Remove this Banner Ad

Is Hogan Back??

  • Thread starter Thread starter jod23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by eastaugh36


What I meant was that hulk is alot bigger and stronger than kidman and realistically you would not expect hulk to lose to him !
Undertaker did not job to anyone at the rumble, he was eliminated when he wasnt looking, jobbing is when you are beaten fair and square !
Also christian is boring !

So going by that logic.. Jericho is the current undisputed champion but you would expect him to lose to.. The Big Show, Kane, Test, Booker T, DDP, The Big Bossman... the list goes on and on

And what the Undertaker did at the rumble.. Hogan wouldn't do that for a mid card wrestler let alone a guy who has wrestled 4 matches

And Christian is boring is he?? Yeah he has a terrible entrance :rolleyes: a terrible wrestler :rolleyes: he is crap on the mic :rolleyes: he gets no heat from the crowd :rolleyes: ... No Christian has nothing going for him.. I suppose your one of those people that pisses themselves everytime The Crock says Jabroni or Candy Ass
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rey Mysterio Jnr pin Kevin Nash on a WCW telecast? This supports the notion that some big guys do job to smaller guys. Furthermore going by the same logic, why didn't Hulk job to Andre?

I don't hate Hogan, he does cut great interviews but for mine, his time was the 80s, not the 2000s. It seems to be a backward step to bring Hogan in after the WWF worked so hard to establish new stars.

My prediction: the ratings will increase in the short-term and then dramatically drop: the same thing that happened, when Hogan joined WCW.
 
Originally posted by Rusty Brookes
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Rey Mysterio Jnr pin Kevin Nash on a WCW telecast? This supports the notion that some big guys do job to smaller guys. Furthermore going by the same logic, why didn't Hulk job to Andre?

I don't hate Hogan, he does cut great interviews but for mine, his time was the 80s, not the 2000s. It seems to be a backward step to bring Hogan in after the WWF worked so hard to establish new stars.

My prediction: the ratings will increase in the short-term and then dramatically drop: the same thing that happened, when Hogan joined WCW.

This is my point, firstly, Nash will job for for his buddies, get him in the ring with Triple H and he will put Triple H over.. Scott Hall as well .. remember Razor Ramon vs 1-2-3 Kid??

Hogans time was in the 80's, I just hope that all three have signed contracts for about a year and this will just be a farewell to them all, sadly I can't see that happening

Hall will be fired within the first few months, have you seen the NWO videos the WWF are showing?? His eyes are already hanging out of his head, Remember Grandmaster Sexay and Road Dogg were both fired in the last year or so for it

Nash won't be too bad, if he doesn't act like an arseh*le

And Hogan well... I suppose it can't be that bad can it????
 
Originally posted by McCartney5


So going by that logic.. Jericho is the current undisputed champion but you would expect him to lose to.. The Big Show, Kane, Test, Booker T, DDP, The Big Bossman... the list goes on and on

And what the Undertaker did at the rumble.. Hogan wouldn't do that for a mid card wrestler let alone a guy who has wrestled 4 matches

And Christian is boring is he?? Yeah he has a terrible entrance :rolleyes: a terrible wrestler :rolleyes: he is crap on the mic :rolleyes: he gets no heat from the crowd :rolleyes: ... No Christian has nothing going for him.. I suppose your one of those people that pisses themselves everytime The Crock says Jabroni or Candy Ass

um, jericho is a bit bigger and better than kidman and a hell of a lot more over so you cant compare that !

Christian is terribly boring and it is hard to take him seriously. Wrestling is meant to be about bad asses like the NWO, vince etc etc not clowns like him, I dont find that sort of thing very interesting
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by eastaugh36

Wrestling is meant to be about bad asses like the NWO, vince etc etc not clowns like him

um... yeah.. ok then... it's just about bad asses.. like Hogan in the 80's right??? And that Kurt Angle with his milk what a bad mother!!! :rolleyes: and you are calling me an idiot :o
 
Originally posted by McCartney5


um... yeah.. ok then... it's just about bad asses.. like Hogan in the 80's right??? And that Kurt Angle with his milk what a bad mother!!! :rolleyes: and you are calling me an idiot :o

You are an idiot !
Kurt can be bad when needed.
I meant bad asses and the good guys fighting them, that is interesting but clowns like christian are oh so boring !
 
