Conspiracy Theory False Flag Shooting in Connecticut

[Malifice]

Anyway, so there were no assault rifles used.

Yawn.

Whether or not Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza used an assault rifle to kill 20 children and six adults at the Newtown elementary school last month has been a constant point of debate in the shooting’s wake — and those who “question the official narrative” have long maintained that Lanza used four handguns or pistols to carry out the deadly attack.

This week, claims that no assault rifle was used in the course of the killings at Sandy Hook began to circulate anew when a gun rights page on Facebook with many followers circulated a video posted by MSNBC that clearly stated Lanza did not use an assault rifle in the Newtown school shooting.

The clip stating the Sandy Hook shooter’s assault rifle was in the trunk went viral again, with many re-posters claiming that the clip was definitive proof the “official narrative” had been wrong, and that Lanza’s spree was carried out with no assault rifle used.

The catch? The clip regarding Lanza’s assault rifle was dated December 15 — recorded ahead even of the press conference with Dr. Wayne Carver, the medical examiner who autopsied the Newtown victims.

Still, the “no assault rifle used at Sandy Hook” claim lives on, with little published to counter it. This week, Connecticut State Police Lt. Paul Vance spoke out to address the issue, breaking a long spate of silence on the specifics of the Newtown massacre.

While Vance and his officers have released little to the press about the details of the murders, he did clarify the rumor that no assault rifle was used in the Sandy Hook shootings. Vance began:

“It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters … There’s no doubt that the rifle was used solely to kill 26 people in that school.”​

​

The Connecticut State Police spokesman added that regardless of the common misassumption that because an assault rifle was found in the trunk that Lanza did not use one in the spree, he has actually noted numerous times that all victims at Sandy Hook Elementary were killed with an assault weapon:

“I personally articulated that probably a dozen times in Newtown.”​

​

Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal also addressed the rumors Thursday, saying that there is no doubt an assault weapon was the one used by Lanza, and he commented:

“There’s no question that the AR-15 was used, the Bushmaster shot those children with multiple rounds and was instrumental in the massacre. Those children and educators might well be alive today if not for the assault weapon and high-capacity magazines.”​

​

“The shotgun was in the trunk of the car … The Bushmaster and two pistols were brought into the schoolhouse.”​

​

Despite the ongoing corrections, the belief Lanza did not use the Bushmaster in his attack continues to permeate pro-gun corners of the web.

http://www.inquisitr.com/497086/no-assault-rife-used-in-sandy-hook-shooting/#HwCOaWqZL9rRuVjw.99

A medical examiner checked the bodies. Dozens of police (State and Federal) checked the expended shells and cartriges.

If they cant tell the difference between a 5.56mm rifle round and a 9mm pistol (or 12 gauge shotgun) round, they all need new jobs.

 

[exe ex machina]

 

[exe ex machina]

 

[exe ex machina]

Some hard ****ing hitting proofs in those videos above.

 

[kane249]

Some hard ******* hitting proofs in those videos above.

The only proof is what Malifice posted, the rest is the same exaggerated misinterpretations that get pedalled as "THE TRUTH" by the conspiracy theorists

 

[exe ex machina]

 

[exe ex machina]

 

[Malifice]

Some hard ******* hitting proofs in those videos above.

Sigh.

 

[exe ex machina]

very hard to listen to this guy talk, but important info presented...

 

[Malifice]

very hard to listen to this guy talk, but important info presented...

GG - you honestly think that this was a massive conspiracy initated by the US Federal goverment, involving corporate intrests, State authorities, literally dozens of Governmental and NGO agencies, whereby they conspired to massacre dozens of American children (and set up a Patsy)... all for the purpouse of a token ban on assault rifles and better ways to stop crazy people and criminals getting access to guns?

You honestly think this is what this is?

 

[exe ex machina]

More important info...

 

[Malifice]

More important info...

