- Oct 3, 2006
- 1,640
- 3,437
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Phillip Island Bulldogs/Lions AFLW
Of course they are, for the same reason Fiji is strong in rugby.
They have 500,000 people in a compact area with a good league.
I struggle to comprehend you even mention S.I. and Vanuatu.
So haven't you answered your own question ?
How can the addition of a world body not help the AFL if the AFL is doing "zip".
(World Body) Because as you suggested it would be an "AFL" world body, mate. Why add another institution when as others have pointed out above, the same goals could be achieved from an office at AFL house and a few people pick up the phone?
(Fiji) The Fijiian league is quite young and a place like Denmark has a far bigger population in a small area with a more established league. Denmark (with the minor exception of Aksel Bang) hasn't been elevated above NZ or USA as a likely source of organic footballers.
I mentioned other Melanesian countries because there are many ethno-cultural similarities between them. I don't know how Fiji being amazing at Rugby 7s means that they'll produce more organic Australian footballers, when the power of Rugby in NZ is often singled out as a reason other football codes struggle.
I have seen lots of posters here put their ideas out into the forum, some with merit, some quite flawed, but you've seemed to had a bone to pick with almost all of them. The international aspect of Australian Football is beyond a challenge. Embryonic doesn't come close to describing it when you look at other similar sports (lacrosse even!). As The_Wookie pointed out, you seem to have ideas that most would characterise as "pie in the sky". He asked you about the 50 countries and you couldn't give him an answer, even though it seems like a pretty simple question. It's hard to see why others are so obviously wrong whenever they pop their heads up, but you seem to have answers on tap.
I'm the first to admit I'm not the suppository of all wisdom when it comes to footy beyond our borders; I'm very much a greenhorn when it comes to actually being involved on the ground. However, I'm sure that there is a lot of experience and knowledge contained within the four walls of this sub-forum that you seem to flippantly dismiss on the reg.
I didn't mean for this to become a rant. I bear no ill will nor do I think you're not 100% invested in footy's success overseas, but it's frustrating to read so many plainly negative posts.