Originally posted by Nod
Austin vs Hogan !!
Could be the biggest match in wrestling history
What !

The biggest wrestling match of all time has already being....Hulk Hogan V Andre the Giant.

McCartney - why should Hogan go down for punks like Kidman??? All that does is tarnish Hogans great record, it will make him look like a pushover cos he got older. I fully understand that he doesnt want to tarnish his record and maybe you dont want to recognise it but there a still millions of Hulkamaniacs out there who want to see Hulk Hogan win.
 
Yeah hogan nash and hall are back this week..im over in LA at the moment and went to smackdown last week..it was pretty cool...
 
Originally posted by jod23


The biggest wrestling match of all time has already being....Hulk Hogan V Andre the Giant.

McCartney - why should Hogan go down for punks like Kidman??? All that does is tarnish Hogans great record, it will make him look like a pushover cos he got older. I fully understand that he doesnt want to tarnish his record and maybe you dont want to recognise it but there a still millions of Hulkamaniacs out there who want to see Hulk Hogan win.

spot on !!!!!!
 
Originally posted by jod23


McCartney - why should Hogan go down for punks like Kidman??? All that does is tarnish Hogans great record, it will make him look like a pushover cos he got older. I fully understand that he doesnt want to tarnish his record and maybe you dont want to recognise it but there a still millions of Hulkamaniacs out there who want to see Hulk Hogan win.

He is over 50, why shouldn't he put over young guys??? Are you a "Hulkamaniac" are you??? You didn't even know he was coming back, basketball guru perhaps, leave the wrestling to others Joddy!!!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by McCartney5


He is over 50, why shouldn't he put over young guys??? Are you a "Hulkamaniac" are you??? You didn't even know he was coming back, basketball guru perhaps, leave the wrestling to others Joddy!!!

I was a big wrestling fan and a Hulkamaniac when i was younger when wrestling was still good. Nowadays i dont like it, wrestling has gone to ****, plus in Perth we get **** all coverage of WWF and i dont have Foxtel so i see very little of what goes on.

Anyway Hulk Hogan is wrestling! The best there is, was and ever will be!
 
Originally posted by jod23


I was a big wrestling fan and a Hulkamaniac when i was younger when wrestling was still good. Nowadays i dont like it, wrestling has gone to ****, plus in Perth we get **** all coverage of WWF and i dont have Foxtel so i see very little of what goes on.

Anyway Hulk Hogan is wrestling! The best there is, was and ever will be!

Bret Hart can lay claim to being "The best there is, was and ever will be"-after all it was his catch-phrase.

Jod, you are simply setting yourself up for a fall, by saying Hulk Hogan is wrestling. Sure he was one of the most important figures of all time but wrestling seems to have travelled along quite nicely without him.

The Greatest Cable Rating: Steve Austin vs Undertaker (around 10 points-translates to around 30 million viewers, I think)
Greatest Pay Per View Buy Rate: Steve Austin vs Rock (last WrestleMania)
Largest Crowd: Antonio Inoki vs Ric Flair (190,000 in North Korea)
 
Originally posted by Rusty Brookes


Bret Hart can lay claim to being "The best there is, was and ever will be"-after all it was his catch-phrase.

Jod, you are simply setting yourself up for a fall, by saying Hulk Hogan is wrestling. Sure he was one of the most important figures of all time but wrestling seems to have travelled along quite nicely without him.

The Greatest Cable Rating: Steve Austin vs Undertaker (around 10 points-translates to around 30 million viewers, I think)
Greatest Pay Per View Buy Rate: Steve Austin vs Rock (last WrestleMania)
Largest Crowd: Antonio Inoki vs Ric Flair (190,000 in North Korea)

Numbers mean ****.....everybody knows who Hulk Hogan is! Stone Cold, The Rock, Undertaker...??? Yes there famous and certainly a lot of people know who they are but non wrestling fans still know who Hulk Hogan is!
 
Originally posted by jod23


Numbers mean ****.....everybody knows who Hulk Hogan is! Stone Cold, The Rock, Undertaker...??? Yes there famous and certainly a lot of people know who they are but non wrestling fans still know who Hulk Hogan is!

The Rock is as if not more famous than Hogan was.
 
