I love you campaigners.
Feels like whatever
CC
CC
CC
CC
Eat me
CC
Feels like whatever
CC
CC
CC
CC
Eat me
CC
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Certainly not a decent barber.Who was JJ calling?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Dogs didn’t even win the free kick count you weak campaigner.Moral victory for the Suns.
Smith is far better than Walsh, nice meltThanks jaz
fu** off the rest of yas
How hard is it to realise that a mullet is a good player?
Smith is kinda good.
But he ain’t Sam Walsh, never,,,,,..
Lol
We bagged the greatest....tears now.
Foot es cray.
Premiership Sam
EAD Mofra
We have him covered.
Think he knows it, which is why there are so many of his posts about Bailey Smith.Smith is far better than Walsh, nice melt
Dogs didn’t even win the free kick count you weak campaigner.
How was that mark at the end by Bont btw. Captains move. A huge difference from what the seagull Billings dishes up on a regular basis.
The same Billings that was awarded 39 free kicks for before he gave one away.Is that the same Billings who was BOG with 24 touches and 3 goals when we beat the Bulldogs in Round 2? One of those goals was from a Bont goal assist lol.
The same Billings that was awarded 39 free kicks for before he gave one away.
We did last night, which is surprising because you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.I doubt many, if any, of your players have a negative free kick differential considering the Bulldogs hardly ever lose a free kick count.
The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.I doubt many, if any, of your players have a negative free kick differential considering the Bulldogs hardly ever lose a free kick count.
The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.
But that was all probably too logical for you to follow so I'll let you get back to melting about umpires.
We did last night, which is surprising because you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.
Nick RiewoldtThe Bulldogs aren't better at not breaking the rules as often other teams, they are better at ducking, diving and milking free kicks more often than other teams.
Nick Riewoldt
FF - 414
FA - 161
Nick Riewoldt of the St Kilda Saints Career AFL Stats
Nick Riewoldt of St Kilda Saints career AFL statisticswww.footywire.com
Dirty, disgusting cheat. You're right to denounce him.
As I said, your fundamental premise is flawed - it is the opposition who break the rules and get penalised which causes us to get a free kick. Very simple, yet clearly too logical for you to grasp.The Bulldogs aren't better at not breaking the rules as often other teams, they are better at ducking, diving and milking free kicks more often than other teams.
Horseshit.We did last night, which is surprising because you are a good team and are better than your opposition you will generally get more free kicks as you are usually first to the ball and making most of the play.
Yes, but the fundamental flaw in this argument is that umpires don't pay every free kick that's there, they let plenty go. So, as soon as you let some go, by definition that means you choose which ones to pay. How can it be fair umpiring if you come off saying "I let all but 25 Richmond infringements go, but all but nine of Collingwood's"?The fundamental flaw in basically every post you've ever made about umpires is that there is no law of the universe that says the free kick count should ever be even between two teams, because not all teams break the rules as often as others. Some, like the Bulldogs, are simply better at not breaking the rules as often as others.
But that was all probably too logical for you to follow so I'll let you get back to melting about umpires.
Is Plugger a Tiger supporter now?so up until this became a Rihcmunt v Bullflog sh*t fight it was a good thread. I hardly had to ban anyone