Modern Day Event Global Warming - Real or Not

Are you worried

  • Extremely

    Votes: 35 25.2%

  • Somewhat

    Votes: 41 29.5%

  • Nope

    Votes: 22 15.8%

  • Just a load of BS

    Votes: 35 25.2%

  • Dont have an opinion

    Votes: 6 4.3%
  • Total voters
    139

Remove this Banner Ad



""Bill Koutalianos mentioned to environmental activist David Suzuki that many man-made global warming advocates refuse to acknowledge the fact that UAH, RSS, HadCRUT, and GISS data show relatively flat global temperatures since 1998.

Suzuki looked confused and asked what these references are.

Bill had to explain to Suzuki that these temperature data sets are consulted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for their reports.

Suzuki was still clueless.

When it was explained that UAH is the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Suzuki could only offer a slur on climate skeptics in Huntsville.

Suzuki implied that climate scientists in Alabama are redneck idiots, and by inference extended this opinion to the temperature monitors at NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the private company Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), and the Hadley Centre at the UK Met Office along with the Climate Research Centre at the University of East Anglia (HadCRUT). All say global temperature rise has stalled for more than a decade.

The simpler conclusion is that Suzuki is the idiot."""
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dugdale2Dwyer said:
Warmists have taken a hit this week, seems they've gone to ground too, record cold weather across Australia atm, and not a peep from Dr Karl, Adam Spencer et al.
Click to expand...
Let me take a wild guess :rolleyes: - you know * all about global warming and climate change :cool:
 
Trump fiddles while Rome burns as the rest of the world moves on.

Machine Removes CO2 From The Air And Turns It Into Fertilizer

A Swiss company says it has created the first machine that can commercially suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and reuse it for other purposes.

The Direct Air Capture (DAC) plant, built by Climeworks in Hinwil near Zurich, Switzerland can remove 900 metric tonnes (990 US tons) of CO2 from the atmosphere every year. This can then be used as fertilizer in a nearby greenhouse 400 meters away to help grow vegetables.

It’s a tiny fraction of the 10 gigatonnes of CO2 Climeworks says will need to be removed every year by 2050 to limit global warming. But the company says it’s an important step towards keeping global temperature increases below 2°C (3.6°F), as directed in the Paris Climate Agreement.

“Highly scalable negative emission technologies are crucial if we are to stay below the 2-degree target of the international community,” Christoph Gebald, co-founder and managing director of Climeworks, said in a statement.

The company said it was working towards a goal of filtering 1 percent of global CO2emissions by 2025. To do this, they suggest 250,000 plants like theirs will be needed.



http://www.iflscience.com/environme...o2-from-the-air-and-turns-it-into-fertilizer/
 
Present Not Past you should bring posts like this over from SRP to here

“Climate change has to be sold to the public correctly.
For example, fighting climate change will make Australians wealthy.
Australian scientists are the leaders in fighting climate change.
The patents that are developed in Australia will lead to billions of dollars flowing into the economy.
Let's get behind our greatest minds in Australia with the money they need to do their job.

Billions have flowed into cancer research because everyone is affected in some way by cancer.
Well everyone is going to be affected by climate change.”

The only ones getting rich off your line of thinking are those companies leeching off the taxpayer producing subsidised renewable energy.
Renewables should be sent back to the R&D stage until they come back with something that is more efficient and is a real solution to our mythical problem. Atm, they aren’t renewables. You can’t call something a renewable when the lifespan of the solar panels, wind turbines, etc is very limited and it then takes a shitload more mining to replace it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lebbo73 said:
Present Not Past you should bring posts like this over from SRP to here

“Climate change has to be sold to the public correctly.
For example, fighting climate change will make Australians wealthy.
Australian scientists are the leaders in fighting climate change.
The patents that are developed in Australia will lead to billions of dollars flowing into the economy.
Let's get behind our greatest minds in Australia with the money they need to do their job.

Billions have flowed into cancer research because everyone is affected in some way by cancer.
Well everyone is going to be affected by climate change.”

The only ones getting rich off your line of thinking are those companies leeching off the taxpayer producing subsidised renewable energy.
Renewables should be sent back to the R&D stage until they come back with something that is more efficient and is a real solution to our mythical problem. Atm, they aren’t renewables. You can’t call something a renewable when the lifespan of the solar panels, wind turbines, etc is very limited and it then takes a shitload more mining to replace it.
Click to expand...
Global warming is not a conspiracy and so by right doesn't belong here.
 
Lebbo73 said:
Present Not Past you should bring posts like this over from SRP to here

“Climate change has to be sold to the public correctly.
For example, fighting climate change will make Australians wealthy.
Australian scientists are the leaders in fighting climate change.
The patents that are developed in Australia will lead to billions of dollars flowing into the economy.
Let's get behind our greatest minds in Australia with the money they need to do their job.

Billions have flowed into cancer research because everyone is affected in some way by cancer.
Well everyone is going to be affected by climate change.”

The only ones getting rich off your line of thinking are those companies leeching off the taxpayer producing subsidised renewable energy.
Renewables should be sent back to the R&D stage until they come back with something that is more efficient and is a real solution to our mythical problem. Atm, they aren’t renewables. You can’t call something a renewable when the lifespan of the solar panels, wind turbines, etc is very limited and it then takes a shitload more mining to replace it.
Click to expand...

Do not disagree. Chinese do not care about patents. They steal whatever they need and that is how they have built their country.

The problem with the climate change debate is that we are not being told the whole story. If the whole world went renewable tomorrow it would still take a millenia for the high levels of Co2 to dissipate from the atmosphere.
In the meantime all of the terrible scenarios predicted would still occur. What we need to do now is start changing the way we farm. Crops reliant on being planted need to be grown indoors in controlled environments, farming above ground, drought proofing the country and creating massive reservoirs or lakes.

There is strong evidence that a standing body of water, like a lake, can alter precipitation patterns. Increasing the amount of liquid water in a region increases the amount of evaporation in a region, too. That water vapor will eventually condense and fall as precipitation. So, it's logical to think that a dam's reservoir could have the same impact. And dams allow irrigation, which can transform the land in the area, possibly leading to local climactic impacts.

The Greens would have us believe that if we reduce our carbon footprint everything will be ok. It won't. We have to help ourselves. One thing that the planet has to tackle is overpopulation. How to tackle this issue is another huge problem. The planet cannot cope with 8 billion people. The Chinese had the one child policy which was brutally enforced.

Finally when the super volcano at Yellowstone erupts, global warming will quickly become a distant memory. Nuclear winter will become the next problem, and if we have indoor and or above ground farming we could save ourselves.
 
Lebbo73 said:
Nice graph. Temps are even since 1998. 0.8 degrees Celsius rise in 150 years. All this while temperature recording stations were shifted to warmer areas and urbanisation.
Click to expand...


Haha!

They've moved the weather recording stations and that why they're recording hotter temperatures? Gotcha!

And its not .8 of a degree shift, its 1.6 degrees. But it doesn't seem to be that you even understand what what you're looking at here given you (a) think temps are even since 1998, there has only been .8 of a degree shift in the graph, and the recording is skewed because they've moved the weather stations to hotter places.

Awesome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exe Gesis
Conspiracy Theory Satellites Do Not Exist
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
iBeng
iBeng
Fwoy
Conspiracy Theory Oil is not “fossil fuel”
Replies
1
Views
593
Werewolf
Werewolf
R
Welcome to East Germany ULTIMATE PROOF: COVID 19 WAS PLANNED TO BRING IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER.
10 11 12 13 14
Replies
337
Views
16K
mehow2g
M
Back
Top