Im sure things will be different this time around with Hogan in the WWF. There is no way McMahon wouldve hired him if he wasnt prepared to do the occasional job.

Im actually looking forward to it, if only just to see how they handle it all.
 
Originally posted by jod23


Numbers mean ****.....everybody knows who Hulk Hogan is! Stone Cold, The Rock, Undertaker...??? Yes there famous and certainly a lot of people know who they are but non wrestling fans still know who Hulk Hogan is!

spot on !
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Stone Cold sold more merchandise tha Hogan ever did, Jod.

Hogan was big because Vince made him big. He was big in an era where the title very rarely changed hands. I always barracked for the Macho man ahead of Hogan back in the 80's. I was never a "fanboy." It's easy to be "big" when the storyline makes you a superhero that never loses. :rolleyes:

Hogan is an important figure in wrestling history. Indeed he was the biggest figure at the time. But The Rock and Stone Cold are bigger. Just ask the youngies of today, who they prefer out of the Rock or Hulk Hogan. They won't say Hogan, I assure you. Wrestling reaches more people all over the world in 2002 than it did in 1985. Hogan was a factor in 1985. He is not a factor in 2002

Hogan is an egomaniac and should retire. What does he expect to gain out of coming back? It will tarnish his fabulous reputation.
 
Originally posted by Dan26
Stone Cold sold more merchandise tha Hogan ever did, Jod.

Hogan was big because Vince made him big. He was big in an era where the title very rarely changed hands. I always barracked for the Macho man ahead of Hogan back in the 80's. I was never a "fanboy." It's easy to be "big" when the storyline makes you a superhero that never loses. :rolleyes:

Hogan is an important figure in wrestling history. Indeed he was the biggest figure at the time. But The Rock and Stone Cold are bigger. Just ask the youngies of today, who they prefer out of the Rock or Hulk Hogan. They won't say Hogan, I assure you. Wrestling reaches more people all over the world in 2002 than it did in 1985. Hogan was a factor in 1985. He is not a factor in 2002

Hogan is an egomaniac and should retire. What does he expect to gain out of coming back? It will tarnish his fabulous reputation.

Wrestling wouldnt be what it is today without Hulk Hogan. The man almost single handedly turned wrestling into one of the most exciting sports in the world. And then you just sit back and disrespect him like that....shame on you. What about asking oldies who the Rock is or Stone Cold....Hulk Hogan is bigger tahn wrestling, he always was and always will be.

Hulk Hogan is the greatest!
 
Originally posted by Dan26
Stone Cold sold more merchandise tha Hogan ever did, Jod.

Hogan was big because Vince made him big. He was big in an era where the title very rarely changed hands. I always barracked for the Macho man ahead of Hogan back in the 80's. I was never a "fanboy." It's easy to be "big" when the storyline makes you a superhero that never loses. :rolleyes:

Hogan is an important figure in wrestling history. Indeed he was the biggest figure at the time. But The Rock and Stone Cold are bigger. Just ask the youngies of today, who they prefer out of the Rock or Hulk Hogan. They won't say Hogan, I assure you. Wrestling reaches more people all over the world in 2002 than it did in 1985. Hogan was a factor in 1985. He is not a factor in 2002

Hogan is an egomaniac and should retire. What does he expect to gain out of coming back? It will tarnish his fabulous reputation.


rock and stone cold are big only because vince made them too !

Hulk rules !!!!!!
 
Hulk may have done a lot, but now he's a dirty old man, who doesn't belong in any wrestling ring, let alone in the WWF.

Havinf the WWF ****ting themselves about the poison is embarrasing. 3 pensioners are coming in and supposedly they're the poison thats gonna kill the WWF. They should come in, fight Taka, Crash and Torrie Wilson, get there arses kicked and piss off
 
Originally posted by The_Flying_Egg
Hulk may have done a lot, but now he's a dirty old man, who doesn't belong in any wrestling ring, let alone in the WWF.

Havinf the WWF ****ting themselves about the poison is embarrasing. 3 pensioners are coming in and supposedly they're the poison thats gonna kill the WWF. They should come in, fight Taka, Crash and Torrie Wilson, get there arses kicked and piss off


um, the pension age is for 60 year olds and above, I dont think these 3 are quite that age !

hulk rules
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom