News Fixturing changes for 2014

Remove this Banner Ad

Noidenous

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 2, 2012
8,315
9,641
Climbing out your mum's window
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Green Bay Packers, Manchester UTD
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-08-28/full-statement-from-the-afl

"...All up, clubs would each play 22 games across 25 weeks through March 14-16 (week one of round one) to August 29-31.

The structure for the Toyota AFL Finals Series remains unchanged from the current top eight format.

Separately, Mr Lethlean said the AFL Commission had also approved a more formalised ‘weighted’ rule to govern the five double match-ups for each club as part of the premiership season.

In the construction of each year’s fixture, the final ladder will be grouped into the top six teams, middle six teams and bottom six teams with regard to better managing the equality of double match-ups for all clubs the following season.

  • Sides ranked 1-6 on the ladder will have a minimum of two double-meetings with other top six sides and a maximum of three meetings with sides ranked 1-6. They will have a minimum of one double-meeting of sides ranked 7-12 and a maximum of two double-meetings of sides in the 7-12 range. They will have either no double meetings or a maximum of one double meeting with a side ranked 13-18.

  • Sides ranked 7-12 on the ladder will have a minimum of one double-meeting with sides ranked 1-6 on the ladder and a maximum of two meetings with sides ranked 1-6. They will have a minimum of two double-meetings of sides ranked 7-12 and a maximum of three double-meetings of sides 7-12. They will have a minimum of one double-meeting of sides ranked 13-18 and a maximum of two double-meetings of sides ranked 13-18.

  • Sides ranked 13-18 on the ladder will have either no double meeting or a maximum of one double meeting with a side ranked 1-6. They will have a minimum of one double-meeting with sides ranked 7-12 and a maximum of two double-meetings of sides ranked 7-12. They will have a minimum of two double-meetings of sides ranked 13-18 and a maximum of three double-meetings of sides 13-18.

“The weighting of second-time match ups for clubs enables the AFL to better deal with the key requirement of equality, as well as continuing to ensure that our venue obligations and our broadcast obligations can be met,” Mr Lethlean said.

“Retaining a pre-set fixture for each season ahead, rather than re-fixturing the final rounds of the season after all clubs have played each other once across 17 rounds, better enables the AFL to manage travel loads of the non-Victorian clubs in particular, and ensure that key games such as Derbies, Showdowns, Q Clashes and major blockbusters can be accommodated twice in a season,” he said...."
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I guess it doesn't take into account the potential for teams to improve. For example, I think North are better than their ladder position suggests and next year they'll be firmly top 8. GWS also have the potential to have a year like GC have after winning the spoon this year.

However, at least the AFL are making steps to make the fixture fairer and this is probably the best way to do it :thumbsu:
 
If Roo and Joey are still going strong and our kids can hit the ground running we could shoot up the ladder pretty quickly.

All of a sudden Goddard 2.0 seems a way off.....
 
I see there being more possibility of a Grand Final between sides lower down the home and away ladder; for example, 3rd and 4th.

That aside, there's only 5 double-meetings as 17 rounds covers all other teams for the first instance.

A side from the bottom 6 teams might pick up 4-8 more points than they usually would, thus making the spread below 8th position a lot tighter (although, it's been pretty tight this year with only 3 games separating the sides formerly below Essendon - or 8th-15th).

For one, Collingwood have Sydney and Freo in their bracket, meaning a double-meeting with either (or both) requires them to travel interstate for their return legs.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top