Ah, well I retract, but I'm sure that was his stated position at one time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure that was his stated position at one time.
I've only ever been to one of these multi-franchise mega conventions and didn't really enjoy it that much. That said I do perk up when a Who alumnus comes to one. The prices you're quoting don't seem excessive for modern standards but I couldn't possibly justify spending that amount on a two-second scribble. I'm not going to think less of him for trying to make a living though, or for taking advantage of his standing in the fan community. Good luck to him.
Does anyone think we'd be likely to hear anything all that interesting from his appearance/interview? As much as I think he's a great actor, I think he's already said everything he's likely to say publicly about his short stint on the show.
Can't recall him ever saying it, but he did claim in 2018 that the BBC had 'put him on a blacklist' after Doctor Who.
I want to hear what he really thinks about Johnny 'get my junk out' Barrowman, even before the flashing scandal came out last year (which i had known about for years btw) a big reason Eccleston quit was because of Barrowman's lewd and unprofessional behaviour apparently (according to multiple sources over the years)
Cannot believe there are fans out there who still defend JB and want him back in the show.
Going by his social media posts, he is a narracist who thinks he did nothing wrong.
Think most people knew about it for years, it didn't 'come out' last year.
Cannot believe there are fans out there who still defend JB and want him back in the show.
I'd like him back in the show. Having seen at a convention he's just as seen on any of his social media, a great narcissistic showman.I want to hear what he really thinks about Johnny 'get my junk out' Barrowman, even before the flashing scandal came out last year (which i had known about for years btw) a big reason Eccleston quit was because of Barrowman's lewd and unprofessional behaviour apparently (according to multiple sources over the years)
Cannot believe there are fans out there who still defend JB and want him back in the show.
Going by his social media posts, he is a narracist who thinks he did nothing wrong.
190 dollars for an Autograph
200 dollars for a photo with him
Yeah hard pass from me.
Well he was back in the show fairly recently.
And there were a lot of Aussie fans happy to see him when he appeared at Melbourne Comic-con a year or so back. I see he's a 'virtual' panel guest at Oz Comic-cons this year too.
Perhaps plenty don't see it as a big deal in the scheme of things.
Whilst I don’t think you’re off the mark, I do think that elements of season 22 are underrated. There are some good stories in this lot. Here’s my summation;Deadly serious.
Season 22 is vastly underrated at any rate.
Currently going through S17 the collection and its a massive chore. Creature from The Pit is absolutely woeful.
Yet because it's from a season where Douglas Adams was script editor, elitists in fandom somehow think that season is a work of genius.
And Attack of the Cybermen is the best 80s Cybermen story, and best one since The Invasion.
Despite the obvious flaws I've also always quite liked season 22. Can't stand Trial/23 though.Deadly serious.
Season 22 is vastly underrated at any rate.
Currently going through S17 the collection and its a massive chore. Creature from The Pit is absolutely woeful.
Yet because it's from a season where Douglas Adams was script editor, elitists in fandom somehow think that season is a work of genius.
And Attack of the Cybermen is the best 80s Cybermen story, and best one since The Invasion.
I like the fact S22 went with 40 minute episodes, meant the pacing was much better.
Having watched the Eccleston and Tenant seasons of new Who, I can’t understand the hype around Tennant at all. I am genuinely surprised he is ranked so highly. It must be new fans seeing him as the one they like, but I just don’t like the way he portrays it. Both Eccleston and Tennant play it predominantly to Rose as this big brother type of character, an excitable and almost star struck character that resembles a sense of naïvety and humanity which is just not alien or emotionally removed from the situation and companion. They seem to display envy far too frequently and there is this obvious sexual tension between them.
I am not sure what they were going for, but I feel this has missed the mark and whilst there are some great stories (Dalek, tooth and claw) the portrayal of the doctor is just not very alien. They’ve also messed up unforgivably with the daleks. Initially it was Dalek where it was supposed to be the last one. That whole notion and concept was then thrown out the window in the last two stories of the ninth doctor’s tenure. It’s all become a convoluted mess of ‘how can we fit the daleks into it again?’
Unfortunately this is nothing like classic who and it’s an altogether different and new show that lacks the seriousness, threat, and proper personality traits of the leading man.
Agree. You’ve literally got two ends of the spectrum over two stories. The Caves of Androzani is frequently listed in the top echelon of stories, and the twin dilemma sits at the bottom of the heap, frequenting the position of worst or close to the worst when you ask for opinions.It was a precursor to modern genrr/sci-fi TV is these days in many respects. Also at the time a decent budget stretcher.
Unfortunately i feel like Sixie's/Colin's fate was doomed when Eric Saward and JN-T thought it was a good idea for The Doctor to strangle his new companion 6-7 minutes into his first episode (The Twin Dilemma part 1)
I think I can only compare Tennant and Ecclestone to Davison. I think they tried to portray them with the same youthful image that Davison had, but it falls flat because Davison could pull it together and be very serious and commanding when required without trying too hard.Yeah a re-watch has seen me re-rank Tennant much lower than at the time. Clara as a companion is also very patchy with her first season with Capaldi absolutely awful (I'm talking her character, not the season). Interesting what re-watches can do to perspective! I think S10 on rewatch is just about the best season of New Who, behind only S4.
I think I can only compare Tennant and Ecclestone to Davison. I think they tried to portray them with the same youthful image that Davison had, but it falls flat because Davison could pull it together and be very serious and commanding when required without trying too hard.
I probably am. I think there are certain mannerisms that annoy but they are both definitely watchable. It’s probably the stories that frustrate me I think.I think Tennant and Eccleston both do that quite well when required too, think you're selling them a bit short.
I probably am. I think there are certain mannerisms that annoy but they are both definitely watchable. It’s probably the stories that frustrate me I think.
I probably am. I think there are certain mannerisms that annoy but they are both definitely watchable. It’s probably the stories that frustrate me I think.
Matt Smith seems to have had the more successful post Who Career since Eccleston and Tennant (case in point the Morbius movie and the new GOT prequel series)
I look at it this way, Eccleston's was too alien and Alpha, Tennant's too Sissy, Matt Smith's Doctor combined the best and worst of all Nu-Doctor's qualities with his own unique alien mannerisms and charm
Yeah doesn't bode well for the new season given I found RTD's seasons on the whole to be quite weak.
FFS, I feel so annoyed when I agree with you totally Smudger, the RTD seasons (and I like the bloke personally) the stories and episodes overall are unstructured crap (the whole Rose Tyler/Bad Wolf plot strand was next explained to me satisfactionally.