Agree players need to put in the training, however there are contradictions in the Crows actions:
1) The club knew he would concentrate on his studies in 2008
2) The Club put together a training regime whilst Danger was studying, which was going to be monitored by the club. If Danger isn't fit they should take some of the blame as they were suppose to monitor him.
3) The club plays him against the Dons and Saints in rounds 20 & 21 2008. If he wasn't at the fittness levels the club requires in Dec 08 /Jan 09 as Neil says how on earth could he have been fit for the games against the Dons and Saints.
4) And if he wasn't fit (excluding injury) for the game against the Cats why was he played in the IAS game.
So if we agree that players need to put in the training then Danger should not have played a game last year or this year based on what Neil is saying.
1) Draft picks are based on their potential output over their careers, and more specifically, their output during their peak, typically age 22-30 - No need to care about 2008, if he'll be ready to peak. Plus, Danger is quite under-aged, in fact he would be ineligible to be drafted at the same age this year, so we didn't really lose much by having him interstate.
2) Monitor all you want, a player has to make the decision to follow through on a training regime done in their own time. Admittedly, it would be hard to expect an kid doing year 12 in another state from the club to really show the dedication needed to get up to speed. If he wanted to be ready, he would have had to have shown extra self-discipline, but he didn't and he wasn't ready.
3) His 2 games last year was a last minute experiment to see if Danger could possibly cover for the loss of both Porps and Burton during September. They also brought Otten back prematurely after a very quiet first game against Hawthorn (admittedly a tough game, and little TOG). They experimented, it didn't quite work, but you have to take risks in that scenario with little options in September. It was a pragmatic decision in an non-ideal setting.
4) The IAS game had squads of 30 players, as opposed to the 26 used in the NAB Cup games.




