing over nothing, then we will be a lot closer to putting an end to this crap.
What's even the argument here? People want to fight to use the slurs they desire? Or is that they don't actually don't want the game available to people different from them?
We shouldn't have to argue about the offensiveness of any of these types of things anymore. If he said the wrong thing, everyone should just accept it. The constant arguments against makes me suspect that people have stronger motives than simply being so concerned about whether people are offended or not.
Pretty sure there is only a pride game, not a full AFLM Pride Round (correct me if I’m wrong). For me a Pride Round is as important as Sir Doug Nicholls and multicultural rounds. Around 4.5 percent of Australians aged 16 and over - 900,000+ people - identify as LGBTQIA+ with nearly 10 percent of young people aged 16 to 24 identifying as such. Given this significant community and the AFL’s growing global reach this should be no-brainer.The AFL does a lot of education about it. Within the walls of clubs as well as externally (e.g. pride round).
Not pointing the finger at you directly but I have seen quite a few people here say that the AFL should focus more on education. I really, really hope some of those people aren’t the same people who end up complaining about Pride Round and say that the “woke” AFL should stay out of political and social issues.
What exactly is the "players contest".
How loud did he call this "contest" a ****** that Collingwood officials heard it lmao
You just don't get it, do you?A gay staffed charity that does work benefitting their community would be my guess
Afl doesn't care about anything but money...and being seen to be PC keeps the money coming inI don't think anyone is arguing it's not wrong but the punishment is wrong .
You have people getting no suspension for death threats
People getting less weeks for punching someone
The afl having snoop dog as their pre game show when he is a known misogynist, criminal and has engaged in gay slurs online to actual gay people .
They also endorse gambling in sports betting and pokies which destroys people's lives .
It's the moral double standards that people aren't happy with
I wish you were right.I don't think anyone is arguing it's not wrong but the punishment is wrong .
You have people getting no suspension for death threats
People getting less weeks for punching someone
The afl having snoop dog as their pre game show when he is a known misogynist, criminal and has engaged in gay slurs online to actual gay people .
They also endorse gambling in sports betting and pokies which destroys people's lives .
It's the moral double standards that people aren't happy with
Pretty sure there is only a pride game, not a full AFLM Pride Round (correct me if I’m wrong).