threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
We defended okay but we "only" won by 73 points (I say only) on xScore with us being +4 points and them -19 points (they still had 15 shots on goal, even if it was a below-average 3.2 expected points per shot).4.8 from 42 inside 50s. Think we defended ok. Wasn’t much to defend against. Let’s see how we go against Amiss, Voss and Treacy with the footy coming in from Young, Serong and Brayshaw.
The pre-game betting line was about 71 or 72 points. Bookmakers know to adjust for motivational factors late in season when clearly one team has nothing to play for when away, and while West Coast came out with a bit of intensity to start the match and start the 2nd half, they clearly were going through the motions more than if it was a R1 or R2 game or whatever.
Only 10 matches in 10 years have had a bigger bookie odds pre-game margin.
I'm not saying we played badly or anything, and if we were a statistical top 2-3 team or whatever that all of the stats model power rankings have us as, we didn't drop anything. But at the same time I'm not sure we can think of the team to be any better than what we thought before the game. Some players played well. Some players played poorly in the context of an easy an opposition and as any expectation of a big win as any team might have been.




