Goodes?

[SOPH_CROSS]

Did he get reported for that high knock on that Dees player?

 

[grimlock]

He didn't get reported but the MRP will have a look I'm sure

 

[SOPH_CROSS]

so you can still get banned from games even if ur not reported
seriously AFL rules are so gay sometimes

So he may get banned this time round because he was so lucky as 2 get off last time

 

[is2SWaNz]

Oh dear...

 

[legend166]

If he goes for that I'll be absolutely spewing.

 

[Jeffers]

Not much in it but wouldn't suprise me if it gets looked at. Great another nail biting day tomorrow.

 

[BIGBEZ]

Not much in it, less than usual!
Geez, I bet Goodes legal team would be loving this!
Surprised no threads on the main board yet?

 

[is2SWaNz]

Not much in it but wouldn't suprise me if it gets looked at. Great another nail biting day tomorrow.

And another slab of "protected species" and "love child" talks on BigFooty.

 

[ssfc0203]

There wasn't too much in it, notice him turning back as soon as he'd made contact to look at what he'd just done? I'm not too sure though, because I didn't watch any replays except the first that they showed.

 

[BIGBEZ]

There wasn't too much in it, notice him turning back as soon as he'd made contact to look at what he'd just done? I'm not too sure though, because I didn't watch any replays except the first that they showed.

most of the commentators seemed to brush it away, but one of them suggested at a report, anyone know his name?

 

[Banyo Bloods]

most of the commentators seemed to brush it away, but one of them suggested at a report, anyone know his name?

I think Lynch was hinting at it then back peddled a bit when pressed by Liam Pickering

 

[Bartram_Class]

Nothing in it fellas.

Thought Dunn did a good job on Goodes though.

 

[BIGBEZ]

Nothing in it fellas.

Thought Dunn did a good job on Goodes though.

He was very good, as was Bate, some good signs for the Dees

 

[BIGBEZ]

I think Lynch was hinting at it then back peddled a bit when pressed by Liam Pickering

might not even have got a replay

 

[potatomasher]

That's even softer than the ones he was reported on, but as we know, Goodes tends to have to go to the tribunal whenever he gives away a free kick.

 

[SOPH_CROSS]

Sorry i just didnt know what the go was coz i saw people saying he was gone but i didnt see a report

 

[pup23]

hope goodes gets a week he deserves it always seems to get off at the tribunal as hes there love child and has 93 carry points from last time so wouldnt be surpised if he did get a week

 

[phonepopeye]

Of course he'll get cited. It's a flawed rule. Same verdict as last time. Watch him wreak havoc versus the toothless ferals in two weeks.

 

[Costanza_]

Of course he'll get cited. It's a flawed rule. Same verdict as last time. Watch him wreak havoc versus the toothless ferals in two weeks.

If it's the same verdict as last time then he will miss 1 match given his carryover points.

Why am I worried about the MRP tonight when no-one else seems to be?

 

[Sanecow]

Why am I worried about the MRP tonight when no-one else seems to be?

Because they are hilariously inconsistent!

 

[grimlock]

Because they are hilariously inconsistent!

Isn't that more reason to be worried because this bump was more innocuous than the Selwood one>?

 

[Sanecow]

Isn't that more reason to be worried because this bump was more innocuous than the Selwood one>?

That's what I meant; that's why Costanza is worried! I am a bit nervous but at least it didn't get replayed ad nauseum like any other Goodes / Hall incident so the public isn't frothing at the mouth.

 

[grimlock]

Oh right, just re-read your comment. Not sure what I was thinking.

 

[phantom13]

Goodes has been very, VERY lucky a few times at the tribunal, when i first saw the incident i thought he was in a bit of strife, however with Selwood i thought he was gone for 2-3 for sure. No one could possibly know what the MRP will come up with, i dont wanna see a good player out, but, with his carry over points and the fact he should have got a spell for the Selwood incident he must go this time.
Question for the Swans supporters. He is a star footballer very talented one of the best of this generation, why does he continue to do stupid things like this or the Selwood incident or going back the Godfrey incident? Is he an angry angry man, does he just have silly brain fades or is he a bit mentally weak, not stirring up trouble just curious as to why he does it??

 

[Costanza_]

Question for the Swans supporters. He is a star footballer very talented one of the best of this generation, why does he continue to do stupid things like this or the Selwood incident or going back the Godfrey incident? Is he an angry angry man, does he just have silly brain fades or is he a bit mentally weak, not stirring up trouble just curious as to why he does it??

F___ked if I know. I was ropable with him after the hit yesterday, although I still haven't seen a replay. BF tends to exxagerate the malice/impact of the incidents he is involved in, but the truth remains that he should not be putting himself in these situations.

Maybe I'm exxagerating this incident in my own mind - as I said I haven't caught a replay. But if he gets pulled up by the MRP yet again, something really needs to be done internally at the Swans to pull his head into line.

We desperately need him against the Pies. Fingers crossed...