What a joke...
No wonder Schu keeps winning, Ferrari cheat!!!!!
No wonder Schu keeps winning, Ferrari cheat!!!!!
-
-
System Upgrade - Search is back! - Post feedback.
-
Guest - BigFooty Tipping 2026 - Get on! - $500 first prize - Weekly Prizes - Click to Join
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
F1
- Thread starter -PC28-
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Tiger_Of_Old
THE_GUN:"Why don't you use your reg acc"7/9/24
ya beat me too it. what an absolute disgrace.shumacher should have said stuff team orders. why do it on the last corner geez.
f1.an absolute joke.
the f1 offocials should have the balls to disqualify shumacher.
cheers!
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2001
- Posts
- 5,281
- Reaction score
- 994
- Location
- Heaven
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood
As much as I love Schuey, I reckon you´re right PC. That´s race fixing, plain and simple.
It shouldn´t be allowed to happen. People pay a lot of money to watch the race, and also on betting. It really is cheating.
It shouldn´t be allowed to happen. People pay a lot of money to watch the race, and also on betting. It really is cheating.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2001
- Posts
- 663
- Reaction score
- 5
- Location
- Cricklewood
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood/Millwall
doesnt really mean you 'win' a race does it?????
and Mandy's point re betting is bang on.....when does Hansie Cronje get a F1 drive??????????
and Mandy's point re betting is bang on.....when does Hansie Cronje get a F1 drive??????????
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Thread starter
- #5
Schu and Rubins have just said, they will continue to do it until the title has been won...
In other words, don't bet against Schu
In other words, don't bet against Schu
What exactly happened? I figure Rubens slowed down and let Schuey past on the last corner, from what I've read here.
Macca19
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2001
- Posts
- 68,494
- Reaction score
- 106,300
- Location
- Albertr0n
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- MUFC, Orlando Magic
- Staff
- #7
It was always going to happen, but in all seriousness Schumacher, Ferrari and Barrichello should all be fined and have their race points taken away. F1 has to be the only sport in the world where you can constantly get away with fixing the end result of the race.
I remember when Coulthard moved over and let Hakkinen win in Australia 98 that the FIA said they would fine teams/drivers if they continued to do this. It seems Ferrari are too imtimidating for FIA to do this.
F**king ridiculous when a driver deserves to win but has to pull over for the 'good of the team'.
Crok of s**t. If this continues ill give up this sport...waste of time watching it when you know the result before the race
I remember when Coulthard moved over and let Hakkinen win in Australia 98 that the FIA said they would fine teams/drivers if they continued to do this. It seems Ferrari are too imtimidating for FIA to do this.
F**king ridiculous when a driver deserves to win but has to pull over for the 'good of the team'.
Crok of s**t. If this continues ill give up this sport...waste of time watching it when you know the result before the race
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2000
- Posts
- 62,351
- Reaction score
- 41,712
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Ford
Thats exactly what happened.
The person to blame for all this is Jean Todt,not the drivers.
Takuma Sato was lucky to escape serious injury in the accident with Heidfeld.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Posts
- 1,223
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Brisbane
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Essendon
Unfortunately, that is the culture of Formula 1.
Its funny though, I remember back in 99 (I think) when Schuey broke his leg in that accident at Silverstone, Eddie Irvine had a real chance to win the driver title. Schumacher came back at Malaysia (which was the last race of the year) and tried to help Irvine to get the title. But amazingly, Schuey didn't do all he could to get Irvine the win, but as the race was getting out of reach, Hakkinen took the win, and all but clinching the title, but Schumacher did some of the best laps of the race, when it was too late.
Barrichello is the unluckiest man in F1, as he always has to play second fiddle to Schuey. If the situation was reversed, would Schumacher move over?
Its funny though, I remember back in 99 (I think) when Schuey broke his leg in that accident at Silverstone, Eddie Irvine had a real chance to win the driver title. Schumacher came back at Malaysia (which was the last race of the year) and tried to help Irvine to get the title. But amazingly, Schuey didn't do all he could to get Irvine the win, but as the race was getting out of reach, Hakkinen took the win, and all but clinching the title, but Schumacher did some of the best laps of the race, when it was too late.
Barrichello is the unluckiest man in F1, as he always has to play second fiddle to Schuey. If the situation was reversed, would Schumacher move over?
Smokin
Norm Smith Medallist
I think people make the mistake that in F1 racing each car is an individual team. It's not.
Strategy plays a massive role - and part of that strategy is using two cars to acheive a desired result for the team. Remember, none of us are pumping over $200 million into the sport - Ferrari can say what they want because it is their team and they have their set goals.
Rubens was diplomatic - he signed his new contract, he knows he is the second driver. It wasnt suprising at all last night. If Rubens didnt agree with this, he would not have stayed with Ferrari.
Remember, in the past if the first driver crashed or broke down, he'd take the car of his teammate.
It's not new, and it's not suprising.
It is any different from when a teams #1 driver is in front, and the teams #2 driver is second and slows his lap time down to allow the first driver to keep extending his lead?
Remember, this is a team sport - not two individual drivers.
Is it different to a footy coach telling his forwards that whoever gets matched up with the oppositions star defender is to sacrifice his game and stay away from the action. Lead wide and often etc...something which happens often?
Its called sacrificing for the team - the team goals are more important than individual ones.
