- Joined
- Oct 2, 2008
- Posts
- 9,209
- Reaction score
- 19,687
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Brothers of Destruction
Just heard on Bartlett's radio show that Richmond is his preferred option, it's looking really good boys and girls!! 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
FA Cup Semi-Finals ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ Europa - Rd of 16 ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - KNOCKOUTS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ Champs League - League Phase ⚽
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 5
SuperCoach Rd 5 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 5 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I gotta respect the the guy for at least one thing. The guy has principles!!!
I remember Frawley on the TV said Craig had to drop him off before his Port appointment as coaches mentor or whatever after Craig left the Crows cause he was getting too close to the Port home base to stomach.
Classic, gotta love that!!!!!
I think if Craigs main focus is development particularly in the physical/fitness development etc.. area he would be of great benefit. Particularly individual footy development
Without being harsh, if he is ring fenced away from recruitment, match day team selection, and match day strategy it should work
Very true. I think he will have a general role over-seeing many things, particularly, fitness/physical development but also be able to assist on match day as well. Think this is a better appointment that just getting an ex-head coach to be head assistant. That would be treading on toes.
Doubt he will have any say in recruitment or any of the other stuff though he may help out on match day.
Could potentially be the big fish we were after![]()
Seriously though, he could be our best recruit of the season.
The thing that worries me is the apparent(perceived clash) issues with Walker etc.. If this type of influence (wouldn't have a clue what the problem was with certain players)can be separated from on field performance(eg. relative to the context of the goal is premiership winning team creation)
regarding appraisal he would be of definite benefit
Yes, I have no issue with a coach expecting his forward to apply defensive pressure.
I wonder if our interest in Craig is linked to the recent ties we made with Athletes' Performance overseas. Sounds like the kinda thing he would really go for.
I wonder if our interest in Craig is linked to the recent ties we made with Athletes' Performance overseas. Sounds like the kinda thing he would really go for.
...the fact that you and plenty of others have been abusing me all year for being right?
.
I wonder if our interest in Craig is linked to the recent ties we made with Athletes' Performance overseas. Sounds like the kinda thing he would really go for.

The bottom line is the maintenance of the ultimate goal of the development of a premiership team generally along a loosely defined realistic measured credible project time frame. As long as any other potential behavioural inclinations do not get in the way of this goal eg. no room for dysfunction from the ultimate goal, there should not be a problem
The other issue was the his apparent(based on media representations) lack of recognition of the deficiencies of where the crows list was at regarding certain components. This can happen to anyone particularly when they get too close so what is important is the development methods evaluations and assessments utilised are objective as much as possible with credible benchmarks and tools with appropriate track records to draw integrity and confidence from including utilising consultation and alternative validation techniques!!

Best jargon outburst I've read on here, but have NFI what this means
![]()
The bottom line is the maintenance of the ultimate goal of the development of a premiership team generally along a loosely defined realistic measured credible project time frame. As long as any other potential behavioural inclinations do not get in the way of this goal eg. no room for dysfunction from the ultimate goal, there should not be a problem
The other issue was the his apparent(based on media representations) lack of recognition of the deficiencies of where the crows list was at regarding certain components. This can happen to anyone particularly when they get too close so what is important is the development methods evaluations and assessments utilised are objective as much as possible with credible benchmarks and tools with appropriate track records to draw integrity and confidence from including utilising consultation and alternative validation techniques!!

...
The bottom line is the maintenance of the ultimate goal of the development of a premiership team generally along a loosely defined realistic measured credible project time frame. As long as any other potential behavioural inclinations do not get in the way of this goal eg. no room for dysfunction from the ultimate goal, there should not be a problem
The other issue was the his apparent(based on media representations) lack of recognition of the deficiencies of where the crows list was at regarding certain components. This can happen to anyone particularly when they get too close so what is important is the development methods evaluations and assessments utilised are objective as much as possible with credible benchmarks and tools with appropriate track records to draw integrity and confidence from including utilising consultation and alternative validation techniques!!

The bottom line is the maintenance of the ultimate goal of the development of a premiership team generally along a loosely defined realistic measured credible project time frame. As long as any other potential behavioural inclinations do not get in the way of this goal eg. no room for dysfunction from the ultimate goal, there should not be a problem
The other issue was the his apparent(based on media representations) lack of recognition of the deficiencies of where the crows list was at regarding certain components. This can happen to anyone particularly when they get too close so what is important is the development methods evaluations and assessments utilised are objective as much as possible with credible benchmarks and tools with appropriate track records to draw integrity and confidence from including utilising consultation and alternative validation techniques!!
