- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Posts
- 1,892
- Reaction score
- 719
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Bulls
Got done for 'possessing alcohol in a dry zone' at schoolies in Victor ($190 fine). Got the expiation notice a few weeks later. Then another week later I get a letter saying there was a 'clerical error' in the first expiation notice and that it had to be withdrawn and a new notice issued.
Anyway I get the new notice yesterday with a letter saying the reason the first notice had to be withdrawn was because of an incorrect due date. Now the date the first notice was issued was the 29th of November 2009, and the due date for payment was the 5th of January 2010. The date the second notice was issued was the 29th of December 2009 and the due date for payment is the 29th of January 2010.
It's my understanding that initially you are given 30 days to expiate an offence (however in never actually states this on the notice). With the first notice I was technically given 37 days to pay the fine, the reason for this notice being withdrawn. I only received the reissued notice on the 4th of January, hence only giving me 25 days to pay.
Now the reason I'm not happy is because it never actually says on the notice that you have 30 days to pay the fine, there is no timeframe to pay mentioned. So the original notice should never have been withdrawn because there was no error in the notice. On both the original and reissued notices my address (road and hometown) is spelt wrong, does that mean the notices should be withdrawn as they contain a 'clerical error'?
Anyway, I'm pissed off. Anybody else had a similiar experience?
Anyway I get the new notice yesterday with a letter saying the reason the first notice had to be withdrawn was because of an incorrect due date. Now the date the first notice was issued was the 29th of November 2009, and the due date for payment was the 5th of January 2010. The date the second notice was issued was the 29th of December 2009 and the due date for payment is the 29th of January 2010.
It's my understanding that initially you are given 30 days to expiate an offence (however in never actually states this on the notice). With the first notice I was technically given 37 days to pay the fine, the reason for this notice being withdrawn. I only received the reissued notice on the 4th of January, hence only giving me 25 days to pay.
Now the reason I'm not happy is because it never actually says on the notice that you have 30 days to pay the fine, there is no timeframe to pay mentioned. So the original notice should never have been withdrawn because there was no error in the notice. On both the original and reissued notices my address (road and hometown) is spelt wrong, does that mean the notices should be withdrawn as they contain a 'clerical error'?
Anyway, I'm pissed off. Anybody else had a similiar experience?




