Essendon's Problem Doesn't Exist - Dank

[Bomberboy2013]

ASADA is the first authority, WADA can over rule and appeal if findings are not to their liking, ASADA only goes of what WADA says.

He said she said he did she did

For those who continue to make unsubstantiated claim, evidence ?

Again as quoted by lance, link ?

 

[hoianbulldog]

ASADA is the first authority, WADA can over rule and appeal if findings are not to their liking, ASADA only goes of what WADA says.

Look at it as puppa bear and baby bear

 

[Bomberboy2013]

Ok, I'll have a crack at this. ACC report in feb 2013. Says aod9604 not banned. Ever thought that the guy who wrote the ACC report didn't understand the difference between "not banned" and "allowed"?

2012, Essendon pumping aaod9604 into players

Aod9604 not allowed under S0 of the wada code.

EFC breaches wada code.

It's that simple.

Oh the guy that wrote the report didn't understand

Come on, are you serious ?

 

[rumply]

Ok, I'll have a crack at this. ACC report in feb 2013. Says aod9604 not banned. Ever thought that the guy who wrote the ACC report didn't understand the difference between "not banned" and "allowed"?

2012, Essendon pumping aaod9604 into players

Aod9604 not allowed under S0 of the wada code.

EFC breaches wada code.

It's that simple.

No pal, no it's not & like most of your comrades here, deep down you know its not, it's just an Essendon thing that prevents you from acknowledging that & also like most here that think that way you will be so bitterly disapointed - I await the DAY!

 

[Spongebob]

link?

The anti-doping rules in Australia comply with those set by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the organisation that defines the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code).

http://asada.gov.au/rules_and_violations/index.html

 

[Privateye]

So it looks like it is now "Stephen I don't have a record of the phone call Dank"

Is he sure he dialled the right number?

 

[the distributer]

The anti-doping rules in Australia comply with those set by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the organisation that defines the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code).​

There are eight ways in which an athlete or support person can breach the Code, or commit an Anti-Doping Rule Violation.​

Watch a video on rule violations and results management [streaming FLV - 17.04 MB]​

In Australia, ASADA’s role is to conduct the Results Management Process and to present information to the independent Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel about a potential violation of the Code.​

The independent Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel is made up of experts in the areas of sports medicine, sports law, clinical pharmacology, ethics and investigations. They assess the information presented to them, including information provided by the athlete, and then decide on:​

• whether to enter an athlete’s details on to the Register of Findings (a formal record of decisions on anti-doping rule violations and associated matters)
• whether to recommend a sanction to the sport.

The athlete is then given the opportunity to have a hearing before a sports tribunal. It is then up to the individual sport to sanction the athlete or support person.​

http://www.asada.gov.au/rules_and_violations/index.html​

 

[Saint Shags]

Look at it as puppa bear and baby bear

Exactly but hey what would we know.

ASADA must refer to WADA for what is and isn't allowed. They are the ones that give us those fantastic S0 and S2 clauses of course they supersede.

 

[pinot]

Oh the guy that wrote the report didn't understand

Come on, are you serious ?

You can not be for real. AOD is undergoing clinical trials so it can't be prohibited under S.2 - but its prohibited for human use so it goes to S.0. It's not that hard.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

ASADA is the first authority, WADA can over rule and appeal if findings are not to their liking, ASADA only goes of what WADA says.

so no link. Why do you reckon WADA refer everyone to ASADA, do you think?

 

[hoianbulldog]

Oh the guy that wrote the report didn't understand

Come on, are you serious ?

It was a report into crime, not sport. Aod9604 was so irrelevant to that report I'm surprised you are trying to hang your hat on it.

 

[Saint Shags]

so no link. Why do you reckon WADA refer everyone to ASADA, do you think?

Did you just miss the last 3 or so posts above yours?

 

[Saint Shags]

so no link. Why do you reckon WADA refer everyone to ASADA, do you think?

http://asada.gov.au/rules_and_violations/index.html

The anti-doping rules in Australia comply with those set by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the organisation that defines the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code).

