Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
blues4flag said:Our forward line wasn't too good today,
NorthBhoy said:Meh. We were ok. Sooo many blokes down though. Grant, Harvey, Simpson, Harris and Wells were not great. Midfield still won though. Funny that......
Our Lance is better than yours, and ours is rubbish!!!
Wojee said:I'm disappointed because I honestly feel it's a game we should have won.
As an aside I find it odd that the papers are saying Fev was rendered ineffective by Brown yet are gushing about Sav Rocca who only kicked one more goal than him while playing on a makeshift full-back for much of the game.
Wojee said:I'm disappointed because I honestly feel it's a game we should have won.
As an aside I find it odd that the papers are saying Fev was rendered ineffective by Brown yet are gushing about Sav Rocca who only kicked one more goal than him while playing on a makeshift full-back for much of the game.
Petrie Dish said:You really didn't see the difference?
Fevola kicked a goal five minutes in, a goal after sitting on the back of the pack after Brown dropped a mark, and a goal after the siren. He was nowhere to be found when the game was there to be won in the middle two quarters.
Rocca kicked four, set up a couple of others, and presented all day. He was consistently in front of his man and providing a target, and even missed a couple of shots he should have kicked.
Fevola was very lucky to walk away with three goals, while Rocca probably deserved more than the four he kicked.
For everyone saying we just caught the Blues on a bad day, do you think we played well? Very scrappy, low quality game of football highlighted by some brilliance from Betts and Wells. Both sides can play a lot better.
Jeez you Carlton fans are harsh ey? Both clubs played poorly and talking about floods? Haha, some of the times there wasnt a player in your half. Simpson, Grant, Harvey, Harris all played below par and we still won. Carlton are on the rise, but stop making excuses.next_afl_player said:hmmm...considering the kangas were flooding the carlton forward line basically all day, and Whitnal, Fevola, Stevens, Campo and Houlihan hardly had an affect and the kangas only won by 20points....PRETTY CONVINCING WIN TO THE KANGAS![]()
RoK said:Time for some facts pal,we played crap you didn't win we lossed it on our own,we will finsh much higher than your bottom 4 team,the sun shone on your dogs arse of a club thats all.
Go broke and go away poor arse club.
bReEe20 said:Its really funny how you have to resort to petty insults just because you cant accept the fact that you lost.
Nice and mature![]()
Funkalicous said:If Kangeroos plan to play 21 more games like that then they'll overtake Sydney as the most boring team in the AFL. Good on em though, they probably weren't gonna beat us any other way. A good experience for our youngsters though. Hopefully in the future we'll learn how to win ugly.
AndSmithMustScore said:Seemed of the 40000 crowd there may have only been 12-15000 kangas fans there.
AndSmithMustScore said:Seemed of the 40000 crowd there may have only been 12-15000 kangas fans there.
.