Stephen Alomes has written a very interesting article in The Age today about the effect of negative game-styles on the spectacle of Aussie Rules footy.
Some quotes from the article:
From the comments on the article, it seems the reaction is split into two camps:
- people agreeing with him
- people accusing him of anti-Freo or anti-Interstate bias.
I would be interested in BigFooty's thoughts on it.
PS: It's easy but not very helpful to descend into a slanging match between clubs, i.e. Geelong and Freo, but that is being done to death elsewhere. Let's try to keep this about the game itself.
As my grand-dad used to say "Less heat, more light"
Some quotes from the article:
Gyms, rugby league-style tackling and aerobic capacity have created the new siege game perfected in all its ugliness by Fremantle. I call it Tackleball and Stoppageball, Robert Walls uses "rolling scrum", Drew Morphett "mobile wrestling", Ted Hopkins refers to Ugby (fusing rugby and ugly). In this Umpireball, the game of stoppages and throw-ins, the umpires get more touches than most players.
The Lyon game is the extreme version of the forward press: ugliness personified and "Smotherball" are the latest deformities imposed on the game. Footy is about the contested ball. It is also about kicking and marking, handballing and goaling. At its best it is hard but honourable, as in tough finals.
From the comments on the article, it seems the reaction is split into two camps:
- people agreeing with him
- people accusing him of anti-Freo or anti-Interstate bias.
I would be interested in BigFooty's thoughts on it.
PS: It's easy but not very helpful to descend into a slanging match between clubs, i.e. Geelong and Freo, but that is being done to death elsewhere. Let's try to keep this about the game itself.
As my grand-dad used to say "Less heat, more light"






