No, no and another big no.Anyone here think that having Co-Captains are any good? We could have Lloyd up in the foward line while having someone else in the midfield or backline.
Do you think that Fletch and Mal don't show leadership in the backline because they're not captains? Do you think Hirdy (can't bring myself to regard him as a former player just yet!) and Spike don't show leadership in the middle just because they're not captains?
As for the original question, Lloyd will and should be captain in 2008. From reports he's been instrumental in turning the club around off-field
Have just been reading Hirdys book - Reading The Play - and this is what he had to say on Lloydy's captaincy:
"Matthew Lloyd had been vice-captain for five seasons. He was ready, willing and able, liked and respected by the p[layers, a genuine superstar of the game and one of the most dedicated professionals I've ever met. Succession wasn't a problem, as Sheedy had often noted...
"He's brought a lot more discipline into the place, which is exactly what we needed with our young group. The captaincy has also brought Lloydy out of his shell, which is good....
"It's been said that it's difficult to captain from full forward, because you're usually too far away from the heat of the action to be able to give direction...I don't think it's a problem. The reality is that when you're not telling everyone what to do. There are leaders all over the place. I had strong back-up when I was captain - from Dean Wallis, Sean Wellman, Lloydy, Scotty Lucas and Darren Bewick."





