Remove this Banner Ad

Roast If You Don't Stand For Something...

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I recently saw a young aboriginal girl wearing second hand clothes wondering by a gas station, waiting for the chance to get a drop of leftover petrol with a plastic Coke bottle.

The fact I saw this, and that it's still a problem today, makes me wonder why LGBT issues receive far more coverage then the disadvantage our indigenous population face on a much larger scale.
Good point.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Agreed, but I think this is where people look at this argument wrong.

I don't view it through the prism of people voting yes v people voting no. I view it through the LGBT community v people voting no.

They are two very different groups, with two very different wishes, and the effect the result will have is exponentially more severe either way to one group than the other.
Yes, that would be the proper construction of the 'sides', but in reality it is not. Unfortunately, the LGBT community has been represented by non-LGBT people in a manner that is quite reprehensible. The no side also have done the same thing which is the basis for my comment. A couple of friends of mine who desperately want this to happen are frightened of the vitriol created by people who mean well but have executed that intention poorly and the fallout being people voting no as a result.
 
I voted yes. it makes sense.


Or maybe i didnt, and i'm just scared of being bullied by the yes campaigners... or head butted.
who knows.

i think if the government decided its worth having a plebiscide, then it is up to the public to decide what is best based on their moral code.

but i did really vote based on my own opinion - assuming this is a democracy after all.
 
You're squandering the moral high ground
You didn't answer the question. Nobody has answered that question yet.

Take two.
Do you think the abuse LGBT people suffer and the abuse no campaigners suffer is equal and/or has an equal effect on them emotionally and mentally?
 
Yes, that would be the proper construction of the 'sides', but in reality it is not. Unfortunately, the LGBT community has been represented by non-LGBT people in a manner that is quite reprehensible. The no side also have done the same thing which is the basis for my comment. A couple of friends of mine who desperately want this to happen are frightened of the vitriol created by people who mean well but have executed that intention poorly and the fallout being people voting no as a result.
But considering the greater effect this has on the lives of LGBT people, do you not think it's fair they would be more passionate about it?

And I'm not talking headbutting or abusing people here.
 
You didn't answer the question. Nobody has answered that question yet.

Take two.
Do you think the abuse LGBT people suffer and the abuse no campaigners suffer is equal and/or has an equal effect on them emotionally and mentally?
Of course it isn't, but calling them no "campaigners" is a very easy way to swing an impressionable voter away from your cause.

You always catch more flies with honey instead of vinegar
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Of course it isn't, but calling them no "campaigners" is a very easy way to swing an impressionable voter away from your cause.
I mean campaigner in it's actual usage of people campaigning for the no vote. I've used the term yes campaigners in this thread too. Neither were swear filtered.
 
But considering the greater effect this has on the lives of LGBT people, do you not think it's fair they would be more passionate about it?

And I'm not talking headbutting or abusing people here.
Passion is one thing, it is quite another to denegrate people who are entitled to their views, however wrong they may seem to the majority of people.

Here is an example, there is a time when I would have voted no. Some time ago I may add, but that little admission (even after saying i voted yes) got me a barrage of neckbeard facebook abuse. As an outsider looking in who had not yet voted, that could be enough to put someone off if they couldn't care less. And couldn't care less isn't code for 'vote yes because it doesn't affect you' because people will vote on emotion, just as the LBGT community and supporters are.
 
Wtf does footy have to do with gay marriage ? Just like gambling , drinking and recreational drugs what players do in the personal lives is their own business .

OP is being a typical outraged lefty and blowing shit out of proportion .

I would much rather keep my football and politics seperate
 
Of course it isn't, but calling them no "campaigners" is a very easy way to swing an impressionable voter away from your cause.

You always catch more flies with honey instead of vinegar
I was listening to nova last night in an uber and **** me, the DJ went on a diatribe about no voters with a lot less class than has been displayed here and basically told everyone who was voting no to change stations because he didnt want people like them listening to his show.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I was listening to nova last night in an uber and **** me, the DJ went on a diatribe about no voters with a lot less class than has been displayed here and basically told everyone who was voting no to change stations because he didnt want people like them listening to his show.
lol Nova :rainbow:
 
How about anyone trying to push a political agenda rather than discussing football ****s off somewhere else.

This is something over half the clubs in the league have done, and something the club actively chose not to do. I think it's a valid discussion. If you disagree, read another thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top