Remove this Banner Ad

Live Event Dougal Howard Hoedown - Aints v Poort - Click here for a f’ed up Merged Thread!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Thanks jaz
**** off the rest of yas
How hard is it to realise that a mullet is a good player?
Smith is kinda good.
But he ain’t Sam Walsh, never,,,,,..
Lol
We bagged the greatest....tears now.
Foot es cray.
Premiership Sam
EAD Mofra
We have him covered.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Dogs didn’t even win the free kick count you weak campaigner.
How was that mark at the end by Bont btw. Captains move. A huge difference from what the seagull Billings dishes up on a regular basis.

Plugger since 2016

1 Cup, 26 spoons

tenor2.gif
 
Thanks jaz
fu** off the rest of yas
How hard is it to realise that a mullet is a good player?
Smith is kinda good.
But he ain’t Sam Walsh, never,,,,,..
Lol
We bagged the greatest....tears now.
Foot es cray.
Premiership Sam
EAD Mofra
We have him covered.
Smith is far better than Walsh, nice melt
 
Dogs didn’t even win the free kick count you weak campaigner.
How was that mark at the end by Bont btw. Captains move. A huge difference from what the seagull Billings dishes up on a regular basis.

Is that the same Billings who was BOG with 24 touches and 3 goals when we beat the Bulldogs in Round 2? One of those goals was from a Bont goal assist lol.
 
Is that the same Billings who was BOG with 24 touches and 3 goals when we beat the Bulldogs in Round 2? One of those goals was from a Bont goal assist lol.
The same Billings that was awarded 39 free kicks for before he gave one away.
 
The same Billings that was awarded 39 free kicks for before he gave one away.

I doubt many, if any, of your players have a negative free kick differential considering the Bulldogs hardly ever lose a free kick count.
 
I doubt many, if any, of your players have a negative free kick differential considering the Bulldogs hardly ever lose a free kick count.
We did last night, which is surprising because you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.
 
I doubt many, if any, of your players have a negative free kick differential considering the Bulldogs hardly ever lose a free kick count.
The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.

But that was all probably too logical for you to follow so I'll let you get back to melting about umpires.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.

But that was all probably too logical for you to follow so I'll let you get back to melting about umpires.

The Bulldogs aren't better at not breaking the rules as often other teams, they are better at ducking, diving and milking free kicks more often than other teams.
 
We did last night, which is surprising because you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.

According to my stats the free kick count was even but I guess that is equivalent to losing the free kick count by the Bulldogs standards.
 
The Bulldogs aren't better at not breaking the rules as often other teams, they are better at ducking, diving and milking free kicks more often than other teams.
As I said, your fundamental premise is flawed - it is the opposition who break the rules and get penalised which causes us to get a free kick. Very simple, yet clearly too logical for you to grasp.
 
Famc5JB.gif
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.

But that was all probably too logical for you to follow so I'll let you get back to melting about umpires.
Yes, but the fundamental flaw in this argument is that umpires don't pay every free kick that's there, they let plenty go. So, as soon as you let some go, by definition that means you choose which ones to pay. How can it be fair umpiring if you come off saying "I let all but 25 Richmond infringements go, but all but nine of Collingwood's"?

As for not breaking the rules, try counting how many times your mob throws the ball. Start with the 2016 grand final - you'll find it's more than the Swans got frees of any type.
 
The Tiges are slowing waking up and wiping the sleep from their eyes, God w***ers Suck really are shit at footy, an embarrassment to the game and their coach has no ****ing idea what he’s doing.
I think the Tiges will eventually kick away in the last after not being very interested at all.
I look forward to Dusty having a word with their Cocaine snorting Ruckman.
Anyone got his per chance?

Anyhoo, would someone like to play the really drunk, stoned, offensive, fall all over the place and fall asleep under the coffee table at Christmas time uncle for me, I’m taking the night off, PM if your interested?
Enjoy the game floggos......
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Live Event Dougal Howard Hoedown - Aints v Poort - Click here for a f’ed up Merged Thread!

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top