Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If they mistook you for a woman, I'd question their mental faculties as well!

Lol
I didn't read all that waffle, but I know a number of women essentially forced out of a big 4 bank due to maternity leave when seeking to return to their jobs, so, I don't think that anyone is getting a leg up
 
Last edited:
Lol
I didn't read all that waffle, but I know a number of women essentially forced out of a big 4 bank due to maternity leave when seeking to return to their jobs, so, I don't think that anyone is getting a leg up
Of course you didn't read it. It would of been beyond you anyway! :thumbsu:
 
Women are more likely than men to commit fraud. Some women are dishonest and manipulative. Dishonest and manipulative men also commit fraud, but let's talk about how being dishonest and manipulative are traits of femininity. That's essentially what the mainstream media continuously does with men and violence.

Good post! I agree 100%.

Feminism purposefully paints what is a categoric minority of males as having their issues attached with their gender, rather than as human individuals. Thus painting the rest as potentially the same which is wrong in my view.

While women get favoured on the other side with having no negative traits, basically considered angels in the popular opinions of the people, social and general media. Even education now to an extent with feminism changing the way boys are treated in schooling having a negative impact that has been clearly observed over the past 15-20 years.

It's got to be consistent in order to avoid being blatant sexism and damaging gender dynamics. Either it's neither gender has negative traits attached to it, or both do and fair play to assess both genders with equal weight. Equality.. radical notion. :thumbsu:
 
Of course you didn't read it. It would of been beyond you anyway! :thumbsu:
I think that I am the only one still reading your posts, most have you on ignore.:p
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Has anyone seen that ANZ ad about how girls 'start off so far ahead'?

It's really quite a strange ad, and given who the messenger is, I wouldn't trust it...


woeful woeful ad. Just mimicking the ingrained victim mentality of the sisterhood
 
Oh and in regards to gamer gate, they are clearly losing the battle. Female characters are flooding major games, and gender is being torn down. Homosexual relationships are becoming common.

They can make all the rape threats they want. They are losing. The attitude below is being exposed for the misogyny it is.

You don't even make sense... I'm going to mostly address your most odd inclusion into this thread. Homosexual relationships have been common for about 60 years or more. It's just they used to be treated with more bigotry from the general populus. Gamergate has nothing to do with acceptance of gay relationships one way or the other. Is that truly what you are positing, that gay relationships are becoming more common because of gamers in culture being accused of sexism by baseless feminist victims and corrupt journalists? And then sheeples on social media who don't understand the movement or the facts around it agreed? That is your basis for a battle won for homosexual relationships? :rolleyes:

BTW, if "gender is being torn down" how can you have homosexual relationships? (or for that matter even be critical of how females are perceived in videogames if gender is something to be disregarded as unimportant). You lack logical consistency. Homosexual as a sexual preference stems from gendered individuals dating their own gender. If you are in a relationship with someone for non gender attributes that is not homosexuality even if you both have male genitals. That is called pansexual.

You make no sense man. You simply make no sense.

There are men, in their hundreds of millions who identify with their male identity, who date men. These are gay men. Males. There are women, in their hundreds of millions who identify with their female identity, who date women. These are lesbian women. Females. There are both genders who identify with their physical gender who are attracted to and date both genders. These are bisexual people. How has "gender been torn down" in those scenarios?

You will find the majority of the planet identifies with their gender, recognises gender is part of them, important to them and of those around them, part of science (which has empirical evidence on its side) and history and art and creativity. Part of the very fabric of human kind. Even if you think all the rest is meaningless, if you somehow think gamergate has circumvented science, more power to your delusion.
 
No. Just some marketing and the sexist attitude that women are not capable of competing with men in the private sector.

I'm not convinced it's not a marketing gimmick. Let's see how long it lasts.

As to competing, what's your experience with women in the private sector?
 
You don't even make sense... I'm going to mostly address your most odd inclusion into this thread. Homosexual relationships have been common for about 60 years or more. It's just they used to be treated with more bigotry from the general populus. Gamergate has nothing to do with acceptance of gay relationships one way or the other. Is that truly what you are positing, that gay relationships are becoming more common because of gamers in culture being accused of sexism by baseless feminist victims and corrupt journalists? And then sheeples on social media who don't understand the movement or the facts around it agreed? That is your basis for a battle won for homosexual relationships? :rolleyes:

BTW, if "gender is being torn down" how can you have homosexual relationships? (or for that matter even be critical of how females are perceived in videogames if gender is something to be disregarded as unimportant). You lack logical consistency. Homosexual as a sexual preference stems from gendered individuals dating their own gender. If you are in a relationship with someone for non gender attributes that is not homosexuality even if you both have male genitals. That is called pansexual.

You make no sense man. You simply make no sense.

There are men, in their hundreds of millions who identify with their male identity, who date men. These are gay men. Males. There are women, in their hundreds of millions who identify with their female identity, who date women. These are lesbian women. Females. There are both genders who identify with their physical gender who are attracted to and date both genders. These are bisexual people. How has "gender been torn down" in those scenarios?

You will find the majority of the planet identifies with their gender, recognises gender is part of them, important to them and of those around them, part of science (which has empirical evidence on its side) and history and art and creativity. Part of the very fabric of human kind. Even if you think all the rest is meaningless, if you somehow think gamergate has circumvented science, more power to your delusion.
I don't know why, but whenever I see one of your posts, this pops into my head. Weird huh?
giphy.gif
 
In an address to an International Women’s Day breakfast in which he compared himself to former American president Richard Nixon:D, Abbott said his wife quipped having three daughters helped turn an “unreconstructed bloke into a feminist”.
This is what a feminist looks like.
tony-abbott-1.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

11836765_894803527247909_7225553152538818752_n.jpg


What..?

What is with the left and the victim mentality?
Yes, it is what a particular feminist looks like.

Newsflash - every person, including feminists, will make dumb statements that a lot of people would disagree with. Jeffreys' seems particularly adept at making such statements, but then, hey so does Sam Newman.
 
They and feminism do view women as needing coddling, a leg up, and to be told they can accomplish something. Wonder why that is? Could it be as a general rule they don't have the ambition and confidence of their own free will to strive for these "successes"?

They act like the reverse is happening. This isn't 1970. I've been told exactly 2 times in my life I couldn't do something because I'm a woman. And it was two of the most irrelevant opinions in all of human existence. If women are listening to 70-80 year old fogey men who are so jealous and past it they hate everythng with a scattershot, and are influenced by these opinions they are so low of character and mental faculties they didn't deserve a job as CEO of a company, or a job in the STEM fields.

=====================

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/

11. Emotional reasoning. You let your feelings guide your interpretation of reality. “I feel depressed; therefore, my marriage is not working out.”
Wow QFFT. Stupid feelings based interpretations of reality. Like "rape culture". Safe spacers love that 3rd wave interpretation of reality.

Pretty much sums up a lot of what is wrong in today's society. People are sold this idea other people should be making them happy instead of that your happiness lies in your own mind, your own thoughts should rule your mental state. Emotions are something you need to process, and even challenge.

But nah.. "You aren't living up to x y z. Therefore you must be why I have problems, why I'm unhappy. Removing you will make me better." -- "You are causing xyz in my life, removing you will fix me"

It's delusional. Just put on a shirt that says "I fail at understanding and cultivating interpersonal relationships"
Seems from your likes, you are getting quite a fan club.:p
Birds of a feather...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom