Remove this Banner Ad

How is it the RFC always get dragged into the mud.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You did more solid journalism in 10 minutes than sky has ever done in 20 years
The crazy thing is it’s not even Sky news it’s the lawyer, why the club even needed to be mentioned I’ll never know. Whether it was an AFL player or local player shouldn’t have any bearing on the case.
 
The crazy thing is it’s not even Sky news it’s the lawyer, why the club even needed to be mentioned I’ll never know. Whether it was an AFL player or local player shouldn’t have any bearing on the case.
Sky news ran with it. Lots of mistakes are made in court but taking that and running with it as truth? Media isn't protected in some cases. They can't just say 2 and 2 equals richmond drugs. The lawyer only enquired. The news reported it as fact without pointing out the factual correctness
 
Sky news ran with it. Lots of mistakes are made in court but taking that and running with it as truth? Media isn't protected in some cases. They can't just say 2 and 2 equals richmond drugs. The lawyer only enquired. The news reported it as fact without pointing out the factual correctness
Yeah fair point, media has zero accountability in any area these days.
 
Sky news ran with it. Lots of mistakes are made in court but taking that and running with it as truth? Media isn't protected in some cases. They can't just say 2 and 2 equals richmond drugs. The lawyer only enquired. The news reported it as fact without pointing out the factual correctness

Sky probably paid the lawyer to bring up Richmond so they could report it.
 
“Was it Richmond?” Mr Edwardson asked.

“I don’t recall,” Mr Robinson said.

But they still went with the headline lol
Judges name is Alan blow 😮‍💨 my God you can't make this shit up lol
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

How is it the RFC always get dragged into the mud.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top