- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 5,914
- Reaction score
- 10,951
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Portland Trailblazers
- Thread starter
- #7,226
How many years have you spent as a primary care giver for a child?
Eleven. Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

How many years have you spent as a primary care giver for a child?
Let's not forget the most gripping discussion to arise in this thread - who should open doors for whom.The air-con thing was pretty much accurate: women's skin temp is a good 3 degrees lower and the standards were put in place at a time when most office workers were men. No judgement, just a simple set of facts.
I come here to read about some of the myths that come from the anti-feminists that end up as world news and are accepted as facts by them.
Oh, and also for a laugh.
Were you/are you unemployable?Eleven. Why?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Were you/are you unemployable?
Yep but why can't they swap after the first year and the female returns to work whilst the make scales his job back? Not many reasons against that arrangement?The fact that she has the uterus and the breasts mean that the wife has to take at least some time out of her career to have a child. For many families, the decision is made for the husband to keep the money coming in (hopefully advancing in his career) while the wife, after taking the year or so out of work that is pretty much unavoidable, takes over the bulk of household management. This arrangement makes sense for the average family that doesn't have the luxury of letting both parents take time off, or of jumping in and out of the workforce at will. It's not necessarily a sexist arrangement and the natural consequences of it (higher average male earnings and greater career progression over a lifetime) aren't necessarily an indication that women are being hard done by.
That statement would be fine if you expanded it to include the other side who would also rather not discuss it. Given opportunity, they choose to make ad hominem attacks and put words in people's mouths.
Do you actually contribute anything Maggie? Dont think i've read a single thing from you that isnt moralistic high ground grandstanding.
The view that you are irrefutably correct in every single opinion that exists as a glimmer in your mind, and that you are fighting the good fight, the moral fight the just fight means you never actually say anything of importance
Yep but why can't they swap after the first year and the female returns to work whilst the make scales his job back? Not many reasons against that arrangement?
Do you think there is anything that has happened/is happening in your life, that could make you look unfavorably on females?Not sure what you're getting at. I worked and studied part-time until my kids were old enough to be able to get themselves home from school, at which time I returned to full-time work as soon as I could (which was about 18 months ago). I'm still their primary carer and receive $20 per child per week from their also full-time employed mother (who has them for about 5 nights per month).
Well that's a fairly awful thing to say/assumeDo you think there is anything that has happened/is happening in your life, that could make you look unfavorably on females?
Oh?Well that's a fairly awful thing to say/assume
Similar to victim blaming actually.
Yep but why can't they swap after the first year and the female returns to work whilst the make scales his job back? Not many reasons against that arrangement?
Yep but why can't they swap after the first year and the female returns to work whilst the make scales his job back? Not many reasons against that arrangement?
You see let me explain it to you. Women have utereses. They give birth. Based on that biological fact there is a false assumption that women should be the primary care givers once they finish breast feeding (which is a total myth). As a result of this myth few men do the hard yards and put their career in a holding pattern while they pick the kiddies up from school etc. This creates structural problems in the workforce that inhibit the career aspirations of woman that would NOT otherwise exist if men and woman shared the post breast feeding responsibilities of child rearing equally. The whole thing is based on a demonstrably false and sexist assumption - see its not that hard
See, this is a great thing about feminism and equality. Previously, flea bitten would not have had the opportunity to be the primary care giver.![]()
Do you think there is anything that has happened/is happening in your life, that could make you look unfavorably on females?
So, you're of the opinion that before feminism, men never raised children?
Yep agree -this is often what happens and of course goes a long way to explaining why women are disadvantaged in the workforce.That's all well and good providing each woman has just one child. That's not usually the case though.
-A few months off in the later stages of pregnancy.
-6-12 months off with the newborn/"breastfeeding repsonsibilities"
-a couple of years back at work
-Bub number 2 is conceived.
-another few months off at the end of pregnancy.
-another 6-12 months off with the newborn etc.
-back to work for a few years
Can you guess what happens if they decide to have a third kid?
The reason more men don't take time off is because 2nd and 3rd children often follow not long after the first. It doesnt make sense for fathers to stay home in these situations, because the mother will be there anyway carrying/breastfeeding the new baby.
Are they?Yep agree -this is often what happens and of course goes a long way to explaining why women are disadvantaged in the workforce.
Where did I say raise? I said primary care giver. Please don't put words into my mouth. Thought you were better than that. I know of a few men who have chose to be SAHD, and or take a day off a week to care for their kids. See how feminism, and the options it has brought, have been a positive impact on your life!?![]()
What is it with you and that freaking air conditioning article? Is that all you have to hang your hat on? I don't bang on about the significantly greater sexism in the media, like say the Daily Telegraph making a horse the Australian sportswoman of the year. That trumps your little air-conditioning article a thousand fold. Get a grip.It's not just Panahi. There are many women from the Islamic world who have called out modern Western feminists for their pettiness, selfishness and lack of perspective. If there are feminists expressing concerns about Islam, they're not doing it near as effectively as the feminists complaining about air-conditioning in their office or what some celebrity has been tweeting.
Did they really? That's some quality trollingWhat is it with you and that freaking air conditioning article? Is that all you have to hang your hat on? I don't bang on about the significantly greater sexism in the media, like say the Daily Telegraph making a horse the Australian sportswoman of the year. That trumps your little air-conditioning article a thousand fold. Get a grip.
