Movie Ghostbusters 3

[Magpiespower]

Oh shit, Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II double bill starting on 7Mate right now!

Been meaning to watch them both again before you know what.

Well, that's tonight's viewing sorted...

 

[Magpiespower]

First reviews in.

SPOILERS muh****az, spoilers...

Variety
Hollywood Reporter
New York Times
IGN
Hitflix
THR Reviews Round-up

 

[ManWithNoName]

74% on RT. Not bad.

 

[pantskyle]

First reviews in.

SPOILERS muh****az, spoilers...

Variety
Hollywood Reporter
New York Times
IGN
Hitflix
THR Reviews Round-up

The NYT one is laughable.

 

[peternorth]

i just dunno how to feel. part of me wants to see and enjoy it like any other movie. the other has been bombarded with cries of anti feminism, anti men, pro feminism, pro men, sexism, misogyny. i feel i cant see it and comment in fear of being judged one way or another. if i don't like it, im anti women.

 

[pantskyle]

i just dunno how to feel. part of me wants to see and enjoy it like any other movie. the other has been bombarded with cries of anti feminism, anti men, pro feminism, pro men, sexism, misogyny. i feel i cant see it and comment in fear of being judged one way or another. if i don't like it, im anti women.

Just download the movies once it becomes available which will likely be pretty quick for a watchable copy.

 

[peternorth]

Just download the movies once it becomes available which will likely be pretty quick for a watchable copy.

sounds good. gonna do the same with tarzan after some less than desirable reviews. plus the margot robbie/jane as the damsel wearing long white dress/falls over a twig, in distress wears thin

 

[edgie]

Had to sit through the preview last night. Urgh.

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Tapatalk

 

[Bomberboyokay]

74% on RT. Not bad.

Reviewers clearly threatened by Sony to fall in line with the Hollywood-New York liberal feminist agenda or suffer the consequences /afewpostershere

 

[pantskyle]

Reviewers clearly threatened by Sony to fall in line with the Hollywood-New York liberal feminist agenda or suffer the consequences /afewpostershere

Reviewers seem to be spot on mostly with what others thought, movie is a turd but that's not the fault of the cast, I'm glad Feige is getting heat with this, looks like he ****ed it well up.

 

[Andre]

The NYT one is laughable.

It's the NYT. After all the backlash against it, if it'd been 2 hours of them shitting on pictures of ghosts they'd still have given it a top rating.

 

[SnakeMan86]

Even if the movies alright, the angry nostalgia sooks will never be convinced so and will shitcan it just because its not the version they wanted.
Watch it with an open mind and take it for what it is.

 

[RolandF1]

 

[Sub_Zero]

Even if the movies alright, the angry nostalgia sooks will never be convinced so and will shitcan it just because its not the version they wanted.
Watch it with an open mind and take it for what it is.

Taking it for the pile of shit that it is

 

[Catfish Alley]

Been a pretty shit year for movies actually. I doubt this would be close to being the worst of them.

 

[edgie]

The easiest way to avoid the nostalgia backlash would simply be to call it something else? Extend the title?

Ghosbusters is taken by a 1984 classic. Don't shit on it if it isn't a proper reboot... Is it a reboot? Remake? Sequel? I still don't understand.

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Tapatalk

 

[pantskyle]

Only one review matters in my opinion. I'll sit here patiently awaiting ManWithNoName's review.

 

[bourbons]

The easiest way to avoid the nostalgia backlash would simply be to call it something else? Extend the title?

Ghosbusters is taken by a 1984 classic. Don't shit on it if it isn't a proper reboot... Is it a reboot? Remake? Sequel? I still don't understand.

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Tapatalk

Yep. A bit hard to take it for what it is when the title of the movie is 'Ghostbusters'.

You want to cash in on that name? Gonna have to put up with the comparisons (which I'm sure will be unfavourable).

 

[ManWithNoName]

The internet's a sad, sad place.

 

[peternorth]

The internet's a sad, sad place.

wow! some people just really really want their bias get in the way.not sure if overly negative reviews/posts will sway people wanting to see it. if people wanna see it, they'll go. unless a picket line is formed of course.

look, it could be a shit movie, but IF it bombs all fingers will be pointed to people like that. those people arent actually helping to create a sensible debate. if anything it will drive those who want the movie to succeed to lover levels unseen before.

totally counterproductive, and, well sad.

 

[edgie]

I don't want to see it in any capacity but IF word of mouth is good enough and I know people who see it/download it who say good things, I will go. No senseless boycotting that's for sure.

Sent from my Lumia 800 using Tapatalk

 

[Bostonian]

The NYT one is laughable.

Maybe they brought Zoe Quinn in to do her thing to get a good review.

 

[SnakeMan86]

The internet's a sad, sad place.

Could easily be a few from this thread involved...

 

[DapperDon]

Pretty funny/sad if true

http://furiousfanboys.com/2016/07/s...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

 

[ManWithNoName]

Pretty funny/sad if true

http://furiousfanboys.com/2016/07/s...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

You'll forgive me for not entrusting "furiousfanboys dot com" as a strongly reputable news source.

Unless that's meant to be satire. In which case carry on.