I understand why the cats are like this. They had a free agent who was restricted once, called Gary Ablett Junior, they quite liked him and he marched without much to and/or fro, so they think that's how all RFA's work.I've been unusually impressed with the restraint of our posters, actually (none more than you, in fact). Almost everyone here has recognised that we'll almost certainly get well below value for Dangerfield and are making contributions and suggestions based around this logical assumption, instead of the "PICK 1 AND 2 OR PSD" nonsense we often see on this board. It's like we're already meeting them half way, with suggestions like Pick 9 and Cockatoo or whatever.
This is why some of the posts by Geelong fans on here have been annoying. We've got just as many clowns as them, but there seems to be a very poor understanding of the 'restricted' part of RFA on one side of debate. It's tough to lose your best player. To then have a very large number of posters basically suggesting we should be happy with the compo pick, and are acting outside the 'spirit of free agency' for wanting to match to negotiate a better deal for a player who is clearly worth significantly more than this, is a little tedious.
I know it doesn't mean much coming from me - a guy who threw out a pretty solid rant last night - but that's how I see it.
The complicating factor in this one is that it's somebody leaving for probably less money (rather than more) so the home club is definitely going to be able to match the offer, which throws a spanner in the FA works.


