jannissary
AAAAAAAAAAARGH!
i recall going to a day of cricket ages ago where they gave out free juice outside the ground that wasn't allowed inThe big smash it should be renamed. And give everyone punch and juicies for free.
Watch it grow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
i recall going to a day of cricket ages ago where they gave out free juice outside the ground that wasn't allowed inThe big smash it should be renamed. And give everyone punch and juicies for free.
Watch it grow.
since we're always discussing the pros/cons of NZ teams in the BBL. maybe no more Super Smash soon? https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/plans-being-developed-for-nz20-league-in-january-2027-1513167
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Estimates of the value of a sale – based around the concept of selling 49 per cent stakes in six clubs and 100 per cent stakes in one each of the two Melbourne- and Sydney-based teams – have ranged between $600 and $800 million.
feels like a lot of damage control and not as much for grassroots, based on those suggested figures/allocations.The Big Bash has fallen so much that it'll only generate half a billion dollars for Australian cricket...
![]()
The 400 million reasons behind Cricket Australia’s Big Bash sale
How money raised from the partial sale of BBL teams would be carved up, and how much would go to grassroots cricket.www.smh.com.au
“Budget repair”feels like a lot of damage control and not as much for grassroots, based on those suggested figures/allocations.
You keep making this statement based on the subjective view on the decline in quality of cricketer being produced.“Budget repair”
Grassroots is cooked
Go deeper into the stats or better still talk to people involved or better still again be a participant.You keep making this statement based on the subjective view on the decline in quality of cricketer being produced.
Yet we're very often in the top 3 for test and odi rankings, and our dips below that don't last too long. We have competed in 2/3 WTC finals, under the old format were the nation that held the mace the most. We routinely make it to at least SF stages of ICC events and would undoubtedly have the most ICC trophies. Men and Women's cricket.
Participation is strong, with the ABS data from 13/14 suggesting around 270k participants in the game. The CA annual report for 23/24 had participation at around 660k people. The growth in girls and women's cricket has exploded in the last decade.
Grassroots cricket 'cooked' to my mind smells of confirmation bias.
cost of living currently also represents a big challenge for young families. cricket equipment isn't cheap, and the time sink for something like cricket significantly takes away from the opportunity to complete homework for young(er) people. compare that with basketball, soccer, futsal, afl etc and you'll see why there's limited amounts of people still participating in cricket at junior levels. only the most diehard kids will continue playing.Go deeper into the stats or better still talk to people involved or better still again be a participant.
I’ve been playing for 40 years and coaching for 25 years. My comments are based upon my knowledge and my knowledge of the stats that they are using.
Explosion in Mickey Mouse junior cricket is NOT helping senior cricket - like AFL the drop out rates at 14-16 are massive.
Happy to debate you but come armed with some material other than you don’t like what I am saying
That's a sweeping generalisation and somewhat presumptuous as well.Go deeper into the stats or better still talk to people involved or better still again be a participant.
So its based on your experiences then. Which while substantial in length would be just a snippet of the overall picture nationwide.I’ve been playing for 40 years and coaching for 25 years. My comments are based upon my knowledge and my knowledge of the stats that they are using.
And if you'd said that then I'd have agreed with you, but you weren't positing this time that short form cricket is eroding cricket skills but more 'grassroots is cooked'. Which depends on the metric you're using.Explosion in Mickey Mouse junior cricket is NOT helping senior cricket - like AFL the drop out rates at 14-16 are massive.
If you were to argue that grassroots level has some challenges, among them converting youth participation into adults then you'd have nearly all agreeing with you I'd imagine. It isn't about liking or disliking. It's about whether I agree with you. And I think you're approaching this broad topic with a very narrow lense.Happy to debate you but come armed with some material other than you don’t like what I am saying