Remove this Banner Ad

It's time Usman

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Batting positionInnsNORunsHSAveBallsSR100s50s
1335154023255.00313449.1346
2474187218043.53420044.5749
3663234317437.19457351.23612
4401248231.0018467.3901
531267137133.5045059.3320
641602620.0016037.5000
Opening809341223248.06733446.52815
3 to 6775279417438.81536752.068
13​

Thrived at the top of the order, his record as an opener is significantly better than it is down the order. Perhaps the move coincided with his best form, but you'd have to say on evidence he was a genuine opener.

Below is the Top 10 Australian openers by average (opening stats only, min 30 innings). Simpson and Ponsford were obviously freaks, after that it is pretty close and Usman stacks up pretty well.

RankPlayerInnNORuns100sAve
1R B Simpson7043664855.52
2W H Ponsford3131517554.18
3W M Woodfull4442036750.90
4M L Hayden1841486253050.74
5S M Katich6132928850.48
6J L Langer115951121648.23
7U T Khawaja8093412848.06
8W M Lawry1231252341347.15
9A R Morris76233811145.69
10D A Warner202887472645.09
 
He's had a very good career, no question. In my own personal Top 50 of Test players post-WSC (I can't actually find the thread right now), I'd place him just below Mitchell Johnson and Jason Gillespie - someone with a long, distinguished but not ATG career. So basically around 25th - not on par with the 100 Test club (or Hussey, for that matter), but among the best of the rest.

Did he fare as well as people expected when he first made his debut? Maybe, maybe not - big things were always expected of him. But you'd always take an 88 Test career averaging 43+ at the outset.

He's very unusual, in that he only really fulfilled his potential at the highest level after turning 35. I think this was caused by a variety of things:
  • Opening consistently, so he'd face the newer ball instead of an older one (thus facing spin less)
  • Working hard on his play against spin bowling beyond that - during most of his career, he was frankly quite hopeless against it, but he helped us secure multiple wins against SL, IND and PAK on the subcontinent, which is no mean feat
  • Probably feeling more secure under McDonald than he ever did under Langer (whom he clashed with) and Lehmann (who doesn't really impress me as Usman's type, and vice versa) made him more comfortable playing his natural game, whatever that was

Will say that at Usman's best, his late cuts were delightful, and his pull shots were always pretty graceful.

Whatever you think of his recent behaviour, he is a role model for aspiring Muslim and minority cricketers, and he deserves a decent sendoff with our thanks.
 
I remember when he was in his early days, I wanted him to get selected, to me he was like Symonds, you wanted them to get that break-through score. Usman had a very solid career, he was what we needed, but I feel in my guts that he hung on too long. It's kind of irony in a way, they took forever to select him in his youth, and then took forever to move him on.
Interesting you mentioned Symonds

I dont recall skin colour ever being a topic of debate or racial undertones being used or mention about or by Roy for or against him as a cricketer or any issues he had.

Symonds was one of most loved cricketers in his generation.

When he called out the Indians for racist remarks the Australian public backed him in.

Its a shame his employer CA were too gutless to follow through not wanting to upset the BCCI.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I dont recall skin colour ever being a topic of debate or racial undertones being used or mention about or by Roy for or against him as a cricketer or any issues he had.
I mean this in the nicest way, but I think being a proper yobbo who got suspended by the team once for drinking too much piss made him "a proper Aussie" in the eyes of the unwashed masses.

Compare a guy who doesn't drink: I mean that's an insult to Boonie, Doug Walters and all the rest. Un Australian.
 
Last edited:
Interesting you mentioned Symonds

I dont recall skin colour ever being a topic of debate or racial undertones being used or mention about or by Roy for or against him as a cricketer or any issues he had.

Symonds was one of most loved cricketers in his generation.

When he called out the Indians for racist remarks the Australian public backed him in.

Its a shame his employer CA were too gutless to follow through not wanting to upset the BCCI.

Not all of them did, that was the problem.

Most on BigFooty did, but not everyone.
 
It should have been a celebration of his career and what he has achieved. Which is pretty bloody good. The whole speech was, to a point.

It was derailed somewhat. I think he only has himself to blame for that.
 
That is the worst speech I've ever seen from a retiring sportsmen.. race card.. really..
Don't mind him sharing his perspective. Some things he's blaming on racism like being percieved as a lazy fielder are incorrect but some of his remarks are accurate.
 
Don't mind him sharing his perspective. Some things he's blaming on racism like being percieved as a lazy fielder are incorrect but some of his remarks
He is living in paradise compared to where he came from where you get jailed for speaking your mind. You come to a free country dont sook that the dominant culture doesnt lay out the red carpet for you. We accept people here when they dont even assimilate what more does he want.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It's time Usman

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top