 

[hoianbulldog]

so no link. Why do you reckon WADA refer everyone to ASADA, do you think?

They refer all enquiries to the local authority. They override or can appeal local authorities penalties.

You know that.

 

[Bomberboy2013]

It was a report into crime, not sport. Aod9604 was so irrelevant to that report I'm surprised you are trying to hang your hat on it.

Really so then The ACC report was not collaborated with ASADA ?

 

[hoianbulldog]

Really so then The ACC report was not collaborated with ASADA ?

Good point, EFC have nothing to worry about......take banned drugs and hope the ACC make a clerical error in their report.

Hird is a gun for bringing this strategy to EFC. You must be so proud.

 

[Spongebob]

A key relationship between WADA and the local ADA is local area actions and names.

Early on in all this was the chant of people taking Ventolin. If you look at the WADA list, Ventolin does not appear because it is a brand name. Look it up on ASADA Check Substances and there it is. On WADA, you find Salbutamol, one of the overarching names for Ventoin.

It is also really crucial in that WADA releases the Code, but medications can have different constituents rom country to country. So, the 2 or more sets of rules are required to be checked to ensure whatever it is meets the WADA Code.

 

[larson]

Essendon appear screwed for all money no matter which way you look at it. I just hope Melbourne were t stupid enough to implement a club wide program on the advice of this snake oil salesman as well though it would appear at least Trengove may have a case to answer. It is quite pathetic the way the media reports on this though and is amusing the way the HS chief football writer treats it with kiddy gloves because it is the team he loves. If it were any other team in the spotlight you can guarantee there would be much more inflammatory articles being published.

Surely you are taking the mickey? Have you read a paper in the last 3 months?

 

[Bomberboy2013]

Good point, EFC have nothing to worry about......take banned drugs and hope the ACC make a clerical error in their report.

Hird is a gun for bringing this strategy to EFC. You must be so proud.

Ok I just went on the ASADA website - check your substance section

I look up " chicken shit" I came up with nothing so it falls under S0.

Do players get banned taking this substance ???????

 

[sr36]

Really so then The ACC report was not collaborated with ASADA ?

The ACC report was only relevant in terms of AOD as it suggested that there was a chance that ASADA stuffed up and gave AOD the go ahead. There were many suggestions that ASADA had stuffed up and oked it. Dank has recently admitted that they didn't ok the drug.

The report was written after Essendon used AOD; they can't use it's wording to justify using AOD. The report obviously contains an error - probably the ommission of the word list. But that's irrelevant, WADA have clearly stated that AOD is and for all of last year was prohibited under the S0 clause.

 

[sr36]

Ok I just went on the ASADA website - check your substance section

I look up " chicken shit" I came up with nothing so it falls under S0.

Do players get banned taking this substance ???????

View attachment 17389

Essendon probably do think that it would be a reasonable and acceptable practice to inject chicken shit into the muscles of teenagers

 

[QuietB]

Ok, I'll have a crack at this. ACC report in feb 2013. Says aod9604 not banned. Ever thought that the guy who wrote the ACC report didn't understand the difference between "not banned" and "allowed"?

2012, Essendon pumping aaod9604 into players

Aod9604 not allowed under S0 of the wada code.

EFC breaches wada code.

It's that simple.

And ASADA clearly state to all people who ask that they need to make their own investigations in relation to SO. ASADA do not and will not confirm if something complies with SO.

It makes absolutely zero difference if ASADA were unsure of the status of AOD 9604 regarding AO.

 

[Demonic Ascent]

When it comes to stupidity, nothing is impossible for the red and the blue.

You know what they say about people in glass houses getting stoned...

 

[I Rock]

Ok I just went on the ASADA website - check your substance section

I look up " chicken shit" I came up with nothing so it falls under S0.

Do players get banned taking this substance ???????

View attachment 17389

Chicken shit is a natural compound so one would assume it falls under a different category.

 

[the distributer]

Ok I just went on the ASADA website - check your substance section

I look up " chicken shit" I came up with nothing so it falls under S0.

Do players get banned taking this substance ???????

View attachment 17389

chicken shit is not a close relative to HGH, though!