- Joined
- Jan 25, 2011
- Posts
- 9,155
- Reaction score
- 4,706
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Webber, Ricciardo, NE Patriots
But as far as I can tell vealesy isn't talking about driving whilst having drunk enough to impair your reflexes. He's talking about the ridiculous situation of the culpability of a driving incident increasing exponentially based on an arbitrary value which only provides an indication about an acceptable level of diminished driving ability.Yeah look clearly I'm talking about driving whilst having drunk enough to impair your reflexes and driving skills.
Not gonna bother with this thread anymore, it is pretty clear vealesy is either trolling hard or deluded. Gasometer last couple of posts, pretty much all that needs to be said about drink drivers.
Depending on a whole heap of other factors you could be .0499/.0500 and not impaired to the base level that is determined 'acceptable' or .0499/.0500 and impaired beyond that level.
Under the current system:
Not past the acceptable level at .0500=Much harsher penalties.
Past the acceptable level at .0499=Removal of the extra 'drink driving' penalties.
It is the same as many other situations in Victoria, arbitrary values make poor (albeit the best we have) measures of the legality of an action. However, strictly enforcing them (mandatory sentencing, introduced in Victoria in 2001), and not being able to take into account any mitigating circumstances is just idiotic.







