Remove this Banner Ad

Fraser Anning watch

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dry Rot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Here on a screenshot I’ve been sent from some social media platform (dunno which one don’t use them) Collingwood’s Stephenson seems to be grandstanding saying that the treatment of Anning is more or less the same as unfair treatment against people because of their race or gender identity. Yikes.View attachment 639358

Looks like https://www.instagram.com/jaidynlstephenson/?hl=en but I don't have the secret powers to see that post, do you need to be a follower or a Twitter or some other weird social media shit?
 
Looks like https://www.instagram.com/jaidynlstephenson/?hl=en but I don't have the secret powers to see that post, do you need to be a follower or a Twitter or some other weird social media shit?

If this was Andrew Bolt, I would have been smacking away at my keyboard without fact-checking, but as this person is an AFL player I am all over the Internet trying to verify this before I comment.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I read it, on a site called "reddit"

But cannot see any kind of verification...?

Pretty disappointing that he would get involved in such a hot topic.
 
Still not verified though.

He is a good player, and I tipped Collingwood to win tonight. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for the time being...
Think it may be true sadly.
 
Clearly hasn't read about the scribe class in ancient Egypt, or the armies of bureaucrats of the ancient Chinese empires.

Delete all after read.
 
What, that he didn't REALLY mean to say that...erm...people shouldn't be egged or attacked in our political system?

So if a person abuses their position of authority and power to spread fear and hatred to engineer a response... actually gets a response... and in this case, which is rarely the case in terrorist related incidents, one of the people who was responsible bore the brunt. That's a bad thing?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

See my earlier post re: Fraser Anning if you want my specific thoughts.

Here, now, I am addressing what you meant when you thought Jaidyn didn't really mean what he said.

When you read something on the Internet do you verify it? That’s what I was doing...
 
No you said you were giving him the benefit of the doubt that it wasn't his statement. My point was...if it was his statement...what was the benefit of the doubt for? Why would it be controversial in any way, if he had indeed posted that?
 
No you said you were giving him the benefit of the doubt that it wasn't his statement. My point was...if it was his statement...what was the benefit of the doubt for? Why would it be controversial in any way, if he had indeed posted that?

Because what if “egg boy” was colour-blind? And thought Anning was brown? Anning would have got the response he wanted.
 
5rLGv79.jpg
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom