Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[Maggie5]

The goat discussion was far more interesting than anything that had been posted in that thread for weeks. It's the same old circular arguments over and over again, complete with walls of text from tesseract and whoever decided to engage him on that particular day. It's quite reasonable to discuss marriage to animals in a thread dedicated to discussing marriage equality.
If you really think that 'the majority of my posts' indicate that I don't support gay marriage you struggle with basic comprehension, are unable to separate discussion of facts and concepts from cheerleading, and feel the need to categorise anyone who does not continually cheerlead for gay marriage into the 'anti' camp. Your difficulty in accepting my stated support for gay marriage is due to cognitive dissonance as accepting same would throw your rigid assumptions into disarray.

Wow, that is what I call a comeback and an admission
Finally!

 

[kfc1]

Wow, that is what I call a comeback and an admission
Finally!

What did I admit?

 

[romeohwho]

The goat stuff on the other thread was complete rubbish. No need to bring it over here thanks.

 

[Maggie5]

What did I admit?

That you think that the goat discussion was 'interesting' despite many reply posts indicating the opposite!
You are either very self-centred or delusional. "It's quite reasonable to discuss marriage to animals in a thread dedicated to discussing marriage equality."
Just as well I don't have 'reasonable' people like you in my life.
Not too bad at projection either if I might say.

 

[Maggie5]

The goat stuff on the other thread was complete rubbish. No need to bring it over here thanks.

You are right, the thread get blurred occasionally, will take it to the other thread. Sorry.

 

[kfc1]

That you think that the goat discussion was 'interesting' despite many reply posts indicating the opposite!
You are either very self-centred or delusional. "It's quite reasonable to discuss marriage to animals in a thread dedicated to discussing marriage equality."
Just as well I don't have 'reasonable' people like you in my life.
Not too bad at projection either if I might say.

This is just a jumble of statements which make little sense.
Where have I ever said that the goat discussion wasn't interesting?
Why am I self-centred to find it interesting?
Why am I delusional to think that discussing all marriage possibilities is reasonable in a thread dedicated to discussing same?

 

[Maggie5]

This is just a jumble of statements which make little sense.
Where have I ever said that the goat discussion wasn't interesting?
Why am I self-centred to find it interesting?
Why am I delusional to think that discussing all marriage possibilities is reasonable in a thread dedicated to discussing same?

Not going to continue to derail this thread and frankly I am over it.

 

[TheWoodenSlug]

Marrying goats?

 

[romeohwho]

You are right, the thread get blurred occasionally, will take it to the other thread. Sorry.

Haha -you're not the one with the obsession!

 

[tesseract]

It isn't religious but one of my favourite links that I mistakenly read and is a fun read.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/feminism-todays-womens-ku-klux-klan/, was a great read KKK being an authority on women, hahahaha
No comment from you just the headline and the link.

I find your attempt at reason amusing. It's "bullshit" because it's "a great and fun read". There's no real reason given, but, but, but... your fweeeeelings.

What a joke you are.

Oh no! Not another feminist shaming tactic! Nnnoooooooooooooooooo!

I am so fortunate that I grew up with a father and 3 brothers who didn't think like you nor saw females like you do.

I wouldn't say fortunate, for it played a part in developing the damaged persona we see displayed in this forum today.

 

[tesseract]

That Valerie Solanas sounds like she goes alright.

Valerie Solanis' SCUM manifesto is still required reading in some women's studies courses. Indoctrinating women about a feminist utopian idea of a society for cutting up men? How utterly disgusting and evil! Yet many a feminist give their implicit support for this manifesto by not calling out their own and distancing themselves from such.

 

[Little Big John]

tesseract, how do you separate your subjective feelings from objective reality?

 

[CM86]

I wouldn't say fortunate, for it played a part in developing the damaged persona we see displayed in this forum today.

Evidence that Maggie has a damaged persona?

Or is it just your fweeeelings?

I wouldn't say fortunate, for it played a part in developing the damaged persona we see displayed in this forum today.

Oh no! Not another feminist shaming tactic! Nnnoooooooooooooooooo.

 

[cartwright]

Evidence that Maggie has a damaged persona?

Or is it just your fweeeelings?


Oh no! Not another feminist shaming tactic! Nnnoooooooooooooooooo.

I'm not sure a psychopath has feelings

Just more proof of what a ****ing w***er this guy is.

 

[cartwright]

It isn't religious but one of my favourite links that I mistakenly read and is a fun read.
http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/feminism-todays-womens-ku-klux-klan/, was a great read KKK being an authority on women, hahahaha
No comment from you just the headline and the link. What a joke you are.

I am so fortunate that I grew up with a father and 3 brothers who didn't think like you nor saw females like you do.
They would have laughed at you (very loudly).

same.
I'd imagine tess feeling very inadequate in the company of real men.

 

[cartwright]

Yes, good to see Australian data, but the data presented is relatively useless in determining any causation.
Such a small increase in pay gap can be caused by anything - quite likely more higher paid women retiring or otherwise moving on.

It was one example of many.... And more relevant than elite sportspeople

 

[romeohwho]

Valerie Solanis' SCUM manifesto is still required reading in some women's studies courses. Indoctrinating women about a feminist utopian idea of a society for cutting up men? How utterly disgusting and evil! Yet many a feminist give their implicit support for this manifesto by not calling out their own and distancing themselves from such.

Do you know the context, if as you claim, her manifesto is being studied in Women's courses? Suspect it would be just a study of the history of radical feminism which is fair enough and should be looked at.
With regard to her ideas being 'worshipped -well, she was a paranoid schizophrenic who shot people-so her legacy might be questionable. The lecturers and the students probs go -wow what a whacko-similar reaction to the one I have when you post links to whackos on youtube.
More interesting to me is that you know what is studied on these courses.

 

[Gough]

Valerie Solanis' SCUM manifesto is still required reading in some women's studies courses. Indoctrinating women about a feminist utopian idea of a society for cutting up men? How utterly disgusting and evil! Yet many a feminist give their implicit support for this manifesto by not calling out their own and distancing themselves from such.

It's as much part of feminist history as Seneca Falls, and you can't airbrush history. I would think any modern student worth their salt would treat the SCUM manifesto with a fairly critical eye, and look at it in the context of the time anyway.

 

[Maggie5]

I wouldn't say fortunate, for it played a part in developing the damaged persona we see displayed in this forum today.

I take enormous offence at what you have posted if you are referring to me.

 

[kfc1]

I take enormous offence at what you have posted if you are referring to me.

diddums

 

[cartwright]

diddums

Why did you feel the need to post that?

Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

 

[kfc1]

Why did you interject with that?

Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

Why did you interject with your post?
Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

 

[cartwright]

Why did you interject with your post?
Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

Oh good. That's what a three year old does. Carry on goat herder.

 

[kfc1]

Oh good. That's what a three year old does. Carry on goat herder.

I'm not sure what sort of answer you were expecting from such a post. Childish post = childish response.

 

[CM86]

Why did you feel the need to post that?

Are you upset the attention isn't on you?

He is desperate for attention, and upset that people are having a go at tesseract. (they have a lot in common.)