Again GG - you honestly think that this was a massive conspiracy initated by the US Federal goverment, involving corporate intrests, State authorities, literally dozens of Governmental and NGO agencies, whereby they conspired to massacre dozens of American children (and set up a Patsy)... all for the purpouse of a token ban on assault rifles and better ways to stop crazy people and criminals getting access to guns?

You honestly think this is what this is?

Why not simply implement these laws without the massacre?

 

[exe ex machina]

Malifice

How about you actually watch/listen to the videos i've just posted for a change. Instead of just "sighing" and "you really believe" comments.

Dare you to watch and genuinely wrap an objective mind around it and try to respond to glaring points brought up in those videos.

Too many to name them all, and what minute:second of the videos, i'm asking you to watch/listen to notice them.

I can't respond to people who just don't tackle the info/video provided first. I'll happily read/listen to what you have to say after genuinely watching/listening to every minute. Keywords: genuinely, and every minute.

 

[exe ex machina]

Clear photoshopping. Kids on his lap have no legs!

 

[Malifice]

Dare you to watch and genuinely wrap an objective mind around it and try to respond to glaring points brought up in those videos.

Those 'points' have either all been thoroughly debunked already, or are supposition with no grounds in reality or objective truth.

How am I supposed to rebut a supposition based in a fantasy? It like trying to disprove a Christians belief in God.

I can't respond to people who just don't tackle the info/video provided first. I'll happily read/listen to what you have to say after genuinely watching/listening to every minute. Keywords: genuinely, and every minute.

Im asking you what you believe actually happened.

I believe that Adam Lanza was an alienated and disturbed young man, who through easy access to a small arsenal of high powered assault weapons, murdered his mother after a dispute of some kind and then proceeded to murder dozens of children and employees with an AR-15 assault rifle at a local primary school before shooting himself dead.

Much like the Virginia Tech murderer (and hundreds more like them) did.

This is what all the evidence (actual evidence) points to.

The Governments only complicity in the crime was allowing his mother (and vicariously him) easy access to said weaponry in the first place, and perhaps not providing adequate alternative schooling and mental health care for the boy.

 

[Malifice]

GG

What I'm really confused about, is if the Feds wanted to reduce the potency of the 2nd Amendment, wouldnt it be a shitload more elegant to simply stack the Supreme Court of the USA with either 'liberal' Justices, or (even worse) Corrupt Judges and then force a case on the 2nd Amendment through the court system?

The Judges could simply rule that the 'arms' provision of the 2nd Amendment doesnt apply to assault rifles or other classes of weapons, ban concealed carry, and expressly authorise the Feds to restrict ownership of certain classes of weapons or even restrict ownership and/or allow greater regulation.

Wouldnt this make a ton more sense (and be a million times more effective, foolproof and elegant) than orchestrating repeated mass murders invovling patsies, dozens of State and Federal agencies and thousands of dead children?

 

[exe ex machina]

More very important info....

 

[WinmarToLockett]

How about you actually watch/listen to the videos i've just posted... I can't respond to people who just don't tackle the info/video provided first.

I'll happily read/listen to what you have to say after genuinely watching/listening to every minute. Keywords: genuinely, and every minute.

Malifice posted an excellent piece which completely debunked the video you posted re: no assault rifle being used, yet you had absolutely no response to it, despite claiming (several times) that you would read/listen/watch everything presented, and admit when you were wrong.

Your only response so far has been posting hours of ridiculous and factually incorrect conspiracy videos, supplied with the caveat that you could not engage in debate any furthur until these amatuer videos were viewed.

Absolutely pathetic.

 

[exe ex machina]

Malifice

you have still failed to watch/listen to any of the videos. cant fool me. you haven't responded to ANY of the dozens of points that the videos focus on.

instead you go on a rant about the 2nd amendment (which im not asking you to comment on, and which the videos do not discuss whatsoever). the videos focus specifically on the incident itself, the people involved, their backgrounds, and info exposed (that you would notice if you watched).

respond to the specific points in the videos

for instance....had you watched, you wouldve noted one bit of info was that the car said to be lanza's mom's car is in fact registered to someone else, and they tell you who it is and what his background is.

there are many more such things yet to be watched/listened to and thus responded to by malifice.

 

[Malifice]

Weirdly, not only have the Feds (and thier NWO co-conspirators) not bothered to address the Supreme Court (who remain the only institution in the world who can interpret and amend the second amendement outside of referendum), but they have instead stacked the Court the other way with a Conservative pro Gun bench.

To the point that when a 2nd Amendment case actually did come before the Supreme Court (District of Columbia v Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia, and guaranteed the right to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, including self-defense.

Just seems like a really really stupid thing for the NWO guys to forget to do, in amongst all the dozens of conspiracies, False Flags, corruption, money and mass murders.

And a massive hole in the Conspiracy argument to boot.

 

[Malifice]

you have still failed to watch/listen to any of the videos. cant fool me. you haven't responded to ANY of the dozens of points that the videos focus on.

Ive watched them and debunked many of the factual inaccuracies.

I cant debunk the outrageous suppositions and allusions, because thats all they are. Supposition and allusions based on false evidence and a ridiculous paradigm lacking in any factual grounds.

instead you go on a rant about the 2nd amendment

Or course I go on about the second amendment. The entire premise of your position is that the NWO/ Feds planned and exected this whole thing to remove the second amendment!

for instance....had you watched, you wouldve noted one bit of info was that the car said to be lanza's mom's car is in fact registered to someone else, and they tell you who it is and what his background is.

Whats the relevance who owned the family car?

How does this undermine the case against Adam Lanza at all?

 

[exe ex machina]

The relevance is because that was the who was captured in the forest and let go, and it's worth your while to find out exactly who that person is and what their background and ties are. You want to debunk stuff...how can you debunk this bit of info until you find out who it is and what their background is etc, and THEN try to find stuff about it to debunk it.

Why you should watch those videos posted, note down all the new points presented, and THEN go out and gather stuff to post back as a way to debunk.

There is plenty of other bits of info just waiting for you to absorb....for eg, that lanza's death was officially processed the day before Sandy Hook. Or that Soto's RIP facebook page was officially posted 4 days before Sandy Hook, then deleted and reposted the day after it happened. Or, that the victim tribute video of Sandy Hook victims was posted on vimeo a whole year before it happened, and same with lanza's picture in a video of twisted mass shooters, a whole year before it happened.

Etc with a wide array of different points in all those videos.

 

[Malifice]

The relevance is because that was the who was captured in the forest and let go,

So he drove his Brothers car instead of his Mums?

This proves what exactly?

There is plenty of other bits of info just waiting for you to absorb....for eg, that lanza's death was officially processed the day before Sandy Hook.

No, it wasnt.

Or that Soto's RIP facebook page was officially posted 4 days before Sandy Hook, then deleted and reposted the day after it happened.

Why would the NWO make such a rookie mistake?

Why would the NWO hack his FB page, and post RIP 4 days before they were to execute a mass murder machiavellian in scope and detail?

Or, that the victim tribute video of Sandy Hook victims was posted on vimeo a whole year before it happened, and same with lanza's picture in a video of twisted mass shooters, a whole year before it happened.

Do you know the difference between a meme and a fact?

 

[exe ex machina]

Just a couple videos focusing on Emilie Parker, identifying her hair and facial mole in pictures before she died, and pictures seen alive with Obama after Sandy Hook...

 

[exe ex machina]

Lol, i love how you're too terrified to watch any of the videos....via your response that the car was his brothers. Obvious you havent watched it to find out whose car it really was

I thought you were some debunker, or self-proclaimed debunker extraordinaire? Instead, you've done nothing in regards the videos presented.

ODN >>>>>> daylight >>>>>> night time >>>>>>> a million other people >>>>>> malifice when it comes to genuine attempts at absorbing new info and attempting a serious debunk.