Strategy plays a massive role - and part of that strategy is using two cars to acheive a desired result for the team. Remember, none of us are pumping over $200 million into the sport - Ferrari can say what they want because it is their team and they have their set goals.
Rubens was diplomatic - he signed his new contract, he knows he is the second driver. It wasnt suprising at all last night. If Rubens didnt agree with this, he would not have stayed with Ferrari.
Remember, in the past if the first driver crashed or broke down, he'd take the car of his teammate.
It's not new, and it's not suprising.
It is any different from when a teams #1 driver is in front, and the teams #2 driver is second and slows his lap time down to allow the first driver to keep extending his lead?
Remember, this is a team sport - not two individual drivers.
Is it different to a footy coach telling his forwards that whoever gets matched up with the oppositions star defender is to sacrifice his game and stay away from the action. Lead wide and often etc...something which happens often?
Its called sacrificing for the team - the team goals are more important than individual ones.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Posts
- 1,223
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Brisbane
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Essendon
Exactly right Smokin. Schumacher said in the post race interview:
"The championship is the teams goal. Once that is achieved, we then can race between ourselves".
If you saw the story after the race on the costs of F1, then you'll realise that when a team budgets for $100million per season, then Barrichello taking the bump is small cookies.
By the way, did Montoya's car have the in-car camera during this race? He has one every race, so if he did, why didn't they show Heidfeld come screaming in front of him into Sato? Or was it too graphic?
"The championship is the teams goal. Once that is achieved, we then can race between ourselves".
If you saw the story after the race on the costs of F1, then you'll realise that when a team budgets for $100million per season, then Barrichello taking the bump is small cookies.
By the way, did Montoya's car have the in-car camera during this race? He has one every race, so if he did, why didn't they show Heidfeld come screaming in front of him into Sato? Or was it too graphic?
Winston Wolf
Debutant
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2001
- Posts
- 125
- Reaction score
- 1
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Beautifully put mongrelpunt !!! I think the on board footage may have been predominantly in Brown & White !!!
As for the people who refer to last night's team orders as "race fixing" you will find that the majority of them aren't avid grand prix watchers, and lack the understanding of team racing, team goals and team tactics, as opposed to individual results and (lol)...sports betting. As Smokin rightly states, it is nothing new, and dates all the way back to F1's inception. (has everybody suddenly forgotten the Coulthard & Hakkinen result in Melb 1998 ??? and that was the 1st race of the season !!!)
This race has at least put some interest in an otherwise boring start to the 2002 season to date. (because of the lack of overtaking and genuine racing on the track so far)
the whole thing is a joke !
Seriously, I question the validity of F1 to call itself a sport (not only because of race fixing). So much of the outcome of the race depends on the car....the faster the car, the more likely you are to win.
This year for example the Ferarri is clearly the best car and therefore unless it dies or crashes it will win. Exactly what does the driver contribute to this. If M.S. is such a great driver then put him in a Jag and see if he wins.
Surely that is the definition of a sport....that individual excellence delivers results. F1 is a glorified science quest. They should have one standard car....identical for each driver....and then let them race. Only then could it seriously be called a sport IMHO.
Satay Mat
Seriously, I question the validity of F1 to call itself a sport (not only because of race fixing). So much of the outcome of the race depends on the car....the faster the car, the more likely you are to win.
This year for example the Ferarri is clearly the best car and therefore unless it dies or crashes it will win. Exactly what does the driver contribute to this. If M.S. is such a great driver then put him in a Jag and see if he wins.
Surely that is the definition of a sport....that individual excellence delivers results. F1 is a glorified science quest. They should have one standard car....identical for each driver....and then let them race. Only then could it seriously be called a sport IMHO.
Satay Mat
Bloodstained Angel
Premiership Player
all motorsport is contrived
F1 is the most contrived motorsport of them all.
why are any of you surprised at what Schumacher did ?
F1 is always like this - if you honestly think there is anything 'sporting' happening out there - you need a reality check.
sorry for the usual cynicism but F1 is a very cynically run spectacle.
cheers
F1 is the most contrived motorsport of them all.
why are any of you surprised at what Schumacher did ?
F1 is always like this - if you honestly think there is anything 'sporting' happening out there - you need a reality check.
sorry for the usual cynicism but F1 is a very cynically run spectacle.
cheers
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2000
- Posts
- 62,351
- Reaction score
- 41,712
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Ford
I like Darrel Eastlakes comment after the race. "Bloody disgraceful !!!"
Well Darrel,thats what F1 fans have been saying about channel nine's coverage for years.
Well Darrel,thats what F1 fans have been saying about channel nine's coverage for years.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Thread starter
- #22
I like to think of F1 now as "Sports Entertainment"
Almost costs the same to watch it too
Almost costs the same to watch it too
Smokin
Norm Smith Medallist
What exactly is a "sport"? Doesnt really matter.
F1 is motor racing - very much a team/equipment environment. If you think F1 is simply the drivers against each other you are seriously mistaken.
call it what you like....
so long as you do not then hold up the F1 Champion as a great driver.
The best driver could have come last.
Why don't they give a trophy to the best mechanical engineer ???
Each to their own I suppose
so long as you do not then hold up the F1 Champion as a great driver.
The best driver could have come last.
Why don't they give a trophy to the best mechanical engineer ???
Each to their own I suppose